The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sinéad Quinn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary navbox. One album and two songs (both from the same album), each of which is linkable to and from one another as well as the main topic article. WP:NENAN. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:57, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, textbook WP:NENAN. Surprised Jax 0677 isn't involved this time. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:31, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom; the album and song articles already link to each other and on the artist's main page. Navbox is not particularly useful.  Gongshow ^Talk 16:52, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adi Shakti Peethas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I could not find any references saying that the four mentioned are could Adi Shakti Pithas. WP:OR in Shakti Peetha article. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above contention is right. The last two are Adi Shakthi Pithas but the first two, though Shakthi Pithas, are not listed as the four Adi Shakthi Pithas. Hence, it may be better to rename the template header as "Four Popular Shakthi Pithas" of Eastern and Western India.--Nvvchar. 07:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• delete as OR. Frietjes (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Select skin on page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Select skin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Select skin on page with Template:Select skin.
This template is a fork of Template:Select skin, made this April, and not used at all now. The only difference is that this template takes an argument to specify the page to test skins, replacing all ((FULLPAGENAME)) with (({1|((FULLPAGENAME))))}. (And the lead sentence.) But it can be merged into Template:Select skin, and there's no need for a separate template. Ahora (talk) 11:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. I made Template:Select skin on page. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• * (Related proposal) I'm proposing to delete ((preview skin)) in this page. Ahora (talk) 01:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge all 3 templates, a switch can be used to display optional text, or select a specific skin to show only one skin link -- 70.24.250.26 (talk) 05:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.