The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Sebastianus (Roman general) → Sebastianus (magister peditum)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Sebastianus (4th century Roman general) → Sebastianus (magister peditum)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Sebastianus (4th-century Roman general) → Sebastianus (magister peditum)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete all. "General" is anachronistic and vague in the subject's context, and its use is discouraged by WP:ROMANS. The redirect links aren't used anywhere important, so a deletion will result in no disruptions. Avis11 (talk) 21:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Seems uncontroversial.★Trekker (talk) 18:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:POINT. Thryduulf (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• List of people who have seen Titanic → Titanic_(1997_film)#Commercial_analysis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete: Ridiculous WP:POINTy redirect made in response to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have learned Transcendental Meditation. Obviously not a likely search term, not linked from any article, not really related to the target Reywas92^Talk

• Delete per nom as with previous lists of people who have done the Ice Bucket Challenge. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as WP:POINTy at best, and borderline vandalism at worst; see this diff for some context of what this was in response to. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Utterly pointless, and it's creation was borderline disruptive editing. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete- created just to spite someone at AfD. "Do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point". Reyk _YO! 08:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Bharatiya jinnah party → Bharatiya Janata Party  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Bhartiya jinnah party → Bharatiya Janata Party  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No evidence that this term is used for the target (Bharatiya Janata Party) by reliable sources; seems to be an epithet created by a rival party. Given the history of antagonism toward Muhammad Ali Jinnah from the BJP, likely meant as a pejorative. Not discussed anywhere in the target article. Unlikely search term. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment added Bhartiya jinnah party, which was created by the same user at the same time. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 03:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy per WP:ATTACK. They are created solely to attack BJP. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• N Delete : as per nom & WP:ATP -- Manasbose ^{(talk | contribs)} 08:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Crownvirus → Coronavirus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Crown virus → Coronavirus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect. "Crown virus" could also be a mispelling of Clown Virus, so this is an ambiguous mispelling. We do not have the redirect Crownvirus disease 2019, so these are the only mentions of "crownvirus" in enwiki. Also, this redirect was created 2 months ago. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 15:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. I created them. Corona means Crown in several languages, which is commonly known even among English natives (as far as I know). Hkbusfan (talk) 23:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Support what? Keep or delete? (or something else?). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  It looks like "keep". --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Implausible variant. Give people a little credit. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Little used redirects. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This may be a bit of a stretch, but I believe that this could be a misnomer from those whose first language is Italian or Spanish (or others). They are likely to find out that en.wp has good content surrounding the virus (wikt:coronavirus#Italian), and translate coronavirus into the 'English' equivalent (crownvirus).
  And, actually, this is a much better argument: that it seems to be a rare variant of the word (wikt:crown virus). — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 01:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft redirect to wiktionary (wikt:crown virus), which seems to be a more plausible target than the current one. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since the Wiktionary definition is "coronavirus", for which Wikipedia has an article, What's the point making it a cross-project soft redirect rather than redirecting to the Wikipedia article? --Paul_012 (talk) 19:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Retarget both to Coronavirus#Etymology, where there is an explanation of what the term "Coronavirus" literally means, this is actually the same article but a different section. I initially thought that this definition was only found at Wiktionary, but indeed I was wrong. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: an implausible redirect. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Mostly peaceful protest → Riot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Peaceful protest redirects to Nonviolent resistance. Thryduulf (talk) 18:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as there isn't any article right now to deal with the "fiery but mostly peaceful" comment that turned into a meme. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – seems like a confusing redirect – why redirect this to Riot as opposed to Nonviolent resistance or just Protest? "Mostly peaceful protest" isn't a term of art, it's just a descriptive phrase. —Granger (talk · contribs) 06:51, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Mike Strange (audio engineer) → Eminem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, might be notable enough for an independent article. Delete, both to encourage article creation and due to the lack of anything useful at the current target. There's a few scattered mentions across other articles, so search results would be better. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete to facilitate uninhibited Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• That ♣@† → (Blooper) Bunny  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, an internet search didn't turn up any relevant results. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. TV Tropes [1] claims, without a source, that the short is also titled "That ♣@†#⚡!* Bunny!". Due to technical limitations it is not possible to have that as a page title as the # is interpreted as a section link leaving just this redirect, which would make it worth keeping if verifiable. In attempting to verify it I found the short on YouTube^[1] the title screen shows the first character is not ♣ but a stick of dynamite/TNT surrounded by a cloud. 🧨 (firecracker/dynamite) is probably a closer representation but this is also not found on Google. I'm also not convinced that using emoji here can be correct - the film, an American production, was released in 1991 while emoji were first introduced in Japan in 1997 and didn't become popular worldwide until the 2010s according to our article. Thryduulf (talk) 18:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete agreed it is not a club symbol. A redirect can be made for That Bunny! or That (Blooper) Bunny! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Tyhpoon Ofelia (1990) → 1990 Pacific typhoon season#Typhoon Ofelia (Bising)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Typhoon Chuck(11992) → 1992 Pacific typhoon season#Typhoon Chuck (Biring)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirects. The first redirect would be pronounced "Ty-poon" instead of "Ty-foon", and we don't have the redirect "Tyhpoon". The second redirect has two errors: The left bracket is too close the name, and there are two "1s" intead of one "1". Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and housekeeping, especially the second one with multiple typos. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Both are clear typos and anyone searching for that text would also have a typo. The correct names already exist as either a redirect (Chuck) or article (Ofelia) LarryJeff (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Untitled third Fantastic Beasts film → Untitled third Fantastic Beasts film  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary redirect from draftspace Starzoner (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:RDRAFT. Thryduulf (talk) 21:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as above. This spent significant time developing in draft so it's appropriate to keep the redirect. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per K4, RHARMFUL and RDRAFT. Unnecessary ≠ need to delete. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 00:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them 3 → Untitled third Fantastic Beasts film  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary redirect Starzoner (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:RDRAFT and ((R from move)). Thryduulf (talk) 21:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete didn't really spend time as an actual article with this title (just in 2017) before rename. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Striking out vote per J947's findings. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:RDRAFT. — Tartan357  ^(Talk) 22:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per K4, RHARMFUL and RDRAFT. Unnecessary ≠ need to delete. The article spent over a year at this title. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 00:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Secularity. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Secularity (non-religiosity) → Secular (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:XY. The DAB Secular (disambiguation), to which Secularity (disambiguation) redirects, has a section "Separate from religion" with half a dozen entries. I've gone through the articles that used this and except for the protected Joan of Arc essentially disambiguated them, often with more specific links to e.g secular state, secular education etc. This used to redirect to secularism, but I boldly changed it when listing here to target the disambiguation page. Still, it seems mildly harmful to imply that non-religious secularity is unambiguous wjhen patently it's not. It's essentially a tautology, so this does not make a good disambiguator. 94.21.78.115 (talk) 09:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as targetted to the disambiguation page, and tag as ((R from incomplete disambiguation)) to minimise the breaking of incoming external links and better help people who might use this as a search term. Thryduulf (talk) 11:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd already tagged it thus. It seems a strange thing to search for, especially when the "(disambiguation)" page already appears in the drop-down one could well expect that any other disambiguator would not be ambiguous. In a sense, incoming external links are always broken when a redirect target is changed, so that argument would prevent us ever deleting or retargeting any redirect. 94.21.78.115 (talk) 18:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment to the IP editor: you make already know this, but editing from a registered account would hide your IP address and enable you (after 10 edits) to edit pages like Joan of Arc (WP:SEMI). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do know that. 94.21.78.115 (talk) 18:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Revert bot edit and restore redirect to Secularity. Another case of double-redirect-fixing bots breaking things when redirections are reverted. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to established WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Secularity and tag with ((R from unnecessary disambiguation)). Yes, there are topics in the disambiguation page related to non-religiosity, but so is the primary topic itself. --BDD (talk) 20:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Secularity per BDD. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Zack Snyder's Justice League##ReleaseTheSnyderCut movement. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Josstice League → Justice League (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While this is a nickname given by some fans to the film, its not in wide use and is not mentioned in the target page. ★Trekker (talk) 03:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• As creator of the redirect, I have no preference what happens to it. If it's better to remove it I'll go along with it. Anyways, here's the source that mentions the "Josstice League" nickname. Do you think it has a place in the target page? --WuTang94 (talk) 04:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Re-target to Justice League This might be a common misspelling I don't know, but it would be better suited here, since most of the times when people say justice league they are referring to the group, not the movie. Blaze The Movie Fan (talk) 18:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is not a common misspelling. This is a fannickname for a specific adaptation of the JL.★Trekker (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Zack Snyder's Justice League where explained. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 13:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Zack Snyder's Justice League##ReleaseTheSnyderCut movement as the "Josstice League" nickname is explained there. — Tartan357  ^(Talk) 22:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Zack Snyder's Justice League##ReleaseTheSnyderCut movement per the above. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to List of fandom names. (non-admin closure) Heart ^(talk) 06:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Arianator → Ariana Grande  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Lovatic → Demi Lovato  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Directioner → One Direction  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Arianators → Ariana Grande  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Lovatics → Demi Lovato  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Directioners → One Direction  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Please retarget all of them to List of fandom names as they are not mentioned in the current targets. See also the previous discussion for Swifties (fans of Taylor Swift) and for Selenator (fans of Selena Gomez. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to list the plurals. I can't add a RfD tag on Directioners because it is fully protected. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget all to List of fandom names per nom and apply the same to all similar current and future redirects as needed, with exceptions to those redirects where the targets validly sources the fandom names. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget all and add to List of fandom names per nom. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget all because the aforementioned list actually mentions these fanbase names. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Lucky Charmes → No Money (song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nonsense redirect; artist only remixed the target single. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Lucky Charms as an ((R from alternative spelling)). Delete per !votes below. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This term is ambiguous and this redirect may cause confusion. There 6 uses of this term (at this spelling) in Enwiki and delete would enable uninhibited Search. Do not retarget as misspelling: those 6 uses are not misspellings. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable DJ not mentioned in target article. Not likely alternative spelling. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 13:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, this DJ doesn't seem notable enough for their own article, and they're only mentioned mostly as having done remixes of songs. On a side note, nice signature, AngusWOOF. Regards, SONIC678 15:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Shunya yamashita → Square Enix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect from a non-notable person to a company article where that person is not mentioned once. Originally it redirected to Shunya Yamashita, but was changed to redirect to Square Enix in 2011, when the former article was redirected to the latter; in 2016 that redirection was reversed (for being an "unexplained and confusing redirect"), leading the "Shunya Yamashita" page to be deleted by PROD in 2016, leaving this redirect. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{☎ Dinoguy1000} 02:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as effectively a WP:CSD#G8. Wikipedia no longer has any article about him, and none of the individual character articles which mention him would make a good target either. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since the correct capitalisation is a redlink. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the above, why should this exist when the correctly capitalized version was deleted? Regards, SONIC678 15:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.