This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 11, 2021.
Template:SORTIERUNG:Lasorling
Unused template redirect intended for use in just one article (presumably). The DEFAULTSORT followed by colon system has since replaced ((DEFAULTSORT)). – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- This can be deleted. What would be more useful would be to somehow redirect, convert or replace the de.wiki template ((SORTIERUNG)) to ((DEFAULTSORT)) but I don't know how to do that. Bermicourt (talk) 16:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cheating on You (song)
Should Cheating on You (song) be retargeted to Cheating on You, or should Cheating on You (song) and Cheating on You (Charlie Puth song) both be deleted (or tagged as a redirect from unnecessary disambiguation)? -- dylx 14:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
🇸🇺
This doesn't seem to be a real emoji. I can't find any reference for this. Gonnym (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Aquaduct of Sulvius
A new redirect with two spelling errors (cf Aqueduct of Sylvius). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Business Information Systems
"Business Information System" is not mentioned at the target in plural, singular, capitalised or uncapitalised forms. Is there a better target, or should these redirects be deleted as ambiguous (with, for example, YTJ (Finnish government service))? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It is a plausible search term for the subject of the article, so it is fine for the redirect to exist, even if it is not mentioned at the target. WP:HARMLESS. SCP-053 (talk) 02:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- SCP-053 I don't believe these are the same thing, I'm certainly not seeing them being used in an interchangeable way with a google search. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.Relisting comment: One more go...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fear the Hunters
Isn't mentioned in the article and no idea what alternative name it is referring to. Gonnym (talk) 15:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: That user is/was well-known (see their talk page) for prematurely creating redirects for Walking Dead episodes based on rumors/unverified reports regarding titles for upcoming episodes. Drovethrughosts (talk) 15:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
COVID-19 Hospital
This is too specific a topic for the redirect title. feminist (talk) 05:45, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment At one point, this page did have text on it: [1]. However, I agree that the current target should be deleted or changed; perhaps Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospitals? AllegedlyHuman (talk) 06:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment to me this title refers to hospitals specifically set up for COVID-19, like the NHS Nightingale hospitals, or the insta-build hospitals in China, and not a specific hospital in particular. If this article is to exist, it should be a list of such hospitals or point to such a list. -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 07:09, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- With a quick search, I found two articles on temporary hospitals with a COVID focus: Fangcang hospital for China, and COVID-19 hospitals in the United Kingdom. I don't think we have anything on temporary buildings or structures generally (hence my nomination of Temporary structure above), let alone hospitals. The base COVID-19 pandemic has links to the British and Chinese uses, but would require further searching to locate within the article. Besides the current target, Category:Hospitals established for the COVID-19 pandemic has relevant content, so maybe the best solution would be a disambiguation page, which could eventually progress (perhaps via WP:CONCEPTDAB) to a real article. --BDD (talk) 19:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsuitable redirect (and bad caps for an article/dab-page title) since there are too many possible meanings. Whether any of the proposed alternatives are more acceptable is another question. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Disambig per BDD with at least COVID-19 hospitals in the United Kingdom, Hospital ships involved in the COVID-19 pandemic, Fangcang hospital and a link to the category listed. Pedantically the dab should be at a title something like Covid-19 hospitals but wherever the dab is this title is a useful search term than should redirect to it. Thryduulf (talk) 02:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Covid-19 hospitals per Thryduulf. And that can redirect to Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospitals per AllegedlyHuman. I would like to see that article dealing with new hospitals set up for Covid as well as existing hospitals modified to treat Covid. Jay (talk) 04:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to "Covid-19 hospitals" and then Delete "COVID-19 Hospital". Jay (talk) 12:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:MOVEREDIRECT. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 05:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- No clue on what that guide is trying to say, however I changed the vote to clarify what I meant by rename. Jay (talk) 12:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Moving redirects is pretty much benefitless. Just create a new redirect. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 21:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Moving preserves page history, and the redirect has a lot because it was a merge with the target, before the redirect happened. Jay (talk) 19:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no point in moving the redirect anyway because COVID-19 Hospital is a completely normal search term that shouldn't be deleted. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 20:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it's a normal search term, but there needn't be a page with that search term. Jay (talk) 21:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not? — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 22:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 02:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply] - Delete as ambiguous and likely to cause confusion. Someone can create a disambiguation page or SIA at Covid-19 hospitals if they wish. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Going green
Should this redirect be targeted to Environmentalism or Environmentally friendly or some other target? Interstellarity (talk) 00:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]