April 19
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 19, 2017.
Rhys Heffley
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any connexion between these two subjects. Adam9007 (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "Rhys Heffley" Borderlands brings up only this redirect and the WikiProject Video Games article alert about this redirects nomination. Thryduulf (talk) 12:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Rhys is a character, but the surname isn't revealed. Probably some fan theory redirect that should be deleted. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 13:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Norman Heffley
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any connexion between these two subjects. Adam9007 (talk) 21:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. I too can find not connection between the name and the target. Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There seems to be a Norman Hall who did voice work on the game, but the surname is different. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 13:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Gyoergy Kulin
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 19:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) Because Gyoergy is well... but the article says it needs translation in Hungarian. Leave Tavix to tidy up RfD, I'll get on with that Si Trew (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Glenn Stroemberg
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) seems never to have been called Glenn Stroemberg Si Trew (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
1 E 4 m2
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 May 2#1 E 4 m2
The Fuhrer
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy keep per WP:SK#1, nominator has failed to advance an argument for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 21:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) this is the only reason I am bringing this up at RfD. Seems like a speedy keep to me. Si Trew (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I agree with nom, this is a keep. Why bring it up at RfD? Sam Sailor 22:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Obviously a keep. The only plausible alternative target, Hitler, is prominently mentioned in the lede, so it's not an issue. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Agueero
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 May 2#Agueero
Ville Itaelae
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. Evidence of usage has been found. -- Tavix (talk) 19:21, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot). Finnish not Germanic language. Si Trew (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Nue metal
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. I'll update the RCAT to ((R from misspelling)). -- Tavix (talk) 19:14, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This has probably got (by eubot) from Metal Umlaut, but it may be blocking. The article does not have any metal umlaut. We haven't Si Trew (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The redirect gets view, the spelling gets relevant hits on Google and Nu metal#Terminology and origins states "Nu metal is also known as nü-metal..." with two citations. All this means this is a plausible redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 12:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Thryduulf. Don't think there's anything else called Nue metal in English that this could refer to. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 13:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Zuerich (disambiguation)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. Withdrawn unopposed. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An unnedded whatever, give our readers the runaround. I think this one by consensus would be speedily deleted. Eubot Si Trew (talk) 20:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are several Germanic things named "Zürich" at the disambiguation. No runarounds here. -- Tavix (talk) 20:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, @Tavix:, but it is kinda blocking in the sense that it we are redirecting to a dab. No problem with that, but there is already all the other DABs to it. I suppose it is harmless, but why am I thinking then it should be deleted? Eubot of course. Si Trew (talk) 20:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any problem with this redirect whatsoever. -- Tavix (talk) 20:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Neither do I, frankly. Speedily withdrawn by nom. They get you like that when you've done a few. Si Trew (talk) 21:02, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Okazakikoen- mae Station
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. I'll note that Siuenti did register a comment here. They recommended deletion of Okazakikōen- mae Station as well, which I will accept as the consensus is that the extra space is what is implausible here. -- Tavix (talk) 19:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not Germanic but Japanese. We have no consensus on these yet. User:Siuenti is the expert for these ones. Si Trew (talk) 20:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- It was not withdrawn unopposed. The expert on these ones is Siuenti. It was not withdrawn. Check the history. Did you say me seeing keep or withdrawn unopposed. Redirects stick around for roughly says seven days, have you read the instructions? What I said was "we have no consensus on these ones yet". Si Trew (talk) 20:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems to me that Patar knight meant to close the discussion below it. I'll reopen as it obviously hasn't been withdrawn. -- Tavix (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, sometimes the section header/edit links just straight up take me to the wrong section. It must affect the script as well. Don't know if it's server-side or client side. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 13:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - ((R from diacritics)), but the extra space on one side of the hyphen makes this implausible. Stats show not in use. Siuenti is blocked and won't be able to weigh in at the moment. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Ivanvector. Unless the extra space is common, this is too much. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 13:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because of the extra space which is an unlikely typo. — JFG talk 17:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
S bond
