The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Woolwich Arsenal F.C. → Arsenal F.C.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't see any use of this redirect. Woolwich Arsenal has nothing to do with Arsenal F.C. It is unlikely people with confuse Arsenal F.C with Woolwich Arsenal. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:42, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, immediately as I understood the connection. Apologies. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Texas caviar. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 10:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Cowboy caviar → Rocky Mountain oysters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - Cowboy Caviar is a popular [1] salsa of avocado, tomato, corn and black beans. The connection to bull's testicles is archaic. ghost 17:42, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Texas caviar, hatnote to Rocky Mountain oysters The press shows Texas caviar as more prominent name [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] but some press do refer to the rocky mountain oysters [7] [8] [9] This appears to be two dabs for now. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added cowboy caviar term to the Texas one so both terms meet MOS:DABMENTION AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Texas caviar per AngusWOOF --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Chemical explosive#Sensitiser. Not much of a discussion, but I don't see consensus to delete so something had to happen. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:57, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Explosive sensitiser → Explosive material  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It's an implausible redirect. There is no mention of a 'sensitiser' at all in the article Explosive. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it was created by Neelix and there is no mention of 'sensitiser' at all in the article that it is being redirected to. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Chemical explosive#Sensitiser. The current target does have one relevant sentence, under Chemical: "A sensitizer such as powdered aluminum may be added to an explosive to increase the energy of the detonation." But the section at the Chemical explosive article seems more useful. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:32, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment note that Sensitizer which is a disambiguation, would also have to be modified if it will go to Chemical explosive rather than Explosive material / Explosive. Also there is something called a "chemical sensitizer" that could be confusing. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep the 10 identified by Thryduulf, delete the rest. I've verified that there's still content on those 10, and not on the others. --BDD (talk) 16:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 1027 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1028 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1030 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1032 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1034 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1035 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1036 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1037 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1038 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1040 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1050 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1070 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1080 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1090 (number) → 1000 (number)#1001 to 1099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1110 (number) → 1000 (number)#1100 to 1199  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1120 (number) → 1000 (number)#1100 to 1199  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1130 (number) → 1000 (number)#1100 to 1199  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1140 (number) → 1000 (number)#1100 to 1199  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1150 (number) → 1000 (number)#1100 to 1199  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1160 (number) → 1000 (number)#1100 to 1199  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1170 (number) → 1000 (number)#1100 to 1199  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1180 (number) → 1000 (number)#1100 to 1199  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1190 (number) → 1000 (number)#1100 to 1199  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1350 (number) → 1000 (number)#1300 to 1399  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1400 (number) → 1000 (number)#1400 to 1499  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1450 (number) → 1000 (number)#1400 to 1499  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1500 (number) → 1000 (number)#1500 to 1599  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1550 (number) → 1000 (number)#1500 to 1599  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1700 (number) → 1000 (number)#1700 to 1799  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1800 (number) → 1000 (number)#1800 to 1899  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 1900 (number) → 1000 (number)#1900 to 1999  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Recently created redirects, created semi-automatically. If a redirect were to be created at these locations, this would be the correct target, but there seems no reason to create the redirect. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep those that have content at the target, i.e. currently 1027, 1028, 1035, 1080, 1140, 1170, 1190, 1350, 1800 and 1900. Weak delete those that do not, unless content is added. Thryduulf (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep/delete. If there is content on that specific number at the target, keep it. If not, it is confusing and should be deleted. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep 1080 and multiples of 100; neutral to weak keep the rest. Someone might think that there is an article for 1000-1099, 1100-1199, 1200-1299, etc., and this even might eventually happen. Also, multiples of 100 are more important than most other numbers. For "neutral to weak keep", more abundant numbers (like multiples of 24 and 30) are on the "weak keep" side, while primes and semiprimes are on the "neutral" side. 1080 has enough small prime factors that I included it in "strong keep".HotdogPi 18:56, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 13:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Costa del Crime → Costa del Sol  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure if should be a redirect at all PoliceSheep99 (talk) 00:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (and perhaps refine to Costa del Sol#Late 1970s onwards) per WP:RNEUTRAL (if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral) and its explicit mention at the target. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - common term in the UK - Guardian, Telegraph, New Statesman. SilkTork (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per SilkTork. I'm neutral about refining. Thryduulf (talk) 17:05, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• List of disparaging nicknames for settlements was created because redirects like this kept popping up here. --BDD (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per SilkTork. --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.