The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete hyphenated. redirect others to art.. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Art-designs → Art director  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Art-designing → Art director  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Art-designers → Art director  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Art-designer → Art director  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Art-design → Art director  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Art designs → Art director  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Art designing → Art director  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Art designers → Art director  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Art designer → Art director  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm not certain that an art designer and an art director are the same thing Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete some hyphenated search items aren't useful. Redirect the rest to Art as with Art design. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect per AngusWOOF. Neelix special creations. Legacypac (talk) 22:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment note that Art and design redirects to graphic design, although that may be too specific as there are many "art and design" schools that cover both topics and not just graphic design, so it's a bit of an WP:XY. Another redirect option is Design#Design and art. But it isn't specific to the leading position of an art director. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with AngusWOOF. Until we get something better at the title Art design, Art is our best target. - Richard Cavell (talk) 05:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• I've been wavering as to what to do with these, but I don't think Art would be the correct target. Where does "Art" discuss the concept of an "art designer"? While the current target isn't an exact match, I do feel it's the closest we've got. (That is by no means a ringing endorsement of the status quo either.) -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Lake Elsman. Deryck C. 11:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Elsman → 2017 Times Square car crash  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Lake Elsman also exists. Redirect could be a DAB, but I just recommend a simple delete. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please, I don't watch pages) 04:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not enough to assume the entire last name. If you want to dab / set index this with entries for Lake Elsman and Alyssa Elsman that would work too. That was what was done with Eisman. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC) updated 01:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC) updated 21:26, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Lake Elsman, only notable use. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:04, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Tavix as the other use isn't redirect-worthy. – Uanfala 19:30, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete the first two. Keep the last two per Tavix. Ruslik_Zero 18:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• NASDAQ:WSTF → Westaff  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• NFI.UN → New Flyer Industries  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• NYSE:CVC → Altice USA  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• NYSE:NYX → NYSE Euronext  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete These are not the stock symbols for these companies. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete misleading Legacypac (talk) 10:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• I would keep the NYSE:CVC one since it was for the Cablevision Systems Corporation that evolved to the present day Altice USA company. If not, though, then we should go to the Cablevision page itself. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget NYSE:CVC to Cablevision where the ticker is mentioned. Keep NYSE:NYX, it's explained at NYSE Euronext#NYSE and Archipelago Holdings. Delete the other two due to lack of mention. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. It has been established through the course of this discussion that the current target technically isn't correct, and that there isn't an acceptable alternative target. I have no prejudice against recreation to a reliably sourced target that mentions the term, should someone want to the required research. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:16, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Bâreqath → Carbuncle (gemstone)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect appears to be incorrect. I'm finding very little information on this word, but what I have found suggest that it actually means emerald [1], while carbuncle usually refers to garnets. Some help from someone knowledgeable in Hebrew or the Old Testament would be helpful here. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• From the linked text it appears that there isn't scholarly consensus on the exact meaning of the word. If it's not completely known which gemstone it referred to then we shouldn't redirect it to any. List of precious stones in the Bible could be expanded with relevant content (particularly the section on emeralds, which already discusses what looks like the root from which bareqath has been derived), but until that happens I don't see the point of having a redirect. – Uanfala 13:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Dab? Britannica discusses this under the Emerald subject where the word is associated with carbuncle Authorized Version and emerald in the Revised Version of the Septuagint [2] Here's some Bible lexicons [3]. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think there's anything to disambiguate between: as far as I can imagine, bareqath isn't ever going to be used to refer to either emeralds or carbuncles, it's only found in the arcane contexts of Bible studies. Your links however can be used to add (further) relevant content to List of precious stones in the Bible, where this could be redirected. – Uanfala 10:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. I assume there's consensus to delete now that the history has been merged. Note that there is no longer any non-trivial history at the time of deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Shippig Companies → List of freight ship companies  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Unlikely misspelling, especially when combined with the non-standard capitalization. (but consider maintaining edit history, since there was a cut-and-paste merge) UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep likely misspelling actually 2602:306:378E:1930:F1B9:389F:DC72:1139 (talk) 07:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It was a parallel version of List of ship companies, itself was split by the creator of List of Shippig Companies, making List of Shippig Companies became a redirect to List of freight ship companies (but inherit the page formatting). Just need a way to keep page history and a need of redirect. Matthew_hk tc 11:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  For the prior, an admin could easily execute a histmerge (can be requested at WP:RMT). Lordtobi (✉) 11:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything in the history worth keeping though? It appears to be just a list of companies that could be easily compiled if given the proper sources. I don't see extensive discussion on the subject unless that was what was deleted from the talk page? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note the properly spelled List of shipping companies redirect exists. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an implausible typo and an unusual capitalisation. The redirect did have article content for the period of about four hours back in 2007, and that content was cut-and-pasted into List of shipping companies [4]. But as this was performed by the page's creator (and sole contributor) I don't see the requirement for preserving the history for attribution. – Uanfala 09:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• F(x) (band 2) → F(x) (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Rather useless disambiguator. Steel1943 (talk) 04:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Its history suggests that this was created in error. – Uanfala 10:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. "Band 2" isn't a good disambiguator. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:16, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Timeline of the Wars of the Arab Winter: Iraq → Iraqi Civil War (2014–present)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Timeline of the Wars of the Arab Winter: ISIS → Iraqi Civil War (2014–present)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible search terms that read more like a book titles than Wikipedia articles. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:38, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete 2nd, leaning delete 1st While the article does contain a timeline, it doesn't split out ISIS participation, so one isn't going to get what the second link promises. The first is, I would agree, something that is unlikely to be entered. Mangoe (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comparative studies of human rights record of countries → Human rights  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not discussed in article, or anywhere else in Wikipedia for that matter. Delete.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  00:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per above, and unlikely POV fork search term. Triptothecottage (talk) 00:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Overly descriptive title that I can't think of a suitable target for. This was created as a one-sentence stub back in 2003, but there's no content there worth preserving. – Uanfala 10:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There are research groups and organizations that compile such comparative records, like with Human_rights_in_Islamic_countries#International_Human_Rights_Rank_Indicator but no article that has amassed the most notable ones. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.