Princepratap1234 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• 2409:4063:4e8d:9534:237d:5488:5b1d:3edd (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 110.226.106.78 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 122.163.196.28 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2409:4063:4e8d:9534:8b5:9d5a:3132:cfe1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2409:4063:4e8d:9534:1b21:7141:46f4:91eb (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 106.203.225.229 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] The user Princepratap1234 used to harass me through different IPs. As everyone can see, it's more than the evidence that both Sock Master and IPs used same language and same type of heading for any new discussion. Even a user Manali Jain who warned me against him by pointing out both of them's location to be same and asked me to Remove some personal info from my user page. And after that he lost cool and started blaming Manali. Even I have provided link to one of IPs talk page. Where Manali warned him and he rudely answered her. He always begins new discussion either with "Hi" or "Hey" . So do sockpuppets. I was keeping calm since long. And I often creates talk page of new editors. However I doesn't know how a new user at Paras Kalnawat's deletion discussion page copied my comment in favour of keep it. And the accused booked me for sockpuppetry of that new user. Even after knowing I warned some users previously not to copy my text. And when I warned this accused user that I'll file case against him on the basis of evidences present on my talk page, he rudely answered me by losing his cool. He misbehaved with ManaliJain in the similar way by using his IPs.Pri2000 (talk) 10:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This investigation is opened just because she is suspected sock and she threatened me too [24].Princepratap1234 (talk) 10:37, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• No. Administrators can clearly see the similarities between all IPs and his language and way of starting a conversation. I never accuses anybody for no reason. You can see my defence comment in my case and the warning I issued to that new user also[25]. And the accused is now baffled because I've solid proofs against him in my talk page.Pri2000 (talk) 10:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pri2000, Yes they can see the similarities between your vote and your sock vote.Princepratap1234 (talk) 10:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Princepratap1234 and they can see the warning which I issued to that new userPri2000 (talk) 10:52, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pri2000, After Getting caught , anyone can fake things like that.Princepratap1234 (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Princepratap1234: oh really! I clearly said in my defence that they are free to see my editing history from 24 June 2021 till now. Which is evidence that I'm not that type of person. I even mentioned about that Tajmashaik who exactly copied text from my user page. Think about you. How you misbehaved with me through different IPs. And how you misbehaves with other editors. Manali Jain was right. You harrasses someone to the extent that they decide to quitPri2000 (talk) 10:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• All the confusion happened due to Krishika Sahni 's sock Gari897. As the editor suspected that I'm the sockmaster of Gari897. And through my continuous harrasment and way of starting of conversation I thought that he's the sockmaster. Now all the confusion has been cleared. Now the editor and I've figured out that it's Krishika Sahni who came with new account Gari897. So please remove the editor from this case. He's innocent.Pri2000 (talk) 15:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir see how this user through new IP is harassing me badly on my Wikimedia talk pagePri2000 (talk) 15:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No comment on these particular IPs, but I can confirm that Princepratap1234 has been logging out to leave abusive messages at multiple users' talk pages, under a range of different IPs. I don't see any other accounts that would allow me to link them to any existing cases. I've CU blocked the account; these particular IPs can be looked at by someone else behaviourally, and dealt with as necessary. Girth Summit _(blether) 15:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• None of the unblocked IPs has edited recently. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Pri2000: The IP that you added has no edits on enwiki. We cannot do anything about it here - the issue has to be handled by Commons admins. Please do not reopen a SPI case after it has been closed. Closing again. Spicy (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]