The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete without prejudice to disambiguation. Consensus is clear that this title redirecting to the current target is not useful, and also that some sort of disambiguation would be better. However, this has been open since March and nobody has drafted a disambiguation page yet and it doesn't seem likely one is imminent so there seems little to no benefit in leaving this open longer. Thryduulf (talk) 12:12, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Roman equivalent → Interpretatio graeca  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I understand how the redirect text arises in this context, but "Roman equivalent" is far too generic a concept to redirect this way. A reader might want to find the "Roman equivalent" of ancient weights and measures, of later Italian or Byzantine institutions, or of any number of other things. The target article has several better redirects for those trying to find it without using the specific page title, and the redirect is too generic to point to any specific thing, so it should be deleted 50.248.234.77 (talk) 14:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it could be applied to several concepts—the titles of which may not be altogether intuitive—perhaps it would make sense to list them on a disambiguation page under this title. Otherwise, perhaps choose the most likely target (the mythological use seems slightly more probable than weights and measures, IMO), and place a hatnote there for other uses. P Aculeius (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate There are many things which could be referred to as "Roman equivalent", such as Roman numeral equivalents of Arabic numbers. 053pvr (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate There are Roman equivalents of many, many modern things. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate or just delete. The current targeting is clearly not optimal. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless someone has a concrete proposal of what should be disambiguated a this title. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. From my search, mythology is the primary usage of the term. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:53, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate , many equivalents exist, makes no sense for it to only link to one. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 14:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This RfD has been open for over a month. The consensus seems to be to disambiguate. The only problem now is finding all the Roman equivalents of things. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having to find all the Roman equivalents of things is precisely why disambiguating is problematic. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep unless someone has the draft of a proposed disambig page. Jay (talk) 16:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete with no prejudice to the later creation of a disambiguation page. I agree that it isn't clear it's feasible to create a disambiguation page, and that we should wait to let someone do so rather than attempting to decree one into existence. The current target is confusing enough that it's better to delete pending the creation of a disambiguation page than to keep. Tamwin (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment for closer: If consensus is still unclear at the next review of this nomination, may I suggest that the closer consider a no consensus close per WP:RELIST, possibly noting that there is consensus to allow the creation of a disambiguation page if people can figure out what to put in it? It doesn't seem like this discussion is going to converge, because even if everyone agrees that a disambiguation page is an acceptable outcome, they don't seem to agree on what to do until one is created. Tamwin (talk) 19:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• It was a very bad practice relist, considering that (a) it should have been closed, (b) the relister had !voted, and (c) the relister is clueless in regards to RfD process. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 01:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not very nice, that is ad hominem. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • No it isn't. It was a point directly related to the argument itself considering WP:NACD. It is not directed as an insult. And even if it were, it would be non-fallacious ad hominem. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC) — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • @J947: I am not clueless as regard to the RfD process. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 10:09, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• It's kind of annoying that this is still open. If nobody is willing to create a disambiguation page, then closing as disambiguation shouldn't be done, it should just be deleted. Editors who object to that can best do so by creating some disambiguation page. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 18:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Åker (disambiguatuion) → Åker  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was created as a redirect with a typo, even though Åker (disambiguation) had been existing for more than six years. Delete per WP:RDAB. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unneeded, per WP:RDAB. Tamwin (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• You'll Never Walk Alone (disambiuguation) → You'll Never Walk Alone (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Moved from this title within three minutes, this redirect should be deleted per WP:RDAB. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unneeded, per WP:RDAB. Tamwin (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:42, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Michael Heller (disambiuguation) → Michael Heller  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was created with the edit summary of "per WP:INTDABLINK", even though he correctly spelt Michael Heller (disambiguation) had already been existing for almost four years. This typo should probably be deleted per WP:RDAB. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unneeded, per WP:RDAB. Tamwin (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:42, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Dani Fernández (disambiguatuion) → Daniel Fernández  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Dani Fernández (disambiguation) was moved from this title a day after creation (and then moved/merged to the current target of this redirect). Per WP:RDAB, there is no worth in keeping this around. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unneeded, per WP:RDAB. Tamwin (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Florence Lake (desambiguation) → Florence Lake (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Moved a minute after creation; should be deleted per WP:RDAB. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unneeded, per WP:RDAB. Tamwin (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, delete. Fimbriata (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was actually a spelling mistake, in Spanish the Disambiguation page has an 'e', which carried into the title of this page. No need to keep it. Fimbriata (talk) 21:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Crow people (digambiguation) → Crow people (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target page name was corrected within minutes, but this redirect from an unlikely misspelling should be deleted for WP:RDAB reasons. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unneeded, per WP:RDAB. Tamwin (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unneeded, per WP:RDAB. Less Unless (talk) 18:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 10:17, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Java jep → Template:Java JEP  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @SWinxy with the reason "Template renamed and no uses of this one exist. Not worth keeping it." FASTILY 08:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Obvious capitalisation variant, no potential for harm that I can see, former title of the template (for 12 days last month). – Uanfala (talk) 00:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Uanfala. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 01:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Clearly made in error, and at no point contained a men's team. No current transclusions. Primefac (talk) 17:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Japan men's volleyball squad 1996 Summer Olympics → Template:Japan women's volleyball squad 1996 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:R3 Implausible typos. User:BrownHairedGirl's mistake. Sawol (talk) 06:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Sawol, I see no involvement by me. If I have missed something, please the diff of my error. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  BHG, I believe they are referring to this move, where it got moved from "...female..." to "...men's..." for the page name. Primefac (talk) 11:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Ah, thanks Primefac. Looks like I moved it to the wrong title. Sorry. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:05, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Agni(2004 Film) → Agni (2004 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

wp:UNNATURAL error, from which the target article was moved minutes after creation. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete implausible. Less Unless (talk) 18:32, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Zombotiny → Plants vs. Zombies  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at current target or Plants vs. Zombies (video game), delete unless a justification can be provided; misspelling of Zombotany. Chompy Ace 21:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Apparently refers to a minigame, ZomBotany or Zombotany, related to the current target. But given that it is not mentioned at target and the correct form of the redirect does not exist, deletion is certainly called for here. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.