WhenDatHotlineBling

WhenDatHotlineBling (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

10 May 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Drmies (talk) 04:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Already blocked after obvious similarities confirmed by CU. Filing this because I later discovered ImmaBeeBe. Drmies (talk) 04:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


30 May 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Noticed similar vandalism on Squidward Tentacles, Chef (South Park), etc. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. User is currently only temporarily blocked. Sro23 (talk) 03:00, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

19 June 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Similar usernames (see also previous socks such as MmmMcGriddles and ILoveKrabbyBurgers, currently tagged as socks of StewieRox, but StewieRox was a sock of IBB...) and similar edits to a similar range of articles:

Note After opening this report I discovered WhenDatHotlineBling who was blocked back in November (but posted several unblock requests in April). I'm sure this is the same user and am adding it to the list of suspected socks above. One reason is StewieRox copying WhenDatHotlineBling's unblock request; their talk page posts, especially unblock requests, are also very similar to those of other blocked socks. Examples: ImmaBeeBe, WhenDatHotlineBling (that's the one the StewieRox sock copied), KlausSmithHeissler. Before WhenDatHotlineBling was blocked they also edited a similar range of pages to the other socks, such as McGriddles (also edited by ImmaBeeBe, IWannaRockBro, StewieRox, and KlausSmithHeissler). Assuming it is the same user, WhenDatHotlineBling should be the sockmaster. --bonadea contributions talk 15:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Endorsed for WhenDatHotlineBling (talk · contribs) as well. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18 July 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Like previous accounts, adding inappropriate categories to articles about animated films/TV series - in particular child abuse related categories. [7], [8], [9]. The focus on The Simpsons, Family Guy, and South Park is consistent with previous socks. Political views of Adolf Hitler is another article that's been edited by this and older socks: [10], [11]. bonadea contributions talk 12:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

02 September 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Quacking on McGriddles ([12] [13]) and Peter Griffin ([14] [15]) Sro23 (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.


11 September 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Probably some other known troll, but don't have the diffs for that.

DUCK based on names though EvergreenFir (talk) 18:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diff for IP: [16] [17]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

I'm pretty sure I've seen this editor before, but I don't remember who it was. Anyway, everyone is already blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


01 October 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

WP:DUCK. Same as usual, adding articles to "child abuse" categories etc. Also this, cf this. The user name is also typical. bonadea contributions talk 12:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

02 October 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Much like previous socks of his, this user has a tendency to add non-defining/inappropriate categories to animation-related articles, especially categories that have to do with child abuse. [18] [19] [20] However, I do not see a restrictive focus on a certain subject with this user; there appears to be a variety in his contributions, whereas WhenDatHotlineBling and his socks would stick to one or two subjects and very rarely had variety. I'd say they are the same person based on their edits to animation-related articles, though. Oldnick34 (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

06 October 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Obsessed with the same set of articles, adding nonsensical child abuse/pornography categories, and writing in the exact same voice as previous socks. The only peculiarity is the age of this account, but maybe it has switched owners or something - there was a three-year gap until a few days ago, and the current user is clearly identical to WhenDatHotlineBling. bonadea contributions talk 20:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.


21 March 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same articles, unmistakeable writing style, and much of the same nonsense (as usual interspersed with more or less constructive edits) ; the user name is characteristic, and now they are also trying to immemorialise their own vandalism and disruption - [21] and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/WhenDatHotlineBling bonadea contributions talk 08:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

12 April 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Using identical phrasing, editing the identical subject areas including some specific articles that are clearly their favourites, mixing semi-constructive edits with useless and disruptive ones - obvious sock. bonadea contributions talk 04:34, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Just as a FTR, a couple of other obvious socks have been blocked for disruptive editing (not blocked as socks) recently: DrakeFan373 (talk · contribs) a week ago and YouTheYouTheBest (talk · contribs) today. There is a clear overlap in the edits, behaviour and language of these two accounts with each other and with OneDance1 and previous socks. I can provide diffs if needed but to me it looks like a whole row of ducklings. --bonadea contributions talk 06:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

14 April 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

WP:DUCK, behaviour and username. bonadea contributions talk 07:54, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

18 May 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Focused on the same groups of pages as all the other socks (including articles about characters from animated TV series, fast food, and songs by the rapper Drake), and the user name is characteristic. bonadea contributions talk 10:57, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

25 May 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Various telltale signs including (but not limited to) the usual range of subjects, a mixture of fairly constructive edits with puerile trolling/vandalism, and this, cf for instance this. bonadea contributions talk 09:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

