The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• C19H15Cl2O4 → Rebamipide  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

C19H15Cl2O4 was created by mistake: formula of Rebamipide is C19H15ClN2O4. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C₁₉H₁₅Cl₂O₄. I propose to delete it. (C19H15ClN2O4 is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 23:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This redirect was apparently created in error. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom & Ed. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per CSD G3 by 2405:9800:BA30:C21A:B401:FE10:B77F:3D57 (talk) 05:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A mistake is not vandalism so G3 doesn't seem to apply. Also the "vandalism" was added by the above anon along with a g3 tag which I reverted. Anyway for this one assuming it's a mistake like mentioned in by the nom, then delete it. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 05:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Serenes Forest → Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The name of a fansite that is irrelevant to the actual game and not mentioned in the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Serenes Forest is incredibly important to many in the community and redirects are WP:CHEAP. Useful navigational tool. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• My argument isn't that it is not important, but that there is nowhere sensible for it to point to. If it cannot be an article, it should be deleted._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:25, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From a quick Google search for Serenes Forest, it seems that it isn't just limited to covering this one game but the Fire Emblem series as a whole. Still not sure it'd be worth keeping as a redirect (to this page or any page related to Fire Emblem) though. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 06:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. If there's no mention of it then it cannot be a "useful navigational tool". —Xezbeth (talk) 07:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree with Zxcvbnm and Xezbeth. Colin M (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Fire EMblem → Fire Emblem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely typo for a game title. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:36, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. ((R from miscapitalization)). –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• This kind of thing would open up a WP:PANDORA's box if it was a valid miscapitalization. Fire EmBlem, Fire EmbLem, etc. R from miscapitalization is, IMO, geared more towards things like "Fire emblem"._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not a particularly likely or unique typo. The main functions of ((R from miscapitalization)) are aiding searches and maintaining links; this redirect fails in both regards as 22 views per year does not imply significant utility and there are no incoming links. ComplexRational (talk) 07:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, harmless ((R from miscapitalization)). There is no evidence that this redirect existing has encouraged the creation of other such redirects, nor why that would be a bad thing if it did. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not a likely or natural capitalization error. ((R from miscapitalisation)) is not a license to keep any old thing. PC78 (talk) 01:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Harmless miscapitalization that results from one of the more common miscapitalization errors (i.e. still holding shift after a properly capitalized results in the second also being capitalized). ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep and refine to the Common elements section. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Magic in the Fire Emblem series → Fire Emblem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Weapons in the Fire Emblem Series → Fire Emblem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Little mention of this in the article. WP:NOTGUIDE style cruft. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Fire Emblem#Gameplay. WP:NOTGUIDE applies to articles; not redirects. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I've WP:BOLDly retargeted the page per the above user's suggestion. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 06:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Fire_Emblem#Common_elements, since while the Gameplay sections contains the bulk of the relevant content, the Setting section above mentions the Fire Emblem, which is a magic weapon. Therefore, it makes sense to redirect to the higher level section. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• C16H16Cl3N5O → PSB-10  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

C16H16Cl3N5O was created by mistake: formula of PSB-10 is C16H14Cl3N5O. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C₁₆H₁₆Cl₃N₅O. I propose to delete it. (C16H14Cl3N5O is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 22:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom. Pichpich (talk) 23:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Center for Brain and Cognition → V. S. Ramachandran  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect has two problems: the first is that it's pointing at the director of the UCSD Center for Brain and Cognition, as opposed to the center itself (article does not exist) or its parent organization (UCSD). The second is that there is at least one other such-titled center of roughly equal prominence, the CBC at UPF Barcelona. I would suggest that as neither of these centers has articles right now, this should be converted to a redlink for lack of a clearly suitable target. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware of the Barcelona center when I created the redirect page. The CBC at UCSD is essentially VS Ramachandran's research group. Neither of the two CBCs seems to be an "official" research center of its university. Neither university article mentions its CBC. I don't see enough news coverage for either to make it notable enough for a standalone article. Perhaps a disambiguation page that mentions both CBCs and includes some hyperlinks would be better than a simple redirect? HouseOfChange (talk) 01:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, if it's really the case that neither center is notable at all and that the UCSD CBC is just Ramachandran's work group, then maybe leaving it as is is the best option. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As for its being Ramachandran's work group, there is a very funny description of a meeting there near the end of the 2009 New Yorker profile of him. I searched en-wiki for the term, and several articles mention the UCSD CBC, including the lead section of VS Ramachandran. So I would support leaving the redirect. HouseOfChange (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Stripe graphic → Warming stripes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Stripe diagram → Warming stripes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too vague, no indication that these refer to climate diagrams. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep:

-- Stripe graphic is now recited in the article and also in:

- https://lifehacker.com/see-how-climate-change-has-affected-your-area-with-warm-1835612836

- https://climaterealitychicago.com/show-your-stripes/

-- warming stripe graphic or "warming stripe" graphic is used in:

- the inventor's tweet: https://twitter.com/ed_hawkins/status/1140622501917147136

- https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-energy-202/2019/06/18/the-energy-202-a-federal-watchdog-is-investigating-trump-administration-s-decisions-on-utah-monument/5d07b4c8a7a0a4586bb2db10/

- https://www.mytwintiers.com/news-cat/local-news/check-out-the-change-in-new-york-and-pennsylvanias-climate-on-show-your-stripes-day/

-- "Stripe diagram" is based on Wikimedia Commons categories Climate change diagrams, Global warming diagrams, etc.

