April 7

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 7, 2020.

Scandal (fragrance)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 15#Scandal (fragrance)

CutiePie

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 15#CutiePie

Planck wavenumber

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 07:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirects. "Wavenumber" and "specific volume" are not mentioned at Planck units, and "orders of magnitude" are not mentioned at Specific volume or Wavenumber. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Viram Deo

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 15#Viram Deo

Registered Charity No. 278687

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep , my bad signed, Rosguill talk 23:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. Searching for this term online led me to the UK Charity Commission, but when I searched for 27867 I got no results. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 21:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Original Planck derived units

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♠ 03:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, no results on Google Scholar, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 21:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Newton per metre

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to SI derived unit#Examples of derived quantities and units. King of ♠ 03:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Newtons per metre are also used for the measurement of a variety of other concepts in materials science. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Main page

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 07:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this move discussion, someone suggested that this should redirect to Home page. I would like to seek consensus about whether this should happen. Interstellarity (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alta Vista Homeowners Association, Sonoma County, California

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♠ 03:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 20:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, SONIC678 20:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WikiProject Inca Empire

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 07:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created CNR to a newly formed, essentially inactive Wikiproject. This does not come up to the standards required for a CNR. Hog Farm (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Plantilla:Citar web

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♠ 19:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we need a redirect on the English Wikipedia with the namespace prefix in Spanish? Delete per WP:RFFL. Hog Farm (talk) 17:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the Spanish Wikipedia, the prefix Template redirects to prefix Plantilla, but on the English wikipedia, it doesn't redirect and the search also doesn't display the correct result. Same with Modèle:Lien web. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 17:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I of M

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy thanks. (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can somebody provide a source that this abbreviation is used? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cuna de lobos (upcoming TV series)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 15#Cuna de lobos (upcoming TV series)

First person quiz

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♠ 19:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to have been an article that existed for 11 minutes in 2014 before being redirected. "First person quiz" isn't mentioned on Tom Scott's article. If someone came across this redirect randomly, I think it wouldn't be clear why it redirects to Tom Scott's article at all. – numbermaniac 14:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sonic 1 beta

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♠ 19:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure of the purpose of this redirect. I don't see the word "beta" mentioned anywhere on the target article. With a total of 91 page views in nearly 5 years, compared to 1.08 million for the target article in the same time period, this redirect doesn't really seem to be useful to anyone. – numbermaniac 14:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Crate an article

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete. Per criteria G6. Michael Greiner 00:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because not useful and creation seems accidental. Either that or redirect to Help:Your first article ~ Tridwoxi (talk) (contribs) 12:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

褚姓

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Chu (Chinese surname)#褚 Chǔ. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect to a DAB page with no clear match. 褚 is a form of Chu (Chinese surname) (but not of Zhu (surname)) and 姓 of Zhu (surname) (but not of Chu (surname)). Few Chinese surnames have more than a single character. Delete as confusing. Narky Blert (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.