29 May 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Obvious ducking, vandalism on articles related to fast food, a mixture of constructive/trolling/vandalism edits, and editing on articles where the previous socks also edited in. theinstantmatrix (talk) 06:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

02 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Focuses on the same articles, uses the same style, and then there is this. bonadea contributions talk 07:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding SpongeBobDrakeFamilyGuySimpsonsSouthParkFastFood whose user name shows a pathetic eagerness to be noticed and blocked. They tend to create one or more new socks as soon as a SPI is created - any chance of a rangeblock of underlying IPs? --bonadea contributions talk 07:39, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And IWillRevertVandlism. --bonadea contributions talk 07:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

02 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Walks, talks, and edits like a duck. bonadea contributions talk 21:01, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Closing per report above.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]



04 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

This is a giveaway, and there's also the usual fixation on minor pointless formatting changes, adding or removing piped links, and adding or removing categories, within their favourite topic areas. bonadea contributions talk 08:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Esther2001 - more of the same, including the restoration of a disruptive edit by BaconSandwich2 [24]. Created after this SPI was started, as per their usual approach. --bonadea contributions talk 08:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I'm here to defend myself against this accusation. This user whom the SPI is a about appears to be male; I on the other hand am a female, and I only restored that edit because it looked to be accurate; the image for the Happy Meal article shows the Japanese version of the meal rather than the recognizable American one. That said, I can safely pass over the speculation that I have any affiliation with this user. Esther2001 (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Why do you assume that the sockmaster is male? But thank you for providing more evidence that you are the same person - your writing style is quite distinctive. --bonadea contributions talk 09:05, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

05 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Similar format with username and new account starting to make trivial edits. See User:McShittlesIsMyMiddleName and this edit (McShittles). -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 03:42, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


05 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same nonsense speedy deletion rationales and similar edit summaries. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

13 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Quack. bonadea contributions talk 04:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


17 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

WP:DUCK. C.f. edits of recently blocked sock Chizteen. General Ization Talk 00:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Sro23 -  Done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


18 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Another duck in the pond. Editing the same articles, doing the same semi-constructive, semi-pointless stuff. bonadea contributions talk 07:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Just because a user joins and suddenly makes constructive edits does not mean they are a sockpuppet. Just because said user edits articles related to Family Guy, South Park, SpongeBob, The Simpsons, songs by the rapper Drake, and fast food, does not automatically make them a sock either. Where are people's standards? This seems like a guessing game. MonkeyBacon2 (talk) 07:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

21 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same pattern as all the others: articles, writing style, etc. bonadea contributions talk 05:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WordSaladUsername seems to be another one. [edited to add: that account has been blocked as WP:NOTHERE.] --bonadea contributions talk 06:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

30 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same obsession with Spongebob, McMuffin, and Family Guy as WordSaladUsername HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:49, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added Syrupygriddle although it's a clear WP:DUCK HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Add ButtersCartman, who does the same thing. ---bonadea contributions talk 22:25, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. That quacks. Is there anything we can do to put him off? Would a rangeblock or an edit filter help? Also, I think we need some these edits revdeled due to the extremely offensive edit summaries. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


01 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

 Looks like a duck to me based upon recent actions, particularly on McMuffin. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


02 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Pretty obvious Duck. [25]. Also recreated Draft:McShittles. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:39, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


02 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same pattern as always, and identical tone of (written) voice. bonadea contributions talk 22:05, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


03 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same, same, same. Now with added trolling/PAs. bonadea contributions talk 10:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


04 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Obvious DUCK HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding child abuse category to a South Park-related article for no apparent reason here, usernames are both Hotline Bling references. Not super familiar with this sock case so correct me if I'm wrong Aspening (talk) 04:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have added Goodgravey to the above list. Likely sock. Making edits to Family Guy and South Park and their name is food related. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Adding Yazmiener who edits the same articles doing the same from-pointless-to-unconstructive edits. A previous sock also tried to pretend to be a sock of a different sockmaster, and this is another instance of that. --bonadea contributions talk 06:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

04 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

The usual disruption, including adding irrelevant categories to articles. bonadea contributions talk 21:41, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


05 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Likely sock. Brand new editor editing similar pages to past socks such as Butters Stotch and recently blocked Hottydoggy. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:00, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


07 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Obvious duck. Editing Butters Stotch, McDonalds related pages and insulting me here. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:03, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I'm afraid I agree with Sro23 below - this is somebody who is desperate for attention, and a LTA would serve to give them that. (Note that there is a certain amount of cross-Wiki vandalism, and several accounts have been globally blocked.) --bonadea contributions talk 10:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