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. Withdrawn unopposed. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Now, no no no no no. A sigma bond is never ever called an S bond. It may be called a sigma bond or the greek sign for capital S which I cannot do here. Probably a keep, but just this is eubot backforming, as and as someone said earlier, scientists are very particular about these things. Nobody would call it an S bond, but it is a reasonable search term. Si Trew (talk) 20:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I suppose what I am saying is that eubot can send you round the houses if you are not careful. This is an obvious Keep and Withdrawn I would expect. However there are plenty of adhesives and other things called this so it may be a little bit confusing. Si Trew (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- BEcause I am a man who thinks erudite is a type of glue. Si Trew (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
7.5 cm leichte Infanteriegeschuetz 18
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
it is not quite that size. Si Trew (talk) 20:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Well actually that is pretty much standard size. Actually this one is a straight Keep' as withdrawn by nom. No accents in it. Fine, long but fine. KLeep. Si Trew (talk) 20:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Sueleyman Nazif
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 May 1#Sueleyman Nazif
Dopplegaenger
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 11:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) A doppelganger in English is a doppelganger, not a dopplegaenger. WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Si Trew (talk) 20:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- he think that gets me is there is a perfectly good word English word, doppelganger. I mean, come on. Si Trew (talk) 20:14, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. It's a German loanword and the spelling is even used in the article. You have a nonsense definition of nonsense. -- Tavix (talk) 20:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I know that but it in English, this is the English Wikipedia, would be spelled "Doppelganger" not "Doppelgaenger". Si Trew (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, yes. I hadn't noticed that part of the word was misspelled, I was focused on the "gaenger" part. I'll strike the "strong" part of my !vote. Thank you for the correction. -- Tavix (talk) 21:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Millionar
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to Millionär. Deryck C. 13:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
hmmm, I think this might be a retarget for Millionaire or something, who can tell... well consensus can tell. Perhaps it is not the best target at the moment. (eubot) Si Trew (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a transliteration of one of the target band's most prominent singles, "Millionär", according to the article. Google does show uses with this spelling, although as it's a common word in Norweigian (wikt:Millionar tells me it is the plural indefinite of "million" in Nynorsk) you have to do some filtering of the results. Thryduulf (talk) 13:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Thryduulf. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 13:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget to the dab page at Millionär. – Uanfala (talk) 11:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Buekkzserc
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 19:07, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hungarian not German. Kill it. Si Trew (talk) 20:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm seeing a lot of hits for this, but the "Bükkzserc" spelling is what appears in the preview. Further investigation shows that the "ue" version is in the URI though, so it appears that at least one (and probably more) algorithm is converting Turkish ü to ue for URIs. Does that make a good reason for a redirect though? I'm unsure, hence this is presented as a comment rather than a recommendation. Thryduulf (talk) 13:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The transliteration does get some use (e.g. [5]), even if incorrectly. Tag it ((R from error)). ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 14:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bluemlisalphorn
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 19:06, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot). Errr... cut it unless anyone can find this in RS. Si Trew (talk) 20:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A simple google search finds no shortage of human uses of this spelling, and plenty more that may or may not be (particularly stock photo sites). Thryduulf (talk) 13:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Thryduulf. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 14:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ernoe von Dohnanyi
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 May 2#Ernoe von Dohnanyi
Houses of the Mole
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 19:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) I know it is a kinda R from diacritics but makes it a bit of nonsense. A mole lives in a Molehill. It is just a bit nonsense. Si Trew (talk) 19:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hoern
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to List of names of Freyja. -- Tavix (talk) 18:52, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) well that's a new one on me that a scandinavian god called Hoern. I can see where it comes from, but this is WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Not called Hoern. Si Trew (talk) 19:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Almost all I can find on Google for this are references to Germany hotels and a few German ships (mainly a dredger based in Kiel harbour) and the occasional surname. Nothing related to the target at all. Thryduulf (talk) 13:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget to List of names of Freyja. Valid transliteration of Hörn, one of her attested names. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 14:04, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget per Patar knight — JFG talk 17:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Yueeh-chih
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
eubot redirected it from "üeh-chih". I don't think any reliable sources have this spelling. Si Trew (talk) 19:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It seems to be an archaic form of the name, as Project Gutenburg is the prime source of hits, but that's more of a reason for a redirect as modern readers will be unfamiliar with the term. Thryduulf (talk) 13:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Thryduulf. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 14:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Koroesy
