The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) pandakekok9 (talk) Junk the Philippine anti-terror law! 10:49, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Assmar → Asthma  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An unlikely misspelling of the target, Assmar is also both a given name and a surname. I would thus suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Not a misspelling per se. This form is used by a (child) character in Lord of the Flies. But there are only three uses on Wikipedia, and Eduardo Assmar at List of senators in Brazil is the only one I'd say definitely meets WP:DABMENTION. Francisco de Melo is listed as a Count of Assmar, though his own article gives him as Count of Assumar. I don't know if the former is a misspelling or a valid alternate form. D&D has an Aasimar race. I'm leaning delete—these scraps don't add up to a disambiguation page. --BDD (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Doesn't seem to be enough for a surname page or a dab page. The Lord of the Flies mention gets some google hits, but mostly on urban dictionary and the like. Hog Farm (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep or DAB. I surprise myself but saying it, but "assmar" does seem like a plausible phonetic transcription of "asthma" such as might be made by someone who doesn't know the spelling. I come across a surprising amount of people who don't know the spelling for the names of medical conditions and so resort to crude transcriptions or "egg corn" interpretations, such as Alzheimers as "old-timers" or Asperger's as "assburgers", even independently from different people on social media. Given this, it does not seem implausible that someone might type "assmar" into a search bar if they did not know the correct spelling. Given this, as redirects are cheap, it might as well remain unless there's an actual topic that warrants its own page, such as one of the names mentioned above if they are notable. BlackholeWA (talk) 03:20, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• We need the redirect to stay now. This is a title in LOTF. We need it so someone thinking of LOTF doesn't get confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernspeed (talk • contribs) 20:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate Definitely not a strong retarget for asthma... at best, disambiguate with asthma maybe being one of the options. --Micky (talk) 23:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Jules César → Julius Caesar (play)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect has a smell of WP:RFFL. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. fr:Jules César is equivalent to Julius Caesar the man, not the Shakespeare play fr:Jules César (Shakespeare) / Julius Caesar (play). WP:RLOTE, ambiguous, bad target, you name it. Narky Blert (talk) 19:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. If it survives WP:RFFL then it should redirect to Julius Caesar as the name format is not specific to this play. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:14, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate I've drafted one below the redirect. I think it's fine as is, though see also fr:Jules César (homonymie), which has several other topics that could be referred to as Jules César in English. --BDD (talk) 23:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:FORRED. Nothing particularly French in any of the targets. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate I like the disambiguation draft made by BDD. --Micky (talk) 00:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• BDD's dab draft is a better solution. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 12:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate per BDD. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Sannata (2013 film) → Sannata  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a something of a puzzle. Sannata is a 1981 film, and there's no sign of a remake. Sannata (TV series) aired in 2014, and wasn't a film. IMDb lists no 2013 film. Saba Qamar and Sajal Aly link to Sannata (2013 film); but neither has an IMDb entry. Delete, before my head explodes. Narky Blert (talk) 19:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• This is an R with history. The original stub was clearly about the TV series, which appears to have begun in 2013. Retarget to Sannata (TV series) or delete as misnamed. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No film with this title was released in 2013, and I personally don't see any significant page history as stated above; original stub was created in 2017 by a user who was blocked indefinitely. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Vashikaran → Incantation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention in article 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 18:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. FWIW, Lumbar support is almost certainly a notable subject in its own right. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Lumbar support → Lumbar  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention in article 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This could refer to two things: a kind of back belt, or an office chair accessory. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was converted to article. (non-admin closure) Pandakekok9 (talk) 08:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Next Thai general election → 2019 Thai general election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Next Thai legislative election → 2019 Thai general election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The 2019 election has taken place, and discussion of the next election would be WP:CRYSTAL at this point, so there isn't an appropriate target. Paul_012 (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I've converted Next Thai general election into an article and retargeted the other one there. There is already some opinion polling data, and next election articles are not generally considered WP:CRYSTAL violations. Number 57 19:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Faqash → Darod  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nothing in the target article discusses this term. I looked at the target article at the time this redirect was created, Faqash was not mentioned in that version either. I do not see any reason for this redirect. ~ GB fan 17:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per WP:G10 as an attack page. This article and this Reddit post explain the term, based on them the context of this redirect seems to be an