Barthateslisa

Barthateslisa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

21 January 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

They seem to have a tendency with claiming Maratha victories on articles and censoring Maratha losses. Xtremedood (talk) 13:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To add, also, in this article Battle of Saunshi as seen here [13] you can see that the user (43.225.72.41) also uses the same tactic claiming a Maratha victory, when the source clearly states a Maratha defeat. Earlier, user:D4iNa4 tried to get this article deleted, which resulted in a decision to keep it, as seen here [[14]]. Similarly, user:D4iNa4, over here [15] tried to work together with user:Capitals00 to support the nonsensical claim of an Indian victory for the Cho La incident. They also seem to have the tendency of claiming an "Indian Victory" in this article and have worked together against user:Zanhe. You can also see there edits on the article over here [16]. Similarly user:Capitals00 edits the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 article to exclude Bangladesh in the results section, as seen over here [17], even though through a discussion and consensus, it was agreed upon to include Bangladesh in the results section, see here [18] and [19]. User:Capitals00 also makes the fictitious claim (using the same tactic) that the mentioned sources over here [20] state Bangladesh did not win, when that is not what the sources state. Xtremedood (talk) 14:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This report is no Declined as baseless. The filer has a history of filing baseless SPIs, generally against the same accounts. I've warned the filer in the past and have now blocked the filer for a week. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

I don't know much about this master, so I'm hoping a CU could double-check. I notice significant similarities to Shimlaites, one of the most recent CU-confirmed accounts of Barthateslisa.

That's all I got. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


The user is engaging in lot of edit wars like Shimlaites did with me on Untitled Sanjay Dutt Biopic article. Please check it.Jack Shukla AKA TKSS & Paplesh. (talk) 13:46, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vanjagenije Here are some diffs which i can show you clearly matches his edits to Shimlaites who was again a sock. The links are:
Yes these are the proofs which i have but you are saying that it didn't match their editing pattern only the warning matches but you can still check both account's ip's to see if they have used similar ip's or not. That all i can suggest. Jack Shukla AKA TKSS & Paplesh. (talk) 01:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]
If you can see clearly their warning is very much similar Jack Shukla AKA TKSS & Paplesh. (talk) 01:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Comments by other users

I think he is the same sock. See[22]. It might help.-Umair Aj (talk) 16:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC) Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

I have been suspicious of User:NineTimes for a while now. We have been involved in edit wars in several Bollywood articles. I previously had similar edit wars in several Bollywood articles with User:SoniaKovind, who made similar edits to NineTimes. SoniaKovind was banned after it turned out he is a sockpuppet of User:Barthateslisa in July 2017. Just a month later, the first edit of NineTimes appeared in August 2017. Some of the similarities between them:

The evidence above looks strong enough for me to suspect that the two accounts, SoniaKovind (sockpuppet of Barthateslisa) and NineTimes, must belong to the same person. Maestro2016 (talk) 23:05, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have also added User:ThreeTwentyTwo, in light of NineTimes' sockpuppet allegation against me here. Knowing SoniaKovind, I wouldn't be surprised if he created User:ThreeTwentyTwo for the purpose of attacking and harassing me. SoniaKovind has harassed me before, and threatened to get me banned (as you can see on my talk page), so I wouldn't be surprised if he created this User:ThreeTwentyTwo in an attempt to do just that. Maestro2016 (talk) 01:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Even his response to this complaint is similar to what SoniaKovind said here when I gave him a warning. He had earlier given me a false warning, and then I gave him a legitimate warning. He then accused me of giving a counter-warning. And now after I filed a sockpuppet investigation against NineTimes, he has similarly responded by accusing me of giving a counter-complaint. Responding to a complaint by calling it a "counter" is yet another similarity between the two. Maestro2016 (talk) 18:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This is just a countercomplaint in reply to my complaint against Maestro 2016 for creating this puppet account, ThreeTwentyTwo. Why he chose this particular case is beyond me. Maestro 2016 has been engaging in edit wars with me on a couple of pages such as; Bollywood, Padmavati (film), Khalji dynasty, Alauddin Khalji and Film industry, since last couple of days. Then suddenly out of no where on 4 November 2017, this new user ThreeTwentyTwo appeared, with sole agenda of reporting me. All of ThreeTwentyTwo's edits are related to me and is related to the pages mentioned above, where Maestro2016 was engaged in edit wars with me. I really doubt this is a rarest of rare case of coincidence. NineTimes (talk) 07:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this allegation that I would create an account(ThreeTwentyTwo) to report myself for vandalism is laughable at best but then everyone has an imagination. NineTimes (talk) 07:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 February 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Same strange obsession with adding crap about Ravish Kumar's brother to his article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:33, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ben MacDui Per WP:BEANS I didn't want to spell it out but: 1, 2. Just one of many examples. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:47, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note I had a look at this and firstly there is no sign of "Ravish Kumar" appearing in the archive so a diff or three would have helped. Secondly, whilst it is true that 100% of the alleged sock's edits are suspicious - and forgive me if I am wrong about this - I think it would be unusual to block someone on behavioural grounds after a single edit. If they start editing again please feel free to ping me. Ben MacDui 19:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

18 August 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

SPA, recreating near-identical Battle of Gajendragad from redirect, along with overlapping edits at Maratha–Mysore Wars. Wikishovel (talk) 17:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

More