-- The graphic was invented by a climate scientist to visualize specific data (temperatures) for a specific purpose (global warming). The two broader^{not "vague"} terms you list above simply don't yet have a separate and broader Wikipedia article. —RCraig09 (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:SURPRISE._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:43, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – plausible search term, redirects are cheap, and I'm not seeing anything to disambiguate, so I don't see why we wouldn't keep the redirect. – Levivich 15:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 2019 J.League Cup / Copa Sudamericana Championship Final → 2019 J.League Cup / Copa Sudamericana Championship  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not really something that wouldn't be looked at. HawkAussie (talk) 00:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. As of this point, this redirect has some article-namespace links that would be broken if this redirect was deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 02:11, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. @Steel1943: Should be all fixed by now. Chanheigeorge (talk) 18:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as possible search term. GiantSnowman 10:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Upper Village → Forest Hill, Toronto  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous term, based on internet search results the most well-known "Upper Village" is in Whistler, BC, but it's also a moniker used in several other locations. I would suggest deletion and letting the search engine do its work due to the lack of a clear primary target. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps create a disambiguation page? Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 01:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I considered that, but it is further complicated by the fact that "Upper Village" is often merely a subtopic of an actual article--we don't have much in the way of full articles on these subjects (and at least a few seem to be missing entirely). My advocating for deletion is more on the principle of not surprising people looking for one of these places by dropping them in an article that is only marginally even about the other ones. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Way too generic a name. I agree that it's not a good candidate for disambiguation, having done some searching to see if we could support it. --BDD (talk) 17:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Cosmogenic → Environmental radioactivity#Natural  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Would cosmogenic nuclide be a more appropriate target? The current redirect is to a section with a hatnote pointing to that article, and I am not aware of another possible primary topic for the term cosmogenic (at least in this broad context). ComplexRational (talk) 18:05, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as overly vague. The search engine results when a person types in "cosmogenic" would be more helpful._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to cosmogenic nuclide. It is a fairly complete article on the topic and it is hard to see cosmogenic wanting to be anywhere else. Although we could probably manage without it, there isn't really any strong reason to delete the redirect; it doesn't meet any of the main reasons to delete. Lithopsian (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to cosmogenic nuclide. That's what I did some eons ago, and I still think this to be the best solution. --Pjacobi (talk) 11:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Любе → Lyube  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The Cyrillic in the redirect is a misspelling of the subject's name in Russian, which is Любэ. I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Implausible typo. James-the-Charizard (talk) 04:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above - typo. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. People who speak Russian likely won't make this typo, and people who don't speak Russian will likely come here via copy/paste. Even if they come here by entering the letters individually, they'll probably use something like Character Map or a list of Russian letters, and they'll copy letters one-by-one, and if they're taking the effort to do that, they'll notice if they make a mistake, since е and э are quite different, unlike э and з, or ш and щ. Either way, it's highly unlikely that anglophones will make this mistake. Nyttend (talk) 02:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• C34H52N4O4 → Protoporphyrinogen IX  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

C34H52N4O4 was created by mistake: formula of Protoporphyrinogen IX is C34H38N4O4. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C₃₄H₅₂N₄O₄. I propose to delete it. (C34H38N4O4 is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 22:27, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Pichpich (talk) 23:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete by IP address 2405:9800:BA30:C21A:B401:FE10:B77F:3D57 (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 14:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• A room full of monkeys → Infinite monkey theorem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:THE. The phrase is not mentioned in the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, this is a plausible generalization of the theorem, and I don't see competing usage. WP:THE is for article titles, not redirects. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A quick google search shows that the phrase "a room full of monkeys" is commonly used to refer to the setup of the infinite monkey theorem. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh Great → Oh! great  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:SURPRISE. The exclamation point in the redirected title makes it somewhat different than this generic phrase. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep as a plausible and seemingly unambiguous misspelling. Might be surprising, but doesn't impede navigation or cause harm in any other way that I know of. Geolodus (talk) 08:16, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as plausible. If I hear someone named this, I would think it's formatted "Oh Great" instead of "Oh! great". -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tavix. The exclamation point in the redirected title makes it quite implausible: there's no way we'd use an exclamation point like this if it weren't part of a name, and we shouldn't expect readers to know that it's there. Nyttend (talk) 02:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Mad (Tv Series) → Mad (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RDAB. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:RDAB doesn't apply here, but there are two capitalization errors in the disambiguator, which makes this an unlikely typo. - Eureka Lott 17:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Smells Like Teen Spirit\ → Smells Like Teen Spirit  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:UNNATURAL. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, unnatural typing error. PC78 (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Cat Daddy games → 2K (company)#Studios  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No such list on the target page. The primary page this originally redirected to, Cat Daddy Games, has also been redirected. Lordtobi (✉) 19:30, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Kid ICarus → Kid Icarus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:PANDORA. Unnecessary as Wikipedia search already corrects such errors. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:COSTLY, thanks to search capabilities, this redirect is useless. James-the-Charizard (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an unlikely typo. There are around 15 views per year, which isn't enough to suggest that it has greater utility than catching 15 random mistakes that everyone makes now and then. ComplexRational (talk) 20:04, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete≈ while I don’t think this 12 year old redirect had opened any form of Pandora’s Box it is highly unlikely.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 18:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Harmless ((R from miscapitalization)). No one has provided evidence that this redirect has opened a "Pandora's box" in its 12 year existence, nor how that would be a bad thing if that did occur. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't think Pandora's Box was opened either, but this is completely unnecessary, Wikipedia search capabilities render it useless. James-the-Charizard (talk) 21:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an unnatural capitalization error. PC78 (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Eurovision Song Contest Asia 2018 → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Inaugural contest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• ESCA 2019 → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Inaugural contest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The name of the show is "Eurovision Asia Song Contest" with the colloquial initilism "EASC". The contest has never been officially titled "Eurovision Song Contest Asia" nor has the initialism "ESCA" ben used. Both are unlikely search terms, especially in combination with years the contest will not take place in. Lordtobi (✉) 18:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Azerbaijan in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Participation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Hong Kong in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Participation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• India in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Participation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Indonesia in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Participation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Singapore in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Participation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Turkey in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Participation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• United Arab Emirates in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Participation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Vietnam in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Participation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

