The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete - G3, blatant hoax. GiantSnowman 19:40, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Angola Squad 2015 Africa Cup of Nations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Clearly WP:HOAX. Angola didn't even qualify for the Tournament. – Michael (talk) 18:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ben Croshaw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Articles in this navbox are only loosely related. Once the redirects were removed, there was nothing left. Links aren't strong enough to warrant inclusion in each article's See Also sections, so aren't strong enough to warrant a navbox. – czar 17:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I have nothing to add as the nomination statement pretty much nails it dead on. -- Whpq (talk) 13:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Consensus does not appear to have changed with respect to these sidebars. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Audrey Hepburn sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

per Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_February_13#Template:Vidya_Balan. These can simply connected using the "See also" section. Skr15081997 (talk) 05:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per Frietjes. Nymf (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• keep Neater and more prominent than a "See also" section. LynwoodF (talk) 21:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Consensus is that these sort of templates should not be used. See this discussion for one of many TfDs where mass deletions took place. This one was just missed. Nymf (talk) 05:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• keep or merge the three articles. Its one article which has been split in three parts. Christian75 (talk) 13:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Redirect to Oct 19. Primefac (talk) 01:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tracy Hepburn films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An actor and actress were paired in multiple films, but there is no need of a template listing these films. Skr15081997 (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The Tracy-Hepburn collaboration encompasses nine films and may be, arguably, considered the most enduringly legendary male-female partnership in film history. There is nothing, anywhere else within Wikipedia, which provides such easy accessibility to this joint filmography. I invite anyone to visit the Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn biographical entries and, even more to the point, the separate Spencer Tracy filmography and Katharine Hepburn performances articles which, while comprehensive and detailed, do not highlight their nine-film collaboration and require the uninitiated to search the casts of entire filmographies to even determine which are their joint titles and how each title correlates to the other in terms of the time period between them. This navbox is the sole space within Wikipedia where the nine titles are displayed for easy perusal and instant navigation from one to the other, and such ease of access is what Wikipedia should represent. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 07:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It should be also noted that on May 1, less than 5 months before this template was again submitted for deletion, its previous deletion discussion (Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 May 1#Template:Tracy Hepburn films) was closed as No consensus to delete. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 08:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Consensus does not appear to have changed with respect to these sidebars. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Katharine Hepburn sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Katharine Hepburn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Katharine Hepburn sidebar with Template:Katharine Hepburn.
We already have Template:Katharine Hepburn. Either both of these should be merged or the sidebar should be deleted. Skr15081997 (talk) 05:09, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete the sidebar. Frietjes (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• keep both One is near the top, the other is near the bottom. They serve different purposes. LynwoodF (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the sidebar per old consensus and precedent. Nymf (talk) 05:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge the choice between sidebar and footer should be a template parameter switch, to let editors choose -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by Guerillero after clerks-l thread. (non-admin closure) L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ACAmotion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused JMHamo (talk) 02:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - This template is used by the Arbitration Commitee, so they should be notified at their noticeboard. I have done so for you. --TL22 (talk) 13:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).