They appear to be Likely to the master. Bagging and tagging all accounts. This SPI can be closed... ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 03:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SuperBassProShops is already blocked, but AtlanticBlueFinProShops and others were created within the last 48 hours, and all are vandalising Bass Pro Shops. [1][2][3][4]. I know this could go to AIV but they've opened up three accounts in the last day. SPF121188(talk this way)(contribs) 15:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What a thoroughly weird thing to sock about. SuperBassProShops and AtlanticBlueFinProShops are Confirmed to each other, and exceedingly Likely to BassProShopsTruex. That + behaviour means I have no problem calling the lot effectively confirmed and tagging as such. No sleepers that I could see, but given the range situation here I didn't look very hard. firefly ( t · c ) 15:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
places Douglas bond of doom in edits, as per other socks of Douglas bond of doom (see here(diff) and here(diff)) Wesoree (Talk) 14:45, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This account and previous batch were glocked by Hasley as UnderArmorKid, and there's this. I'm not sure if the whole case is the same master, or some LTA copycat. Closing the case, but maybe someone familiar with UAK can assess if they should be merged. MarioGom (talk) 23:58, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See contributions, aligned with LTA topics. Only the last listed account is not blocked already, is weak alignment with the usual, but asking for CU anyway. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See contributions aligned with SPA topics. Explicit reference to UAK [13]. Account unblocked as of time of filing. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In general, this SPI page should only be used for sleeper accounts or accounts that engage in more subtle vandalism. Blatant WP:VOAs like this should be reported to WP:AIV instead. Partofthemachine (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's one opinion, and of course they can be reported at AIV. Sometimes checkusers should be casting an eye over the accounts, to block sleepers and ranges, and to clean up IP edits. My usual advice with this type of LTA is that you ensure that you see that a checkuser is in the loop somewhere along the line. -- zzuuzz(talk) 06:53, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Only the first account listed above is not blocked; it has not edited and might be a sleeper, being created the same day as HurricanePatriciaArmour. Note [14] on heels of what I think is the latest blocked sockpuppet at the same article. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:58, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The first account is unrelated. The other two, along with some unlisted recent blocked others, are confirmed. -- zzuuzz(talk) 21:11, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Two accounts have made identical vandalism here and here. ArgentinaAndTokio is 99.9% UAK sock based on topics edited — 9/11, UnderA, named weather event, etc.
Accounts created under 5 minutes apart. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Filed per zzuzz's request to ensure that you see that a checkuser is in the loop somewhere – yes, these accounts are blocked. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think we're all up to date (confirmed, btw). UAK is straddling some relatively large ranges at this time. -- zzuuzz(talk) 17:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See contributions, LTA profile, username convention (GD = Geometry Dash has been used before by this sockmaster). Two listed accounts have not been blocked, probably not yet recognized as UAK sock, nor is the IP blocked. Opening case for CU as requested. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Despite the CU findings, it looks like MaterialNS93 is aware of the UAK persona at least [15]. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The first seven listed accounts are all Confirmed to one another, and are already all blocked (as is the listed IP). MaterialNS93 is also already blocked, and is Confirmed to SantiagoMetro1650, NS93 2074 and YABACAN2074. I'm requesting locks on all the unlocked accounts. Closing. GirthSummit (blether) 17:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
LTA signature; has returned to same topics (cyclones, hornets, etc.) as last incident. See editing. Reported at AIV but not yet blocked. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonus: a blocked account that matches LTA but maybe was not recognized before and an IP that the blocked account referred to in an edit [16], and also matches LTA signature. There are other possible edits by same actor on the 190.208 range. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe coincidence, but IP1902808 was created within 10 minutes of confirmed sock AppleCat2001. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See contributions matching LTA topics: cyclones, NASCAR, video games etc. All blocked; CU requested for sleepers.
If you need a diff for justification, compare [17] and [18] -- vandalism to same two fields of an infobox on the same article, as a confirmed sock ~60 days ago (see archive for 29 June 2023). ☆ Bri (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC
The three named accounts are confirmed, but No sleepers immediately visible. Global lock(s) requested. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 22:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See contributions; LTA topics = Nintendo, Chile mass transit, hurricanes. Aware of their own IP block (190.208.45.244, Chile) [19] and another LTA IP (1.202.125.132, 2014, proxy?) [20] ☆ Bri (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Usual LTA subjects and behavior. Requesting check for sleepers. The IP edits seem to refer to the new sock name [21]. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Behavior LTA match editing same group of pages, plus one account is self declared UAK sock [22]. There's also an IP sort of declaring itself to be NoobasGD (poss. logged out editing) [23].
Filed per zzuzz's request to ensure that you see that a checkuser is in the loop somewhere. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz: added CrankeyGD late, account created 9 September, no edits. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per usual LTA subjects and methods. Continuation of vandalism a few days ago by confirmed sock, to same page, same infobox, same field(s) [24]. Second listed account, similarly returning to page vandalized a few days ago by this sockfarm [25] and appears to be aware of UAK IP block [26]. Third listed account has edited on es.wiki in a topic mentioned on the LTA casepage [27] ☆ Bri (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Chile IP, cyclone article vandalism, matches LTA topics and ISP Claro. Named accounts also edited same eclipse article and obvs naming connection. Several accounts linked to IP through this. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The accounts are all blocked already; I've tagged as suspected, requested locks, and am blocking the two IPs for a week. GirthSummit (blether) 16:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now it is certain – vandalism by first reported account was followed by Claro IP and DarkestArmour2023 [31] ☆ Bri (talk) 14:38, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
VAO nonsense - all blocked. No other accounts. Closing. GirthSummit (blether) 20:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk assistance requested: - could a clerk more competent than myself with merging cases somehow blend this into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Douglas bond of doom? There was a duplicate report, and this one has more information than the one which is currently at the correct title. Tag as you see fit - the three accounts are confirmed to each other. GirthSummit (blether) 20:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
First: evidence linking blocked accounts to UAK. Although they are blocked, the connection to this LTA has not been noted as far as I can see.
The blocked accounts all follow the LTA habits, especially rapid vandalism on a particular Nascar driver's bio [33][34][35]. The recent edit history of the same page includes CU-confirmed socks.
Vandalism on cyclone articles is a LTA signature. This quarter has seen a visit here from the CU confirmed sock [36] and many accounts noted in this case [37][38][39][40]
Another cyclone page, the third-to-last edit on one of these was vandalism by UAK confirmed sock [41], followed by revert of same followed by an account listed here [42].
One of the blocked accounts listed here has referenced UAK [43].
A dozen of the UAK CU-confirmed socks also use "Super" as a username prefix.
Spanish usernames and editing interests concerning Latin America [44] fit LTA profile
Now how is the unblocked account linked to the others listed here? The first listed account is unblocked and has only made one edit. I think it's connected to the very evident group of UAK socks who were recently blocked but not tagged.
The unblocked account has reinstated vandalism of one of the others, about one minute after the vandalism was reverted [46][47].
one of the others said in their vandalismI'm a horse from CMDX.
which are yet to be blocked, and a plethora of other accounts which are already blocked as VOAs. Blocked without tags, Global lock(s) requested. Closing. DatGuyTalkContribs 14:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, all have been blocked as vandals. LTA signature Nascar, Office Depot, 9/11, cyclones [64], and in at least one case, more than one simultaneously [65][66][67]. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]