The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Right to property. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Right to exclude → Property law  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target article, so the reader seeking the definition of the term is left none the wiser. I'm not a legal scholar but this strikes me as a concept that could plausibly be notable in its own right, so WP:RDEL #10 would apply. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to property, which explains that owners of property have the right to "exclude others" from doing certain things to that property. The property law article definitely needs some work, and it could also be a plausible target, but I think property is better for now. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 20:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC) Update: I have struck my earlier vote because I think CoffeeWithMarkets's suggestion is better. I agree that this should target right to property. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect but to 'Right to property' given that the legal framework of 'ability to exclude' has been viewed as an inherent part of property rights by many reliable sources (see here) CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 04:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 2018 government shitdown → United States federal government shutdown of 2018  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• 2013 government shitdown → United States federal government shutdown of 2013  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is really just an "implausible typo/misnomer". This is really a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that I don't see any use for. Just because the "I" key is next to the "U" key is not a reason for a redirect to be created, nor does it make it a "plausible typo". I stand by the R3 nomination fully. SkyWarrior 22:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, because the redirect serves no purpose and takes away from Wikipedia's professionalism as I noted at Special:Diff/821835555. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - 2018 government shutdown doesn't exist as a redirect at the time of this vote, so having a misspelled version of that as a redirect is ridiculous. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 00:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This is an attempt to draw from Wikipedia's professionalism, and the term has nothing to do with the actual article besides being a change of wording. --Kirbanzo (talk) 00:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I assume this was intended as a joke, it adds nothing Wikipedia. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Keep per WP:CHEAP as a plausible misspelling. These redirects were kept after speedy deletion, while "Government shitdown" and "shitdown" were deleted without an RFD while these two were kept after speedy deletion. 2018 government shutdown exists now. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  I counter your WP:CHEAP argument with WP:COSTLY. It would argue that such a misspelling would be unlikely to happen, at least not on a regular basis, and as such does not need a redirect. SkyWarrior 14:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the second word it is a typo I have seen before. It also has some currency as a satirical expression. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  
• Delete as promoting MOS:NEO. If most of the news agencies are calling it that and self-censoring, like sh*tdown, then reconsider. But it might be just a handful of biased sites. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not particularly plausible outside of redirecting every single possible way someone could use the wrong vowel in the spelling of a word (which we should not do, to be clear.) Sergecross73 msg me 18:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Humorous but unlikely typo. JOEBRO64 18:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Gratuitously offensive and loaded. Unlikely and implausible search term. Sjakkalle (Check!) 20:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It is a plausible typo. Those letters are right beside each other on a conventional keyboard. Just because there is a swear word does not mean the typo is implausible. groig (talk) 21:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep mostly based on WP:CHEAP. But, my real reason for commenting here is to point out that while government shitdown is trending on google, it's also an unmeasurably small (i.e. rounds off to 0) fraction of searches for government shutdown. Redirects are not my field of wiki-expertise, so I have no idea how that relates to our policy. FWIW, shitdown comes up with zero hits on the NYTimes internal search. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  If there are practically zero hits on a search, then that would mean that such a misspelling is not likely to happen, and a redirect is not needed. SkyWarrior 22:56, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not a particularly plausible typo. Lepricavark (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as being implausible, and objectively useless. ToThAc (talk) 01:08, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Besides being a rather implausible typo ... I can't stop thinking that this redirect represents some sort of fundraiser where members of the government take dumps for charity. (Yay sense of humor.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia isn't supposed to censor swear words, but that doesn't make it a place to put up Sailorese humor in a non-educational context either. MrHumanPersonGuy (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, these are not plausible typos, and the sophomoric humour that comes from having redirects from swears isn't a good enough reason to keep them. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G7, obvious typo -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 19:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 1912 Queensland state electon → Queensland state election, 1912  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, implausible typo, no links to it. Iffy★Chat -- 21:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Bizarre nomination. They're two very obvious ways of phrasing the same thing (With the redirect arguably being the more common one). There are no links to it because we've avoided the redirects, but it's a totally obvious link someone might enter looking for that article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm guessing you missed the typo, the word "election" is mis-spelt in the redirect. I probably should have made it clearer when posting the nomination where the typo was. Iffy★Chat -- 21:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Well, it's not an implausible typo since clearly I mistyped it when I created the redirect in the first place :-) But yes it wasn't my intention and can be deleted. I note that the correctly-spelt 1912 Queensland state election redirect exists and is used. Kerry (talk) 02:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Kb.au (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 2 screen → Nintendo DS  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Far too vague to redirect to any article. There are plenty of other electronics with 2 screens. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate or delete - something this broad should be a disambiguation page or just be deleted (likely the latter). --Kirbanzo (talk) 00:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. This isn't Dual Screen which is a dab to Multi-monitor and Nintendo DS. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Nintendo *DS* Lite → Nintendo DS Lite  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems like an implausible typo that was just created as a fork of the main article until being redirected. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unlikely search term, not a valid alternate spelling. Sergecross73 msg me 18:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I can't see people using this as a search term. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unused stylization of DS AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:32, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Nintendo DS Cracked Hinges → Nintendo DS Lite  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article mentions nothing about cracked hinges. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it should? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]