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not Germanic but Huungarian. Korrossy must be an unusual surname because I have not heard of it; but Koroesy certainly is not. You just can't do that with names. Si Trew (talk) 19:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The single relevant human use I found was an author's note in a Project Gutenburg book noting that they had corrected "Koroesy" to "Koeroesy". Thryduulf (talk) 13:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Keleti palyaudvar (Budapest Metro)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just kill it. It makes no sense without the diacritical marks. We have plenty of others to this place, and I go there every day. Just kill it. Please. Si Trew (talk) 19:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:DIACRITICS. Every title that includes diacritics should be reachable by a redirect from the same title without diacritics unless the version without diacritics is ambiguous or primary topic for some other article (in which case the title with diacritics should be reachable via a disambiguation page and/or hatnote). Thryduulf (talk) 13:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. WP:DIACRITICS. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 14:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Londonderry North (Dail Eireann constituency)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) I am listing this merely because it is called different things and was hard fought over. It is probably a keep but eubot has mangled the spellings on both sides. It is something of a prejudicial redirect and we can do without it. To be clear, I am not Irish, north or south. Si Trew (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
TuerkTelekom
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
another tuerkish one from a buerk, eubot Si Trew (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. I'm seeing lots of uses of "Tuerk Telekom" but essentially nothing in English in CamelCase. Thryduulf (talk) 14:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
AEschines
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(technical) eubot creation of course. I can't technically mark this as R to DAB, and I can't mark it as R from other name. Keep it probably but a weak delete for now. Si Trew (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Kevaet
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) not Germanic but Finnish. Si Trew (talk) 19:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While I'm getting a large number of google searches, they are in a whole host of languages and from what I can make out relate to a whole host of different subjects, so while I'm not sure if this is getting proper English uses or not, if it is there doesn't seem to be a primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 14:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Redirect sn
Studio 4degC
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. I have changed the RCAT accordingly. -- Tavix (talk) 18:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think that is an odd way to translate the degree sign, but I am probably in a minority. I would write as an engineer "4 deg C" and so on, but this is pushing it. Eubot, of course. Si Trew (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but this is
R from ASCII-only
not R to diacritics
. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Shhhnotsoloud. This gets uses as an exact phrase in the real world, and even more when only "4degC" and context are required. e.g. the twitter profile seems to be "@4degC". Thryduulf (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:R sn
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:XY and WP:R#ASTONISH. Could refer to ((R from sort name)), ((R from scientific name)), ((R from surname)), ((R from systematic name)), and others. Mr. Guye (talk) 19:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is a special type of redirect called a "shortcut", and there are dozens, perhaps more, of harmless shortcuts outside of mainspace that do not adhere to WP:XY. Not sure where the nom wanted the second link to go, but WP:ASTONISH provides for least surprise for article readers, not for editors, who use shortcuts like this all the time. If we really want to delete shortcuts like this, we can start here and have a field day, and then go here, here and here and have a real ball. Paine Ellsworth put'r there 00:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - policy compliant redirect; with 21 harmless transclusions and no hint of astonishment thereby.--John Cline (talk) 00:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Guel Goelge
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) Not Germanic but Turkish. WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Si Trew (talk) 19:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find evidence this is used outside Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Zuerich model
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) this model is so well-known, I would have thought, that people would search for "Zurich" not "Zuerich". I could be wrong, though, Si Trew (talk) 19:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. While Zurich model is undoubtedly more common, this is also used and as redirects are cheap and wiki is not paper there is no problem having both. Thryduulf (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pansarvarnskanon m/38
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think another eubot nonsense, maybe ask at WP:MILHIST. All I can find in the article is in the references as "1938". Patently a 37mm gun will not take an m/38. May have been a misspelling that eubot created it from. Si Trew (talk) 19:02, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- ec comment by eubot is redirected "Pansarvärnskanon m/38" straight. Si Trew (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pukinmaeki railway station
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) not mentioned in any ledes and targets since i have to do WP:BEFORE it seems, can't seem to find this anywhere. I don't see really why I have to do "BEFORE" on things that were patently made up by a bot without any thought, that is a straight blue pencil (editing). Deliberately I don't check outside Wikipedia because things tend to go in circles. Si Trew (talk) 18:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- You have to do WP:BEFORE because sometimes the bot did get it right, or the bot got it wrong but the best solution is something other than deletion - in addition to all the usual reasons WP:BEFORE is not optional. Thryduulf (talk) 15:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. On this occasion the bot was completely wrong, but the time spent checking was not wasted. Thryduulf (talk) 15:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
AEther (disambiguation)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
strangely this is a eubot creation and the target has it anyway. It is not a disambiguation page, I think that's a fairly straight Delete. Si Trew (talk) 18:49, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (weak). AE would be a way of writing the ligature Æ (although why anyone would then put (disambiguation) after it as a search term is beyond me). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If someone is looking for an article that they know or suspect is not the primary topic for their search term, but don't know what title it is at, then searching for "topic (disambiguation)" will take them straight to the dab page rather than navigating via an article they don't want. This is the case whatever term you are looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Second Battle of Inoenue
