If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/His excellency))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

His excellency (6th)

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 06:59, 21 July 2007

Clearly a sock of someone, who is wikistalking me. Arrow740 06:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed Such as who the master sockpuppet is? Rlest 14:37, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Delisted This has no code letter, and although it's named after His excellency, the description sentence says " a sock of someone", possibly implying the the person who filed doesn't know the name of the stalker. GrooveDog (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Relisted Sorry about that. Arrow740 21:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He has taken further action, and now has all the signs of His excellency. Arrow740 23:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Added User:Longroads, picked up where User:Pilotjokes left off.Proabivouac 00:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Added User:Snakesplace--SefringleTalk 02:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Added User:Weeksduty.Proabivouac 02:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Added User:Mahmoodh per Arrow740.Proabivouac 22:29, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Added User:Cheszmastre, User:MiiMiiM, User:MiiMiiMiiM and User:MiiMiis per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Matt57. Already on the short list of likely suspects, His excellency is implicated further by the fact that User:Cheszmastre, definitely a sock, and almost certainly His excellency based on contribs, is the one who created the (since deleted) Matt57 sockpuppet page.Proabivouac 22:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Deferred Dmcdevit (talk · contribs). Mackensen (talk) 23:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: DMC seems to be on break or something, he hasn't made an edit since July 20th. Kwsn(Ni!) 15:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed all of these except Cheszmastre, who is  Inconclusive. The behavior is incredibly suggestive though. Mackensen (talk) 00:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His excellency (5th)

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 03:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Evidence:

 Clerk note: Moved discussion off to talk Kwsn(Ni!) 01:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed: Error1010, Evenpaint, Fishofg, Benizer, Tonysop, Frebruddy, Chestinput, Protectpeople, Lekociv

Also  Confirmed, though not in the request: Oneandonly666 (talk · contribs), Quidproquid (talk · contribs), and Shipslucky (talk · contribs)

 Inconclusive: Msarkar

Red X Unrelated: Vice regent

Dmcdevit·t 05:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His excellency (4th)

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 07:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Ibn Shah shows the same behavior as MomoShomo who was blocked as a possible sock of H.E., in taking out a certain person from this list relating to religious beliefs. Ibn Shah ([1]) and MomoShomo ([2],[3], [4]) both argue that this person on the lists is "not notable because he doesnt have his own article". Ibn Shah is also interested in Islamophobia ([5],[6],[7]) as was His Excellency ([8],[9],[10]). --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 17:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Please include a link to the closed arbitration case per the instructions. Cbrown1023 talk 17:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/His_excellency Cbrown1023 talk 17:46, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, added the link above as well. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 17:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed that Ibn Shah == MomoShomo. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 18:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: discussion has been moved to the talk page, please use that for any further comments. --ST47Talk 11:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ibn Shah is Unrelated to Habibz, Gridges, or Yorkuz. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 05:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[Discussion moved to talk page]
 Clerk assistance requested: Clerks, please remove all the threaded conversation in this case to the talk page. Thank you. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 03:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have His excellency's old CheckUser results, and  Confirmed that Ibn Shah and MomoShomo are both His excellency. Dmcdevit·t 20:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His excellency (3rd)

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 07:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Admins - Forgive me, I didn't know if I could (or should) do the Archive template properly... This user "His excellency" just went through a checkuser. It appears another sock has surfaced. Evidence is presented per the conversation here [11] (I will copy and paste below):

I'm just looking for your opinion here. There's a new user named Abureem who has a very confrontational style [12], is interested in defending Wahhabism[13] just like His excellency[14] (also uses the word "pejorative" like H.E.). Abureem referred to people as bigots and islamophobes in a similar manner to H.E. and also happily broke 3RR just as the H.E. puppets do. What do you think? Should I bring another checkuser request? or just keep an eye on this one? --ProtectWomen 07:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that's him. Fire up the CheckUser. - Merzbow 08:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
These appear to me as well to be the same user.Proabivouac 08:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: archived the previous case. -- lucasbfr talk 13:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive. Looks unrelated but editing patterns are still quite strong.Voice-of-All 14:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His excellency

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 21:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Yet another sockpuppet from ArbCom and community-banned His_excellency (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). (See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/His_excellency, and Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_His_excellency). He has returned to his favorite punching bag, Criticism of Islam.

Lots of recent sockpuppet activity, including blocked MomoShomo who made a big stink on my userpage about my gender/orientation and its relationship to Islam. After being blocked as MomoShomo, he returned as Habibz to continue complaining about my userpage [15] (as if he spoke on behalf of all Muslims).

There is no question this is H.E. --ProtectWomen 21:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; one of H.E.'s favorite haunts was the "Criticism of the critics" area of Criticism of Islam, this sock seems to be an SPA focused exclusively on that area. The accusations of bigotry, etc. are all par for the course for our guy. - Merzbow 21:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added Gridges (talk · contribs); created just after I blocked Habibz (talk · contribs) for the sole reason of complaining about the block. -- tariqabjotu 21:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added Yorkuz (talk · contribs); created in order to revert a couple of Habibz edits on Criticism of Islam and then blank large sections just because he was mad about getting blocked on his last couple of sockpuppets. I've been looking at the contribs of His excellency (talk · contribs) and it appears to present a long history of disruption, incivility and use of puppets(including anonymous-IP) to avoid the indefinite ban.

 Confirmed. Voice-of-All 02:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His excellency

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 23:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Yet another sockpuppet from ArbCom and community-banned His_excellency (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). (See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/His_excellency, and Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_His_excellency). He has returned to his favorite punching bag, Criticism of Islam, and has also resumed complaining on Jimbo's talk page, both classic H.E. behaviors. On the topic of Criticism of Islam, compare these edits from H.E: [16] [17], with these from a recently banned sock of his: [18] [19] (this discussion spawned off the CoI talk page here), against these from Coldbud: [20], [21], and [22]. On the topic of Jimbo's talk page, compare this H.E. edit: [23] to this from Coldbud: [24]. I think the behavioral evidence is enough for a block even without CheckUser, but I'm assuming CheckUser can end this quickly given the data should be available per his many recent socks. - Merzbow 23:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Dmcdevit·t 18:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


More