None of these countries have announced their intent to participate in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest, so any such redirect is misleading. Lordtobi (✉) 18:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Solomon Islands in the Eurovision Song Contest → Eurovision Asia Song Contest#Participation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The Solomon Islands do not (and can not) participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. The country intends to take part in the spin-off show Eurovision Asia Song Contest (which has yet to happen), but a separate redirect for that exists, making this redirect wrong and misleading. Lordtobi (✉) 18:48, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The, Or the Critical Journal Edinburgh Review → Edinburgh Review  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nonsense redirect and apparently a typo for The Edinburgh Review, or The Critical Journal. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The redirects to the main article from The Edinburgh Review and the newly create one from The Critical Journal are intelligible but this one is so mangled as to be unlikely to ever be of use. AllyD (talk) 20:07, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. We need to support actual alternate titles, but this is far from reality...how did it even get created? Nyttend (talk) 02:17, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7. I created this redirect in error. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• C12H16FNO4S → Polmacoxib  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

C12H16FNO4S was created by mistake: formula of Polmacoxib is C18H16FNO4S. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C₁₂H₁₆FNO₄S. I propose to delete it. (C18H16FNO4S is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 10:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Anicotti → Animal Crossing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Woolio → Animal Crossing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Roald (Animal Crossing) → Animal Crossing#Characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A stock standard "normal villager" character who isn't even a major character of the game. Not mentioned in the target page, overly crufty. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 05:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all as game cruft without mentions in the target article. Quick Internet searches show no descriptions of these characters besides in fan wikis/forums, making it (at least seemingly) impossible to add any properly sourced mentions. Geolodus (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete These are just three villager characters among hundreds in the series. If we had a list of Animal Crossing characters, they wouldn't be in the list. Other characters have roles in gameplay or plot, but these villagers do not. Reach Out to the Truth 01:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, none of these mentioned in article. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 21:06, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• K.K.'s Hidden Songs → Animal Crossing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Veers into pure WP:GAMEGUIDE territory. Not mentioned in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 05:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Animal Crossing Revolution → Animal Crossing: City Folk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nobody refers to the Wii as "Revolution" anymore, especially when searching for a specific game. Implausible. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Animal Crossing Wii (working title) → Animal Crossing: City Folk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The disambiguation doesn't make much sense anymore as it has had a real title for a decade. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as harmless, unambiguous, and a clear ((R avoided double redirect)) for Animal Crossing Wii. Steel1943 (talk) 00:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The redirect is completely malformed. (working title) is not a disambiguation, it's a description. For such blatant errors in disambiguation, they shouldn't remain clogging things up._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • ...But it's not "malformed". For one, ((R from working title)) exists (though it a redirect itself), and also, doing a search in Wikipedia for the phrase "working title" returns a good amount of redirects ending with "(working title)", meaning it's quite an accepted disambiguation phrase used quite often. Steel1943 (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Okay, I guess you are right in that it could be a disambiguation. However... there is no proof that it was an actual, official working title and not a fan created nickname._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 06:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is one of those that I would put in the "probably only makes sense temporarily" category. Now that there is an official name for the game, it doesn't make sense to keep a redirect that is disambiguated this way, and I can't imagine this being searched. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Tavix. --BDD (talk) 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Let's go to the city → Animal Crossing: City Folk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as overly vague phrase to refer to this one target. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as vague and potentially confusing. This would not make a good title for a disambiguation page either. Geolodus (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom & Geo. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:41, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Animal Cross:Wild World → Animal Crossing: Wild World  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:UNNATURAL, the double typo renders it overly implausible. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.