The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete (R3). -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 23:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Indri Animal → Indri  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Remainder of an ill-conceived page move. We have Indri (with a hatnote to the disambiguation) and Indri (disambiguation); I don't think this constitutes a likely search term. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Alcatraz success escape attempt → June 1962 Alcatraz escape attempt  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not only is the redirect title ungrammatical and therefore unlikely, it does not appear accurate to call this a "success [sic] escape attempt", as there is no proof that it was successful. I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete as implausible. Geolodus (talk) 18:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom. StonyBrook (talk) 19:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Dual (2017 TV series) → Duel (South Korean TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. A user (a non-Korean speaker I believe) thought the title of the K-drama reads—or means—"dual", oblivious to the fact that the production company uses the English title Duel (please see the target article). I think people would more likely search "Duel" than "Dual". Thank you. Angga (formerly Angga1061) 09:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Can the Korean 듀얼 be translated either way? PC78 (talk) 11:53, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I think I found out just now that the user—and thus, this source that is used for the article on one of the drama's leading actors—read the Hangeul title somewhat correctly. As Koreans would pronounce foreign words almost exactly the same way as they are originally pronounced, "듀얼" reads "dual", but it can also read "duel" as the drama's production company suggests (since "dual" and "duel" are pronounced exactly the same). To be honest, I'm not a native Korean speaker myself, so please understand.—Angga (formerly Angga1061) 17:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep, a plausible ((R from typo)). Misspelling "Duel" as "Dual" is not that unlikely. Not a very active user (talk) 16:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep as both a plausible typo and a plausible homophone error. Thryduulf (talk) 13:48, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Wikiped → Wikipedia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Forgetting a letter is quite common, but forgetting 2 letters is highly unlikely. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 13:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep Delete. [Edit, per below comments] The redirect averages eight hits a day, and recently had over 50 hits (maybe a misspelling in a news or social article?). So quite a few readers are using it, and it's possible it may become further used as a shortcut on social media. Nothing is hurt by keeping it, and eight readers a day will learn how to spell the name. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete It is likely that many of those hits are caused by it hijacking autocomplete. Wikipedia is the top search result when you've only typed wikipe, but as soon as you type the d, wikiped takes over that spot. I know I've clicked the wrong autocomplete suggestion in other similar situations. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 19:36, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete I'm not convinced that this redirect helps confused readers, for the word "Wikipedia" occurs several times on every article-space page (most visibly under the logo). Anyone who gets that far will either finish typing or have it auto-completed correctly; I'm pretty sure it only receives the hits it does because of autocomplete. As there's no useful function, and keeping it technically makes the correct search harder, I would recommend deletion. ComplexRational (talk) 21:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per compelling arguments by nom, Ahecht, and ComplexRational, especially: "keeping it technically makes the correct search harder". -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 23:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment. Apparently "Wikiped" is a verb in pop culture, meaning to search something on Wikipedia. But then again, Urban Dictionary isn't a reliable source, and I'm not even sure how often the term "wikiped" is used. Besides that, I have no other comment for the result of this RfC. Utopes (talk) 04:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Fahrenheit (season 1) → Heroes (season 1)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Fahrenheit (season 2) → Heroes (season 2)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Fahrenheit (season 3) → Heroes (season 3)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No idea what this is supposed to be redirected to. Can't find any mention of this anywhere. Gonnym (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. Can't fathom these at all, there's no indication that this is an alternative name for the series. The user who created them is blocked so we might never know. PC78 (talk) 13:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete. I can't see a connection either. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment: Fahrenheit (TV series) is a redirect targeting Heroes (American TV series), the aforementioned redirect also being created by the creator of these nominated redirects. Steel1943 (talk) 05:53, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 31#Fahrenheit (TV series). This user appears to have created many dubious redirects related to the Heroes TV series. PC78 (talk) 11:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Xishan National Forest Park → Xihui Park  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Xishan National Forest Park is different to Xihui Park. Xishan National Forest Park is in Beijing and Xihui Park is in Wuxi. SCP-2000 (talk) 10:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• LOL(laughing out loud) → LOL (Laughing Out Loud)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Disambiguator for this film is both mis-spaced and mis-capitalized. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep. No valid reason for deletion specified. Ruslik_Zero 11:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom and WP:RDAB. Malformed redirect, which is a perfectly valid reason. PC78 (talk) 13:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete as an unlikely, malformed title that contains 4 errors and treats "laughing out loud" as the expanded form of "LOL" instead of treating "LOL (Laughing Out Loud)" as the work's complete title. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 15:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete- malformed redirect. It really isn't a plausible search term. Reyk _YO! 15:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• OFAHE → List of Only Fools and Horses episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• LOFAHE → List of Only Fools and Horses episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• LOOFAHE → List of Only Fools and Horses episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, Similar to the logic in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 August 30#LOHGBF, no one is going to search for a Wikipedia list by its acronym. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep, I disagree with above user. I often search by acronym as it speeds searching up. It makes it easier to find what i'm looking for. Makro (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete all. All three redirects are made-up abbreviations of the list's title. Invented shortcuts for editors' benefit can be appropriate outside of content namespaces or in a pseudo-namespace, where they can be shared with other editors at the destination page via ((Shortcut)), but not in regular article space. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 17:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete all. Made-up acronyms that only mean something to the user who created them. Google search for OFAHE finds nothing related to the series other than this redirect. PC78 (talk) 11:02, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete all per nom. The redirects are not official alternative names or acronyms for their target subjects. Steel1943 (talk) 19:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Wikipedia:Bookmarklet → Wikipedia:Tools  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Not listed as one of the tools on the target page. No inbound links. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. It was not listed even at the time of the redirect's creation. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 16:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.