09 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

a lot of overlapping edits but originally, on the surface appear to be good until you look at them...and of course the obvious interest in Spongebob/Simpsons etc... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed. Some others:

-- zzuuzz (talk) 17:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


22 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Similar to previous socks adding categories with the term "fiction"(al) - 1, 2, some older socks - 1, 2. CU to verify. -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 04:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Complete WP:DUCK, first post is proposing a ban of the master. It looks like its been a while since a sleeper check, so I'm requesting CU. Home Lander (talk) 01:42, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

02 August 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

[26] WP:DUCK Seeing as I've come across two within 5 minutes I think a checkuser should check for sleepers. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

07 September 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Likely a goodhand account. Brand new editor but can already cite WP:OVERLINK and is editing South Park related articles HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

05 October 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Admitted as a sockpuppet on his userpage Abote2 (talk) 10:46, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

19 October 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Quack,Quack. Diffs - [[27]] IanDBeacon (talk) 14:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Apropos nothing, I don't see the necessity in notifying ~LTAs. ——SerialNumber54129 14:59, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Serial Number 54129: An LTA page for User:WhenDatHotlineBling doesn't exist yet. --IanDBeacon (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Hence, "~LTA" (linked, in case you miss it—it's a little small). ——SerialNumber54129 15:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponyo:—your link!  :) ——SerialNumber54129 16:32, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

15 November 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

 Looks like a duck to me - vandalism on Kyle Broflovski. CU might reveal sleepers. Bellezzasolo Discuss 13:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

21 November 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

User:Creationmunga - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Creationmunga&oldid=869980008 Worth checking for sleepers? Bellezzasolo Discuss 16:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

18 August 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]
Hell in a Bucket (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

19 September 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Food-related name, claiming to not be a sock of Fast Food Nazi Vandal after they created an LTA for the account of the same exact name[28] (good hand, bad hand). All the signs are here. It's got webbed-feet, a yellow bill, and lives near ponds. Lupin VII (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

For the record, this is not WDHB, but is almost certainly My Royal Young. Nothing more to do here. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


05 December 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

See contribs. This one is definitely a duck. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

This is My Royal Young doing impersonation again. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


27 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


WP:Duck. Same focus on short descriptions, adolescent, and child sexual abuse topics. I usually report this one to Berean Hunter. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 02:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Compare, for example, to TwelvePerson, one of the various WhenDatHotlineBling socks I reported to Berean Hunter. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 02:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

11 March 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Unless someone is impersonating this sockmaster, Mirvblast is clearly one of his socks. Using "Mirvblast" instead "Nirvblast" this time. Focused on me. Noting the sock here for documentation and to check for sleepers. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ST47, checked already? Checked but not confirmed as a WhenDatHotlineBling sock? I know that editors like to apply WP:Deny to this sockmaster, but documenting his socks helps. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ST47, thanks. Yes, I know from another case, it seems that this sockmaster has started to use colocation hosts/proxies. Looking here, it seems that Berean Hunter was the one to check. Whoever did the check, or if there was more than one check, I understand that there is nothing more to see here. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

04 September 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Made a very similar edit [29] to a suspected sock of the user. [30] The user all of the sudden started making (now RevDeleted) personal attacks on their talk page earlier today after a 3-year dormancy. Goose(Talk!) 23:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Yup. Nothing more to do here. -- zzuuzz (talk) 00:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


08 January 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

A newly created account that seems already quite familiar with Wikipedia, editing in the sockmaster's typical topic areas of child abuse and pop music. Cheers, gnu57 22:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

17 January 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Please see his/her/their contributions. gnu57 06:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

06 November 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same interests as always - age categories and fast food (e.g. [31]) Crossroads -talk- 20:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith - is a one-click mass revert of all his edits possible by admins? Crossroads -talk- 21:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Such things are possible, but it's not my area of expertise, so I'll have to punt to somebody else on that one. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How would I pursue this? Crossroads -talk- 21:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

05 December 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same fixation towards animation and laws regarding adolescents. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/LiminalSpaceship Schwarbage (talk) 11:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

15 January 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Familiar obsession with adolescent/child development stages and history of absurd/nonsensical edits. Interest in Japanese culture and child murder, all of his edits have something to do with this, including his most recent in November. History of edit spam and removing bits of articles without a good reason or context. Will probably pop up again, so keep a look out. Schwarbage (talk) 22:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

05 November 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same interests as usual. Schwarbage (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]