October 17

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 17, 2021.

Taagad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect not named in target for the purposes of explaining or contextualizing why it redirects there. Bearcat (talk) 23:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Indian nation

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 25#Indian nation

Internally riffled boiler tubes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Anarchyte (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete. Only one article (GWR No. 36) used this, and that now links direct. It does not seem a likely or common mis-spelling. Verbarson (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Courtenay Edward Stevens

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Resolved. Article created, discussion is now moot. (non-admin closure) Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The link for the classicist Courtenay Edward Stevens redirects to his wife, the author Leila Buckley. It seems to me that this should be removed, leaving a red link which will hopefully one day be populated. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Richard Groff

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Richard Groff and Regis Groff are not the same persons, and "Richard" is not mentioned in Regis' article. Geschichte (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

San Diego Wave FC

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 13:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not in the article, and I can't find reliable sourcing that would indicate that this is the name. I see some social media rumblings, but I don't think that's enough to make a redirect. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2030 in association football

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No consensus for the retarget proposition even after relisting. Most suitable outcome from the discussion is to delete under WP:TOOSOON. Anarchyte (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was targeted here by an IP before the article on the 2030 FIFA World Cup was created. This redirect doesn't make sense because the 2030 FIFA World Cup is not the only major association football event that will take place in 2030. It is also worth noting that articles on prior years of association football do not exist (for instance there is no article on 2025 in association football). So I'd propose deleting this page or possibly retargeting this page somewhere else. ColinBear (talk - contributions) 19:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of Tavix's proposal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.