vulgar insult to the target. I can find only two other uses of the term on Wikipedia - both in comments left in 2016 that were interpreted as personal attacks (one at SPI, one on a user talk page) so we have nowhere to retarget it and there is no entry at Wiktionary either. While a dictionary definition would certainly be possible, encyclopaedic content would be harder and might need to be in a section of the article about Siad Barre or his regime, and given the usage of the term both would be best written by someone who is familiar with both the term and the topic area. So all that said I think speedy deletion as an attack page is best until we get content. Thryduulf (talk) 17:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:G10 per Thryduulf. The top two hits in a Google search (non-WP:RS) were 1 (Urban Dictionary) and (2) 2 (Reddit), and they leave me in no doubt that the word is an ethnic slur. Narky Blert (talk) 18:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Saffa → South Africa  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

According to an IP, it is a colloquial word to mean South African people. However, it is nowhere mentioned on the article, even on the Demographics of South Africa. I suggest deletion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 15:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambig. Wiktionary wikt:Saffa has it as an alternative of "Saffer" meaning an inhabitant of South Africa, but our Saffer article is about a Germanic surname and I can't find mention of either on Wikipeida. However there are three other plausible meanings of Saffer: a Swiss exhibition, a Palestinian town and a Maldivian volleyball player. The first two are about equally prominent in search results so I've drafted a disambiguation page below the redirect, including a link to Wiktionary. It could probably do with cleaning up though. Thryduulf (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If this is disambiguated, a link to it should be added as a see also at Safa (disambiguation). Thryduulf (talk) 17:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate. "Saffers" is a colloquial name in UK (and possibly elsewhere) for South Africa national cricket team and South Africa national rugby union team at least. "Safa", "saffa" and "saffer" are phonetically identical; note that Saffer is a surname list page, and that DAB page Safa exists, which makes formulation of a new useful DAB page moderately tricky. Narky Blert (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:ONESENTENCEISNOTABLE → Wikipedia:Trivial mentions#Alternative view 2: Single sentences are not inherently insignificant coverage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Wikipedia:SINGLESENTENCEISNOTABLE → Wikipedia:Trivial mentions#Alternative view 2: Single sentences are not inherently insignificant coverage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Wikipedia:SINGLESENTENCENOTABLE → Wikipedia:Trivial mentions#Alternative view 2: Single sentences are not inherently insignificant coverage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Wikipedia:SINGLESENTENCESIGNIFICANT → Wikipedia:Trivial mentions#Alternative view 2: Single sentences are not inherently insignificant coverage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Wikipedia:SINGLESENTENCEISSIGNIFICANT → Wikipedia:Trivial mentions#Alternative view 2: Single sentences are not inherently insignificant coverage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Section does not exist any more. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 11#WP:ONESENTENCENOTABLE 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Delete per the consensus in the previous discussion (which was about related redirects). Thryduulf (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Thryduulf. OcelotCreeper (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete section doesn't exist. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• EJD → The Dome at America's Center  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

EJD is not mentioned anywhere on the target, it might refer to a former name "Edward Jones Dome", but that doesn't appear in google search results that I've seen so it's a guess. The prominent google hits are for European Joint Doctorate, European Junior Doctors Association and European Journal of Dermatology all of which might be notable but don't have articles along with a secondhand car dealership in Sheffield that is almost certainly not notable. On Wikipedia Ernst-Jürgen Dreyer, Elias Judah Durand and Edward John Drake appear in search results but may or may not be notably known by their initials? I'm not sure what is best here? Thryduulf (talk) 13:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and let Search function uninhibited, since there is no clear target or scope for disambiguation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't find anything appropriate for a target, either. Without a clear statement in those biographical articles that the individual was known as "EJD", I'd be reluctant to point it to any of them.—Ketil Trout (^<><!) 15:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Syllable#Components. per Thryduulf. (non-admin closure) Pandakekok9 (talk) 11:57, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Syllable structure → Syllable#Structure  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The "Structure" section does not exist in the article. I suggest deletion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 08:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Syllable. 18 articles already link to the redirect and more likely will. Syllable discusses syllable structure, so Syllable structure should redirect there. No-brainer. Nardog (talk) 09:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also fine with rerefining as suggested below. Nardog (talk) 16:22, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Unrefine to Syllable] per Nardog or Update to Syllable#Components, what the "Structure" section was renamed to in 2015 [1]. Thryduulf (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Rerefine to (the renamed) Syllable#Components (1^st choice), which discusses the structure of syllables in languages, or unrefine (2^nd choice), as the other sections also discuss it to some degree. Regards, SONIC678 02:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 3 Originals → Rick Astley  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