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. Closing in conjunction with Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 20#First Battle of Inoenue. -- Tavix (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It was not fought in a Germanic language, it was fought in Turkey. More Eubot WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Si Trew (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. While I'm not finding anything relevant as an exact phrase, "Inoenue" is a spelling used at times for the settlement, e.g. [6] so it's not implausible someone would search for this. Thryduulf (talk) 17:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Inoenue is a used transliteration for the battle and the president. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Access (c)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Keep . [Keep plausible redirect as "©" may be difficult for some to type.] Jax 0677 (talk) 23:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Back-formed by eubot from Access © in the lede. While (c) is a standard way to do that when you haven't the copyright symbol, I am not sure this makes a good redirect. 741 on User:Champion/Eubot_list_10. Si Trew (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep as "Access ©" is the operating name of the subject and so it's far from implausible for this to be rendered as "Access (c)" in ASCII-only environments and other situations where "ⓒ" is unavailable or difficult to produce. This is weak only because Access ⓒ is red. Thryduulf (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as that ascii attempt to make the copyright symbol. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per AngusWOOF and create Access ⓒ.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Plattdueuetsch
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
another eubot implausible back-formation. Probably it can be found in some source somewhere, probably from copied from Wikipedia. Not in article, WP:RFD#D2 confusing. The dueueu is the giveaway. The lede lists many spellings in various languages. This isn't one of them Si Trew (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is well used, in sources that did not originate with Wikipedia, but none of those sources are in English - most are presumably Low German (some look German, others look Dutch). Thryduulf (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Erkki-Sven Tueuer
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. Evidence of usage has been found. -- Tavix (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot)... that's pushing it... WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Si Trew (talk) 18:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is the spelling used on his author page at Amazon [7] among other uses. Thryduulf (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
United Kingdom general election, 2020
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 May 2#United Kingdom general election, 2020
!Hola!
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix (talk) 01:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) I am not sure you can do that in English. Si Trew (talk) 12:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's the other way around: The "¡" at the target is not used in English, thus the reason why the English Wikipedia needs this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The exclamation point is on the opposite side with its spanish counterpart. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I know that, thanks Steely and Trucker, I know that meself. I just couldn't remember the consensus. Thanks for adding to it. Keep and Withdrawn as above. Si Trew (talk) 18:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Goerele
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix (talk) 01:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Created by eubot. Si Trew (talk) 12:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Gets used as a transliteration in various European languages as seen through a simple Google Books search which should've been down as part of WP:BEFORE. [8] ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I cannot do BEFORE on every single bit of nonsense Eubot has made. Keep and Withdrawn. Si Trew (talk) 18:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
'en
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy keep. The nominator has not put forward a reason for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(eubot) I think the consensus is to keep on these ones, but is a bit far out. Probably OK. Si Trew (talk) 11:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Leon, Leon
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
well this is the kind of thing that eubot came up with. It is probably a keep. It doesnt say spain and it isnt spelled right, and it doesnt fit the pattern that WP:GEO does for names, bbut well really WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Si Trew (talk) 11:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Leheo, Greece
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not at target as "Leheo", we have I believe standard spellings for geographic names and nonstandard ones but I think this is a bit way out. I know people search in different ways. Still, Wikipedia has a reputation for being wrong. I suppose I am saying WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Si Trew (talk) 11:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Gets use, as seen through a Google Books search [9] that could easily have been done as part of WP:BEFORE. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:14, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Patar knight. @SimonTrew: no matter how much you dislike it, WP:BEFORE is not optional. It's taken me essentially all my Wikipedia time today to go through just this one page of nominations from you, and most of them I'm recommending be kept for reasons that would have been obvious had you looked. Particularly as you claim to be evaluating hundreds of others you don't nominate, there is no way you are putting the appropriate effort in to these nominations. If you were getting near 100% of nominations deleted by consensus I might take a different view, but when 50% is the upper bound it's not acceptable. Slow down. There is no deadline. The project will not suffer at all if the few redirects that should be deleted hang around longer, but every time something is deleted that shouldn't be the encyclopaedia suffers damage. Thryduulf (talk) 22:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Troeegs Brewing Company
