February 14

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 14, 2022.

Abu Farès Mosque

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: different objects "Abu Fares" is not the same as "Ben Fares" and "Abu FAres" is not discussed in the target article. Loew Galitz (talk) 23:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PopCap Games Framework

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 22#PopCap Games Framework

Retrograde Islam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target; usage in peer-reviewed texts seems to be limited to descriptions of Wahhabism or other fundamentalist or reactionary Islamic movements and/or societies, which are not synonymous with the target. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 19:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jacarean

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Already retargeted to Yacare caiman. @Kevmin: you shouldn't have changed the redirect's target while the discussion was still open. Please be patient next time and wait for the community to decide. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 19:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Refactored the link to Yacare caiman.--Kevmin § 22:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

William Patrick Gold

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 22#William Patrick Gold

Binding antibody unit

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 24#Binding antibody unit

Basketball at the 2024 Summer Olympics

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#Basketball at the 2024 Summer Olympics

George Traut Austin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 22:47, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While I can somewhat understand having redirects to wiktionary (as dicdefs are out of scope, but can be useful for jargon), why would we redirect for biographies? Either a person is notable, and should have an article here; or they aren't notable, but then we shouldn't outsource to a different site with different standards. This seems like a backdoor mechanism to have biographies of people included without having to care about our policies. It also obscures what would otherwise be redlinks iff the person is notable.

Also nominated for the same reason are all other similar pages:

However, it is completely unclear to me what syntax to use to group multiple soft redirects under one RfD, so any help is welcome!

Fram (talk) 15:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brothers and Sisters in Christ

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus (default to revert/unrefine). There was clear consensus in August to keep at Body of Christ, no section link, despite the lack of an explicit mention; I don't see consensus here to overturn that. Thryduulf makes a good point that a DAB may be viable here, and this close does not prevent any user from creating one. Normally a no-consensus close would mean that we keep, but, in this case, as the current target was picked in knowing defiance of the previous RfD, the default is to revert. (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 23:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what this redirect is supposed to refer to. It also has capital letters which may designate an organisation which is not mentioned in the article. The expression is only alluded to once in the article ("The Body of Christ, broken in the sacred liturgy, can be seen, through charity and sharing, in the faces and persons of the most vulnerable of our brothers and sisters"), and not within the section targetted. The redirect seems too vague to do anything with it. I think therefore the redirect should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 15:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
@Thryduulf: the B.A.S.I.C. website probably uses capital letters at "Body of Christ" as a form of honorific, the ones used when referring to something held in high regards. Veverve (talk) 18:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 02:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have no other target to disambiguate with. Narky Blert (alt) (talk) 11:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: it appears you did not proparlt format your answer. Could you fix it? Veverve (talk) 20:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
done DGG ( talk ) 06:49, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Party foul

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:SSRT: "Please keep in mind that only topics with a less-than-encyclopedic scope that are commonly wikified words or that are repeatedly recreated should become soft redirects. We don't need a soft redirect for every possible word or phrase to be included in Wikipedia." Not every word combination found in urban dictionary and Wiktionary should become a soft redirect here: "party foul" isn't really commonly used on enwiki, and the meaning isn't so obscure that an explanation is needed either. Fram (talk) 10:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:BC

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#Wikipedia:BC

Ângulo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
06:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the nomination below the rationale is WP:RLOTE; no affinity to Portuguese or Spanish.--65.93.195.118 (talk) 00:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ángulo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to Portuguese or Spanish. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
06:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Delen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to Dutch. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
06:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Diamètre

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to French. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
06:06, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Geometrisk ort

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to Swedish. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
06:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Analytisk geometri

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to Swedish. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
06:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beckton Riverside station

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#Beckton Riverside station

Washingon state legislature

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 04:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This exists as a alternate capitalization redirect but it's also a misspelling that while possible does not seem to be likely based on the pageview numbers, so I recommend it be deleted. TartarTorte 03:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.