The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Kelmitt → Bad Bunny discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Kelmitt not mentioned in this article at all. There might have been some cooperation between Kelmitt and Bad Bunny which was removed, but even if there was, there are many other artists they cooperated with which this redirect hides e.g. Farruko, Arcángel etc. Muhandes (talk) 21:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Thomas Allen (divine, Thomas Allen (1608–1673))) → Thomas Allen (nonconformist)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Thomas Allen (divine, Thomas Allen (1608-1673))) → Thomas Allen (nonconformist)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Thomas Allen (divine, Thomas Allen (1608–1673)) → Thomas Allen (nonconformist)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Thomas Allen (divine, Thomas Allen (1608-1673)) → Thomas Allen (nonconformist)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete all. The ones with three close parentheses originate from a move that lasted less than a minute and are clearly mistaken (having mismatched parentheses); the ones with two close parentheses originate from a title that lasted for a bit over a day. Overall, these disambiguators are unlikely to be helpful given that they also contain the name of the person. There's also Thomas Allen (divine, (1608–1673)) and a hyphen variant, but the page was at that title for a few months. eviolite (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. We don't need repetitive titles here, much less in the disambiguator. Those are just unlikely to be searched for. Regards, SONIC678 20:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nomination. I suggest to also delete Thomas Allen (divine, (1608–1673)), the title is non-standard and very unlikely to be searched for either, because of all the brackets, the comma & ndash. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 09:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• ApiSci → Portal (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - There is no evidence that it is a commonly used abbreviation for Aperture Science, and was created unilaterally by a now-banned user. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Few pageviews and nothing on Google to suggest this term has any relevance. eviolite (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Subtitles. Jay (talk) 06:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Video captions → Video capture  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was moved to Video captures two days after creation, which was later merged as a duplicate article. It looks like this would be better as a redirect to subtitles, of which "captions" is usually a synonym. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:REDYES. Also, subtitles are not captions and the synonymity is unfortunate. Veverve (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete simply does not make sense. Capture, captions, and subtitles are three different things. If we don't have an content on captions this shouldn't exist. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. QuickQuokka ^[talk] 13:10, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to the Subtitles article, which discusses captions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Mx. Granger. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Subtitles per nomination & per Mx. Granger. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 10:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Medizinische Papyri aus Lahun → Kahun Papyri  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:RLOTE I can find no connection between these ancient egyptian papyri and the german language. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 12:27, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Place of worship. ✗plicit 12:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Holy building → Grande Arche  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I think that someone searching for this is far more likley to be looking for information on religious buildings than misspelling "Holey building" (nominated below). I don't know what would be the best target for this though, Sacral architecture? Place of worship? Something else entireley? 192.76.8.77 (talk) 12:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Place of worship as what is seemingly the best target for it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Place of worship per User:Zxcvbnm, though I'm open to another retarget if someone wants to suggest something more appropriate. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Holey building → Grande Arche  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target here is not the only building with a hole in it and does not appear to be widely referred to by this name. The HTML comment left by the creator this is that French building with a huge hole in it, hence holey building suggests to me that this is a name that was made-up by the editor. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 12:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As vague and unclear whether it's a misspelling or referring to buildings with literal holes in them. Search function would be more helpful in this case. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, too vague. When I saw this title, I thought of the CCTV Headquarters building in Beijing, and there are surely many others that it could describe. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Malignancy. Jay (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Malignancies → Cancer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Would this be more useful if retargeted to Malignancy? (WP:PLURALPT: "Because most articles ... have singular titles, the normal situation is that a plural redirects to its singular") Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support the retarget per nom. Veverve (talk) 11:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Malignancy per nom. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Orange Ball. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Orange ball → Basketball (ball)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Descriptive, but hopeless ambiguous. This does not seem to be the primary topic for "orange ball" Hog Farm _Talk 01:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wondering what on Earth it could redirect to, I looked to see what the world outwith Wikipedia thought. And I learned that an orange ball (association football) used to be used when playing in the snow. But our article doesn't mention that. Uncle G (talk) 03:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • A gas station, an album or a plant perhaps? Other sport articles that mention an orange ball include street hockey, snooker, golf, football, and putt-putt. -- Tavix ^(talk) 04:42, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, no. Because (apart from the two that actually have names that match, one of which the search would go to anyway, as observed by A7V2) the rest are balls that are orange in a purely descriptive fashion. Hence why I wondered what on Earth it could redirect to that was specifically, in some way, an "orange ball" of some significance rather than just a ball that was orange. (A white horse isn't just a horse that is white.) There's the occasional special use as a sign for ships, but that doesn't appear to be an actual widespread rule anywhere that I could find. Uncle G (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: way too vague. Veverve (talk) 07:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate Comment - if deleted, then searching this will (unless I'm mistaken) automatically take you to Orange Ball, so perhaps a DAB would be a better option since there appears to be several terms which can and are referred to in this way. A7V2 (talk) 22:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Amongst what? Buddleja globosa has the alternative name orange ball tree, not orange ball. (It is ironic that we do not even redirect that alternative title.) What could a disambiguation article list? What are the multiple overlapping redirects from alternative titles that need disambiguating here? What on Earth can this redirect to? Uncle G (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • All the !votes so far apart from mine are to delete for some variation of this being ambiguous. If that is the case (that this is ambiguous), deletion will not fix the problem since searching this will not bring up search, but instead take you to the article Orange Ball (if this is deleted). There are numerous possibilities of what this could be consisdered ambiguous with. Most of them aren't particularly convincing but together I think perhaps enough to justify a DAB rather than retarget to Orange Ball (which is almost the effect of deletion as far as search is concerned. I was initially going to put "comment" instead of "disambiguate" as I'm not necessarily advocating this, more that I think deletion (as opposed to retargeting or creating a DAB) won't solve the problems raised. A7V2 (talk) 22:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have changed my !vote to simply a comment as I had originally intended. I still believe that deletion is not the right option as it won't fix the issues raised by delete !voters. A7V2 (talk) 00:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the Sun is referred to as an "orange ball" in many a work. And then there's the orange, a fruit shaped like a ball, or the grapefruit -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Orange Ball as a ((R from incorrect capitalisation)). Thryduulf (talk) 22:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 05:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Orange Ball as a ((R from incorrect capitalisation)) as per Thryduulf. This makes the most sense, and directly applies. As for the sun, I've always heard it referred to as the YELLOW ball in the sky, not orange, but what do I know. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 16:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Orange Ball as a ((R from incorrect capitalisation)). The other options are just invented search terms that are implausible (and I own a can of orange tennis balls).—Bagumba (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.