< June 20
June 22 >

June 21

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 21, 2023.

Jews deportation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Expulsions and exoduses of Jews. (non-admin closure) J947 † edits 22:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are several times in history when Jews were deported. As well, if kept, it should probably point towards the deportation section. 162.83.141.156 (talk) 21:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wire guidance

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Missiles are not the only things that can be wire-guided. Other wire-guided projectiles include torpedoes and submersibles. The French Wikipedia has a broad article on wire guidance, and so could we, so we should delete these all per WP:REDYES. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tere Ishq Ke Naam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently targeted to an actress that appears in the television program; could equally target Nida Mumtaz and Munazzah Arif. All three targets would be misleading, as none contain sufficient information about the program. Unless this can be expanded into an article- and based on my cursory searches, I don't think it can- I would suggest this be deleted as misleading. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 20:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Old Earth (Dune)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 28#Old Earth (Dune)

Mars (Doctor Who)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 28#Mars (Doctor Who)

2023–24 1. FC Heidenheim season

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Red link to encourage page creation. The redirect was created back in March, way too prematurely. Dl.thinker (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Measuring phonemes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 16:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per the section this redirect targets, this subject of this redirect actually refers to Linguistic anthropology#First paradigm: anthropological linguistics ... if anything. However, this article in general doesn't discuss this subject in sufficient detail, but it doesn't seem as though Phoneme does either, so I'm defaulting to delete here. Steel1943 (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean and I'm the creator so perhaps that is the problem. I'm surprised to learn
  • Go to place
  • Record linguistics data
isn't common. Anthropologists only do after field cataloging & comparison? Invasive Spices (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We must be talking at cross purposes. I don't understand your question. More importantly, I don't understand what "measuring phonemes" could mean in any literal sense. While speech sounds are recorded, a phoneme is "generally regarded as an abstraction of a set of speech sounds that are perceived as equivalent" and is therefore not in any place, available to record. Cnilep (talk) 06:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tulsi Gabbard's position on the 2017 Shayrat missile strikes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 16:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are several politicians mentioned in the target section, making it a bit cumbersome for readers who may search this term expecting to clearly know where this subject is located, only to have to still skim for a minute or two to find .. the one sentence in the sea of sentences and politician mentioned in this section. So, probably delete this redirect as somewhat unhelpful and, though I'm not sure how notable this subject may be, WP:REDLINK. Steel1943 (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

FCC standards

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was unrefine. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 16:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FCC does more than just content regulation; it also regulates aspects of technology regarding radio wave frequencies other entires can use and/or have access to. To pigeonhole readers into this section is misleading, but I'm not sure if this redirect should be deleted or if it should be weak retargeted to Federal Communications Commission (without the section redirect). (Note: A similar title, FCC regulations, does not exist.) Steel1943 (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Conservation status of Bombyx mori

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 16:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it's in the infobox, and that's it. Readers looking for more information about this subject at the target article will be sadly disappointed. Steel1943 (talk) 16:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mexican hate group

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 16:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found this tagged for speedy deletion as "attack page", but I don't think it qualifies. I don't know if it is meant to be about a hate group made of Mexicans or a group of people hating Mexicans; in any case, it seems to have little connection to the target, but is old enough that RFD is the best option. —Kusma (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only one group in the list can be reasonably labelled a "hate group", and it doesn't have an article. I also can't find any suitable target. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Drovers (Fictonal Farm)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page used to be an article about Drovers Run at the time it was created, after which it was redirected to the current target by Daniel99091. I'm not sure we should still have this lying around either, since it doesn't seem to get very many pageviews nowadays since the move compared to the target and the correctly spelled Drovers (fictional farm). Regards, SONIC678 01:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 04:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gun politics in Indonesia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. ✗plicit 07:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Gun politics" is a US-centric term. The target sections only cover gun control laws, and makes no mention of gun ownership being a political issue in Indonesia or Israel. Delete as misleading/unhelpful redirects. Paul_012 (talk) 08:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC), 08:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Reign of Marcus

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. ✗plicit 07:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to me. ★Trekker (talk) 10:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yunfei (Samurai Shodown)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 28#Yunfei (Samurai Shodown)

Oceangate Tower

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 03:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained redirect. Who calls this Oceangate? Schierbecker (talk) 00:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Particularly, from article history, there is a reference to a skyscrapernews.com entry on a different skyscraper, which mentions a "Swansea's 'Oceangate' tower (107m)" which is "expected to see construction in 2006/2007". This matches up with the Meridian Quay's height and construction start period, but I don't know whether that's enough to narrow down whether this is the same building. Randi🦋TalkContribs 17:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I missed that in the article history. I would say that it is likely the same building, but that there is enough wiggle room that it is fully confirmed. ((R from former name)) and/or ((R from alternate names)) could apply if there was concrete proof. For now, it might be best that this ends up deleted with a possible chance that the future does give a proper reference that could be used to restore this. --Super Goku V (talk) 02:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
More