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Troeegs brewery is definitely not the name of an american brewery. WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Si Trew (talk) 11:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Based on Google search results such as [10] it seems that "Troeegs Brewing Company" is how the organisation's name is rendered on US Customs records. It's quite likely therefore that other organisations render it the same way. Thryduulf (talk) 22:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Thryduulf. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ucaen script
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure.This is not the name of this script so I am not sure how Eubot managed it. Presumably from a german umlaut Si Trew (talk) 11:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Shockingly, transliterations used in a major academic language with a rich history in archaeology and other humanities work like German do get use. [11] ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- To try to put it plainly. I am going through thousands of these and knocking most to keep, retargeting, redirecting, and so on. I do not have time to do RS or used in sources if we are ever going to get through them. My job, as I see it, is to get through the lists as a librarian and indexer and say does that make any sense. I have to bring everything here for RfD because we do not have any kind -of WP:X1 concession. So when I toss them in RfD's direction, I have had some thought about them, but admittedly not much. Si Trew (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- It takes maybe 30 seconds to run a term into Google Books/Scholar and seeing what kind of hits you get. This is not a burdensome request and is expected of people making XfD nominations.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If you don't have time to "do RS or used in sources" then you need to stop doing something else so you do have time - this is not optional. No ifs, no buts, this is not optional. There is no deadline. Thryduulf (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Steen & Strom
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Listing only at RfD because we had this discussion and they were keep. Listing it becaue on Eubot list 10 and will catch up with it. We had this discussion, went keep I think mostly. Si Trew (talk) 11:22, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- And I have to list and keep and throw away things quickly. I cannot do RS and so on. I can only bring them to your attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonTrew (talk • contribs) 11:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Plausible redirect for those who can't type Ø/ø. Sam Sailor 21:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ooku (film)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 26#Ooku (film)
Gyoergy Luntzer
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 May 1#Gyoergy Luntzer
42eme Rallye Automobile de Monte-Carlo
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 11:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does the 42eme make any sense in English' (eubot) Si Trew (talk) 11:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Well it is kinda [[WP::FORRED]]. Eubot has taken of the diacritics but not translated... you get what I mean... 11:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Foldes Ferenc Gimnazium
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
this may be too far apart from Hungarian, probably ok in English, but an English gymnasium is not a school. Not sure. Gymnasium does not meen "school" in English, this is on the cusp, this one. Si Trew (talk) 11:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Well it is a mixed language redirect. WP:FORRED. To then knock off the dias which are important in Hungarian it is not Gimnazium it is Gímnaziúm you just well it makes my eyes water. This is a back formation by User:Eubot. Si Trew (talk) 11:14, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Grosse Maedchen weinen nicht
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Keep. [Keep per WP:DIACRITICS.] Jax 0677 (talk) 17:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
iT IS NOT the same name without diacritics, as the rtag has it. Not sure what to do with this one. Si Trew (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bjoern Andersson (handballer)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Keep . [Standard transliteration for Swedish.] Jax 0677 (talk) 17:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am listing this only because of the recent discussion about Byork or Byerk. Otherwise I would keep it as standard Swedish as consensus has for these ones. Si Trew (talk) 10:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Jaime Sanchez(actor)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. The same will go for Jaime Sánchez(actor). -- Tavix (talk) 18:19, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
this is iffy only for the lacking space in the disambig Si Trew (talk) 10:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- eubot forgot to say — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonTrew (talk • contribs)
- Delete. Consensus is that missing spaces between title and disambiguator are not useful. Thryduulf (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not useful to have a dab without the space. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mando-cuembues
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:18, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The eu eu from turkik to germanic is a bit nonsense. WP:RFD#D2 confusing. Si Trew (talk) 09:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete & listing for admin closure. Cheers, FriyMan talk 09:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of use that did not originate at Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 22:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Baeksang Arts Awards x
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Unopposed creator request to delete a redirect from a clear error. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is a stray "x" at the end of the title, making it a typo. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Please delete it. Sorry for creating it.Jjaey (talk) 03:14, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Will do. Thanks for saying. Si Trew (talk) 08:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Someone is ahead of me. On its way. Si Trew (talk) 08:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Five pillars
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:18, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-procedural renomination per the outcome of the previous RFD - all incoming links have been removed, and thus this redirect is unnecessary. The other two are being nominated because they're in the same relative boat (i.e. someone goofed). Primefac (talk) 01:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.