We don't mention the target anymore, I redirected all Rick Astley compilation albums to it's discography page, I shall suggest delete for the redirect target. Universal Music in Netherlands has their releases of 3 Originals in Dutch market in late 90s. 2600:6C4E:580:A:D46F:987F:F800:B84C (talk) 07:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• C Stock → London Underground C69 and C77 Stock  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• D Stock → London Underground D78 Stock  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The first redirect was a disambiguation page. There are 2 articles that used to be listed : London Underground C69 and C77 Stock and London Underground C Stock. The page was redirected to London Underground C69 and C77 Stock (for a second time) with edit summary "Most users will be looking for the more recent type of rolling stock, secondly, consisent with the D Stock article, which redirects to London Underground D78 Stock". That may be true, but appears to be inconsistent with current article titles. My opinion, repeated from the first time I reverted the change from a disambiguation page to a redirect, is that it doesn't seem reasonable to redirect this title to the one of the two entries that doesn't have "C stock" in the title. The second redirect under discussion is a similar situation. Perhaps some article renaming, and certainly hatnotes, would help? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep These redirects should be kept because 1) most readers will be interested in the more recent type of subsurface rolling stock and 2) two articles is really not enough to make a disambiguation page, as MRSC stated: [2]. It also keeps it consistent with S Stock, which redirects to London Underground S7 and S8 Stock. C2A06 (About • Talk • Edits) 08:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "C stock" and "D stock" were and indeed still are the common names for these trains as noted in the very first sentence of both articles. Trains used 1970-2014 (C69/77) and 1980-2017 (D78) to transport millions of people every day are much more likely to be searched than the trains in service 1910-1959 (C) or 1912-1958 (D), especially since the two latter were reclassified as H stock in the 1940s and confined to light branch-line duties after the early 1950s. Thryduulf (talk) 12:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @C2A06: @Thryduulf: I accept that that's the case, but at the moment London Underground C Stock and C Stock lead to different places which is confusing. Should there therefore be some article renaming: perhaps "London Underground C Stock (1912–1958)" etc? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I certainly wouldn't object to that proposal, but it belongs at RM not here. Thryduulf (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • See Talk:London Underground C Stock#Requested move 30 June 2020. C2A06 (About • Talk • Edits) 08:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Reinstate as disambiguation page, should be returned to being disambiguation page rather than only pointing to one article as was the case for 13 years until recently changed. Neither is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Same should also apply to D Stock, S Stock and any other LU rollingstock where a classification has been recycled. Lochinaness (talk) 02:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree with reinstating as disambiguation pages. C69/77 Stock, D78 Stock and S7/S8 Stock (the more modern types of rolling stock) are the primary topic since they are most likely to be searched compared to the original District/Metropolitan railway rolling stock.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Konzlager → Nazi concentration camps  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Non-standard, unusual German abbreviation of Konzentrationslager. Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. buidhe 05:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:RFFL. It's a known abbreviation, see de:Konzlager, and the connection to German is obvious. Narky Blert (talk) 07:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per de:Konzlager Geo Swan (talk) 14:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as useful. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. In addition to the arguments raised below, it's worth noting that Scholar results show cases of this word being used to describe refugee camps, in addition to Nazi camps. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Übergangslager → Nazi concentration camps#Types of camps  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

IDK exactly what this means, but it's certainly not discussed in the target article. buidhe 04:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. German WP has no article or redirect. This looks to me like a misnomer for de:Konzentrationslager#Durchgangslager, a type of transit camp. Narky Blert (talk) 07:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's a synonym more than a misnomer, but yeah, "transit camp", is a reasonable translation. That said, being a non-English word, without the word being discussed in the article, it's not a helpful redirect.—Ketil Trout (^<><!) 16:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Transit camp. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:05, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Transitcamp → Nazi concentration camps  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely formulation, not mentioned at target. buidhe 04:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to transit camp as a misnomer or typo; fairly easy to miss the space bar or think this is meant to be a one word phrase. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 04:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The page history shows an attempted RfD nomination; through some gnoming I've tracked it down to this reasoning. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 05:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to DAB page transit camp tagged as ((R from ambiguous term)). Narky Blert (talk) 07:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per above. Thryduulf (talk) 12:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Mallu Arjun → Allu Arjun  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm confused as to what this redirect is referring to. I don't know of any sources that use this alternate name for this person. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the nominator obviously didn't actually look for sources as I found Allu Arjun enjoys being called 'Mallu Arjun', They call me 'Mallu' Arjun: Allu Arjun and I love being called `Mallu Arjun’, says the Stylish Star in less than a minute. Thryduulf (talk) 12:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.