• Delete as Yelp-like coverage and lack of WP:WEIGHT AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The Moon Zone → Sonic Advance  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Many games have a Moon level or zone, like DuckTales. There's no reason to redirect this to this article, or any article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom. Vague name of something unlikely to be searched for in the first place. Sergecross73 msg me 18:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (levels) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I agree. We shouldn't keep this. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Consider this a group closure for the three List of Final Fantasy location nominations. There was slightly different discussion, but it does not make sense for them to have differing results, noting that nobody explicitly suggested such. This is without prejudice against someone restoring the list and nominating at AfD if they desire. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Final Fantasy V locations → Final Fantasy V  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

As usual, Setting section is not a list, this redirect is unnecessary. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore this revision of List of Final Fantasy V locations, then send to WP:AFD. This is yet another case of a ((R with history)) that was blanked and redirected without a WP:AFD discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 13:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lets not wasted a bunch of editor time by restoring a 10-year-old article revision only to turn around and delete it. I appreciate that this redirect did not follow some policy or another that mandates that we never, ever get rid of fancruft without making sure it takes a lot of time, but trying to retroactively fix process violations from the past decade is a complete waste of time for everyone involved. --PresN 18:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree that my suggestion is a waste of time, considering that if I thought it was a waste of time, I would have never suggested it. RfD is not the place where judgement calls should be made on former content of such a magnitude hiding in the edit history of a redirect. RfD is for forming consensus regarding the usefulness of the redirect itself ... which essentially has nothing to do with article content in the redirect's edit history. AfD is more equipped with editors and a process for forming consensus on the content in the edit history ... considering that the page in the edit history was an article. Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore per Steel1943, plausible article needs discussion in AfD. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC) (closer note two other similar discussions (on other list of xyz locations with same comments on this page)[reply]
• Keep. Don't see how the article would be kept at AFD, and the current target does present some of the information sought. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Or keep per patar knight; definitely not delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Consider this a group closure for the three List of Final Fantasy location nominations. There was slightly different discussion, but it does not make sense for them to have differing results, noting that nobody explicitly suggested such. This is without prejudice against someone restoring the list and nominating at AfD if they desire. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Final Fantasy IV locations → Final Fantasy IV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of Final Fantasy IV Locations → Final Fantasy IV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Yet again, Setting section has no list, making this redirect unnecessary. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore this revision of List of Final Fantasy IV locations, retarget List of Final Fantasy IV Locations to List of Final Fantasy IV locations, then send List of Final Fantasy IV locations to WP:AFD. This is yet another case of a ((R with history)) that was blanked and redirected without a WP:AFD discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 13:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lets not wasted a bunch of editor time by restoring a 10-year-old article revision only to turn around and delete it. I appreciate that this redirect did not follow some policy or another that mandates that we never, ever get rid of fancruft without making sure it takes a lot of time, but trying to retroactively fix process violations from the past decade is a complete waste of time for everyone involved. --PresN 18:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree that my suggestion is a waste of time, considering that if I thought it was a waste of time, I would have never suggested it. RfD is not the place where judgement calls should be made on former content of such a magnitude hiding in the edit history of a redirect. RfD is for forming consensus regarding the usefulness of the redirect itself ... which essentially has nothing to do with article content in the redirect's edit history. AfD is more equipped with editors and a process for forming consensus on the content in the edit history ... considering that the page in the edit history was an article. Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore per Steel1943, plausible article needs discussion in AfD. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC) (closer note two other similar discussions (on other list of xyz locations with same comments on this page)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Consider this a group closure for the three List of Final Fantasy location nominations. There was slightly different discussion, but it does not make sense for them to have differing results, noting that nobody explicitly suggested such. This is without prejudice against someone restoring the list and nominating at AfD if they desire. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Final Fantasy III locations → Final Fantasy III  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The setting section has no list of locations. Superfluous redirect. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore this revision of List of Final Fantasy III locations, then send to WP:AFD. This is yet another case of a ((R with history)) that was blanked and redirected without a WP:AFD discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 13:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lets not wasted a bunch of editor time by restoring a 10-year-old article revision only to turn around and delete it. I appreciate that this redirect did not follow some policy or another that mandates that we never, ever get rid of fancruft without making sure it takes a lot of time, but trying to retroactively fix process violations from the past decade is a complete waste of time for everyone involved. --PresN 18:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree that my suggestion is a waste of time, considering that if I thought it was a waste of time, I would have never suggested it. RfD is not the place where judgement calls should be made on former content of such a magnitude hiding in the edit history of a redirect. RfD is for forming consensus regarding the usefulness of the redirect itself ... which essentially has nothing to do with article content in the redirect's edit history. AfD is more equipped with editors and a process for forming consensus on the content in the edit history ... considering that the page in the edit history was an article. Steel1943 (talk) 21:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Revert to the article version and send to WP:AFD per User:Steel1943. WP:RFD shouldn't be used to discretely delete articles. That's the purpose of WP:AFD. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore per Steel1943, plausible article needs discussion in AfD. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC) (closer note two other similar discussions (on other list of xyz locations with same comments on this page)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Absent evidence of bad faith, I don't see anything procedurally wrong about deleting such a redirect. This has been a redirect for over a decade (!) without apparent complaint. As for the substance, the article seems like it was a blatant WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE violator. If it were taken to AfD, deletion seems quite likely. --BDD (talk) 18:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd still say weak keep on merits as a redirect as harmless redirect targeting to where one can find the most information. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Don't see how the article could be kept, so I would prefer to just keep it without going to AFD. While the current article doesn't have a dedicated list section, it does cover many locations within the game, so the information sought is somewhat there. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Paunline (Nintendo character) → List of Mario franchise characters#Pauline  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Paunline" is an unlikely misspelling. (Note: the redirect has edit history, but it all looks like the result of a cut-and-paste move or fork from Pauline (Nintendo) that was eventually reverted.) Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unlikely misspelling. Sergecross73 msg me 18:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I agree. This appears pretty useless. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:17, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Very implausible typo. ToThAc (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and housekeeping. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Mario monsters → List of Mario franchise characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Calling the subjects in the target "monsters" is wrong/misleading. Also, per the redirect' edit history, it seems that the subject of this redirect is an unnotable web site made by a third party, almost like a wiki for antagonists in the Mario series. Steel1943 (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The scope seems different than just characters, should be deleted to avoid confusion._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as nom states, "Mario monsters" is not a common phrase to describe any subset of its characters. Sergecross73 msg me 18:37, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not a common phrase, as noted above. Lepricavark (talk) 16:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Na2Cr2O → Sodium dichromate  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect should not link to Sodium dichromate as it is not the correct chemical formula for Sodium dichromate. This redirect was nominated at WP:Articles for deletion/Na2Cr2O by @WhittleMario: and this nomination is on their behalf. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 16:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I know I am biased as the person who nominated this, but Na₂Cr₂O is a highly unlikely misspelling of Na₂Cr₂O₇. --WhittleMario (talk) 17:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The halo games → Halo (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible search term. Gets barely any pageviews as a redirect. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as the page views stats showed, it rare gets any usage. Sergecross73 msg me 18:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• The Delete Votes per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo (series → Halo (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible typo with very few page views. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This type of redirect is specifically called out on WP:COSTLY as a type of redirect that should be deleted. --WhittleMario (talk) 17:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per precedent at Georgia (U.S. state and Democratic party USA). I don't like those precedents, but if we want to overturn them, it will require a centralized discussion outside RfD. --NYKevin 22:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. This isn't worth keeping unless it's an article that purposely uses a open parenthesiis. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Killiondude (talk) 06:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo Recruit → Halo (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Halo: Recruit → Halo (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It is mentioned at the target now. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • In that case I retract this particular nomination, an admin can close it at their earliest convenience._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo Scarab → Halo (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not at all mentioned in the target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete although there are a ton of different things called Scarab in the Halo series, there isn't any decent section to point to. Best to leave it to Wikia to explain the WP:GAMECRUFT (#7, lists of weapons) [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodensuperman (talk • contribs) 13:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Paul Gillette → The Cat o' Nine Tails  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Confusing redirect as individual is not mentioned at target. He seems to have written a number of novels, the novelization for this film being just one of them. [2] --woodensuperman 15:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I've turned it into a writer stub using info in the LA Times obituary. Passes WP:GNG In ictu oculi (talk) 17:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Bob-Ulk → List of recurring Mario franchise enemies#Bob-omb  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The subject of this redirect is not mentioned at its target. The subject of the redirect is an enemy character exclusive to Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door, but it's not mentioned there either. Since it's a random unnotable enemy in a RPG-style game, it's inclusion in Wikipedia would essentially be a WP:GAMEGUIDE violation. Steel1943 (talk) 14:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Only shows up in one game, and in one area within that one game, no less? This seems like a pointless bit of trivia even if we had detailed information at the targeted page, which we don't anyways. I agree. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Gumba Mario Enemies → List of Mario franchise characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The misspelling of the word "Goomba" is too unlikely. Steel1943 (talk) 13:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - agree that there's too many bizarre parts here to make it a likely search term. (Misspelling of Goomba, randomly tagging "mario enemies" at the end, the fact that its plural and not singular, etc.) Sergecross73 msg me 18:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The history on Halo → Halo (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The grammar of this redirect is too poor to be plausible. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no other articles with "The history on". They are usually "The history of". Also, since there are no articles detailing the history of the franchise besides the franchise article itself, this would raise false expectations. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Halo#Fictional entities. Killiondude (talk) 05:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo (character) → Master Chief (Halo)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While humorous, this is plain misleading as a redirect. I'm sure anyone looking for "that guy from Halo" can navigate to the series page and read a few sentences in. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Halo#Fictional entities as there are multiple characters named Halo. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Halo#Fictional entities per AngusWOOF. Steel1943 (talk) 03:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo 3 achievements → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Beyond the mere fact that the game has achievements (something shared by countless other games), nothing about them are mentioned in the target article. Unnecessary redirect. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:GAMEGUIDE AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo 3 recon armor → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Halo 3 armor → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-notable WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (gameplay items) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Field Major (Halo 3) → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at all in the target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Not mentioned as a character. Could be a specific unit in the game, but no mention means no retarget. WP:GAMEGUIDE AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The Halo 3 Game → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible search term. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not a formal title and unnecessary "The" and "Game" AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Slice 'n' Dice → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This term is so strongly associated with cutting appliances used during cooking (the as-seen-on-TV things) that I was thinking of proposing that as a retarget option. However, we don't have 'chopping appliance' or 'cutting appliance' or anything like it on Wikipedia that I can see. I suppose WP:REDLINK applies then. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:34, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per CWM. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 05:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete created as an achievement in the game. WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (achievements) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo 3 Delay → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No "delay" is mentioned in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. WP:GAMECRUFT #9 (rumors and speculation) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I agree. This seems useless. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Confirmed Halo 3 Elements → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Needless to say the time for this to be deleted for WP:CRYSTALBALL has long passed, so now it should just be deleted as implausible. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I agree. This is useless. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (gameplay items concepts) #9 (rumors and speculation) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not sure it was ever plausible, but especially not now, many years after its release. Sergecross73 msg me 18:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Bubble Shield → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Bubble barrier → Halo 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No way this term isn't too vague not to redirect here. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, terms are too vague to justify redirecting to a single series. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this isn't unique to Halo 3. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Ascension (Halo 2) → Halo 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Yet again, not mentioned at all in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom WP:GAMECRUFT non-notable multiplayer map AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Warlock (Halo 2) → Halo 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm guessing it's the callsign of one of the characters, but it's not mentioned at all in the target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It's a custom map. WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (names of levels) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The guardians (halo 2) → Halo 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Guardians are mentioned in the main series article, and are also the subtitle of Halo 5. But nothing's special about the guardians in this title that would warrant a redirect. WP:GAMECRUFT AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Relic (Halo Map) → Halo 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete.as non-notable custom map. WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (names of levels) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Team Snipers (Halo) → Halo 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete.as non-notable gameplay detail, not described in the Halo (video game)#Multiplayer section. WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (gameplay concept) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Weapons in Halo 2 → Halo 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is no such list of weapons in the target article, unnecessary redirect. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (list of weapons) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo energy sword → Halo 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as WP:GAMECRUFT #7 non-notable weapon AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Team slayer → Halo 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete.as non-notable gameplay detail, not described in the Halo (video game)#Multiplayer section. WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (gameplay concept) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.