Shakib Mama Family

Shakib Mama Family (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

15 December 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Yet another sock... this time an "official" one. Please check for sleepers. UtherSRG (talk) 11:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

17 December 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

All CUblocked on Commons (some are blocked here), and continuing to complain here. Some are blocked, but the unblocked ones should be blocked. And tagging would be helpful for this cross-wiki case IMO. Requesting CU in case a sleeper check for enwiki-only accounts or an enwiki CU record is desirable, but I recognize this may not be needed :). — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw the prior request. I think that an enwiki CU could be helpful for an underlying IP block, preventing further account creations/attachments. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Commons CU comment: While Shakib Mama Family is stale, I've used it as the master per the block rationale for AnikaAfrin of "Self-admitted block evasion by User:Shakib Mama Family", which presumably relates to this admission. All accounts, save stale Shakib Mama Family, are, as noted, confirmed on Commons; data are here. See username similarity and, for disparate username KingSakil, compare userpages (KingSakil, AnikaAfrinBD). Эlcobbola talk 16:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
More