The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Sources provided justifying the redirect's use, withdrawing nomination. (non-admin closure) _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Eduardo Santos Rodrigues → Eduardo de Deus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This appears to be a misnomer; the subject's full name is Eduardo Rodrigues dos Santos de Deus Junior, and I wasn't able to find any evidence online that "Santos" (without dos or de Deus) has ever been used to refer to this person. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:44, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it is not a misnomer : the full name is sourced by CBAt, the Brazilian Athletics Confederation (and in several official lists, as this one). As in most usual norms in naming, only the father’s name, de Deus, is considered in a short Portuguese name.-Arorae (talk) 02:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 21:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:SELFPUB → Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget – WP:SELFPUB goes to "Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves" (same as WP:ABOUTSELF), but I feel it should obviously go to the section "Self-published sources" (same as WP:SELFPUBLISH). Almost all of the incoming links are discussions about a source being self-published, not about information people have published about themselves on social media. As can be seen in the edit history, people went back and forth about this shortcut in 2009. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:08, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Wiipedis → Wikipedia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Extremely unlikely for both "Wiki" and "pedia" to be seriously misspelled like this. — Searingjet // talk // contribs 14:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Doesn't look remotely plausible to me as a misspelling. Basically just nonsense. PC78 (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I can find exactly one other use of this string of text produced by a human, and that's in a post on a Last.fm user profile written in what Google Translate tells me is Indonesian but which it can't decipher most of (I suspect it's in highly abbreviated text message speak or similar). Thryduulf (talk) 19:55, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep with Wikipedia being one of our most viewed articles, typos are very likely. 2 typos in one word is unlikely, but still plausible. Willbb234^Talk (please ((ping)) me in replies) 22:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment According to this tool its the most viewed page as of time of writing. Willbb234^Talk (please ((ping)) me in replies) 22:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. One of the many nonsensical (and deleted) redirects, categories and other useless stuff created by a disruptive, and now blocked, editor. Implausible typo, and even if a user types something like this, they can certainly type it again, and correctly.—J. M. (talk) 16:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Queen's College. Deryck C. 11:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Queens College High School → Saint Michael, Barbados#Education  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. There is no indication in the article of a school with this name. This term with an apostrophe is ambiguous with many others (see Queen's College#Schools), and without an apostrophe is probably an error (unless there's one in Queens NY). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Queen's College where there are a bunch of secondary schools listed. Here's one that refers to the Bahamas high school. [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and User:Shhhnotsoloud. -DM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmehus (talk • contribs) 16:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Queen's College per AngusWOOF. --BDD (talk) 18:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per AngusWOOF. It's very clearly a useful search term for several entries on that list. Thryduulf (talk) 19:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Darhyl Camper Jr. → Fire (Big Sean song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This producer/songwriter probably deserves an article, having worked with a number of famous artists, has his own category for songwriting. However, he does not deserve a redirect to just one song of the many that are listed at WP. If anybody can find RS for an article, please (I tried and failed). Richhoncho (talk) 11:42, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Anthony D. Holmes (Medcial) → Anthony D. Holmes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect-- the (Medcial) bit is both useless and misspelled-- left after a page move. Nothing links here except bot wonk. Reyk _YO! 09:42, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The article was at this title for exactly three minutes before it was corrected by the author, there is no value in keeping it. PC78 (talk) 10:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete misspelled disambiguation are rarely helpful. Wug·a·po·des​ 01:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BDD, I deleted Module:Video game series reviews 2/doc which was tagged (by mistake? it was created by the nomination, it seems...) but not listed here - Nabla (talk) 00:19, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Module:Video game series reviews 2 → Module:Video game series reviews  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Template:Video game series reviews 2 → Template:Video game series reviews  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Template:Video game series reviews 2/doc → Template:Video game series reviews/doc  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Sticking a "2" onto the end of a pre-existing title does not create a plausible redirect. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. This page has only one author, user:Alpha Beta Sigma, who created it as a module and then redirected it to the existing one on 5 July 2015. It's probably no longer required, and they haven't edited since 2015, but I've left them a note on their talk page to make sure they have the opportunity to comment here should they wish. This discussion should not be closed early. Thryduulf (talk) 09:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not a plausible redirect and the underlying content has been abandoned and unused for several years now. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Added Template:Video game series reviews 2. Courtesy ping to Thryduulf and Tavix. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Pppery and Tavix: And I've added the /doc subpage too. Thryduulf (talk) 22:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The template /doc page history makes it clear the purpose was as "Extended version of ((Video game series reviews)), support sales and Famitsu score cols. Mainly use for Japanese series that are not regular released in western.". The template history makes it clear that this functionality was merged into the main template. Unless we need to keep the pre-merge development versions around for attribution purposes (I don't think we do?), then I stand by my original recommendation to delete this but not speedily. Thryduulf (talk) 22:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.