The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tfd-mbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-helpful tfd notice that should be incorporated as a possible value for the |type= parameter in ((tfd)) if kept. Pppery 23:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:DNA2016riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template only used once, in List of 2016 UCI Women's Teams and riders. Text can be transcluded there. The Banner talk 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep template used twice at the moment. Part of a series of Cycling team templates. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 07:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • So, you suggest that I nominate all the templates of this text-only templates? I have only nominated the ones with link to disambiguation pages, but I am willing to nominate the whole series. The argument "part of a series" is contrary to the mantra "every article (in this case template) is judged on its own merits". The Banner talk 12:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    They're in the same vein as the templates used for other squads, such as the ones that make up the Football at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads article, for example. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 12:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Sander. These templates are part of a bigger established series. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• keep for now, and merge/delete once the season is over. going forward, it would probably be good to use Help:LST to avoid the need to create all these single-season rider list templates, but still have the benefit of having the information in one place. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:GPC2013riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:GPC2014riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:OGE2016riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template only used once, in List of 2016 UCI Women's Teams and riders. Text can be transcluded there. The Banner talk 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep template used twice at the moment. Part of a series of Cycling team templates. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 07:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Sander. These templates are part of a bigger established series. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• keep for now, and merge/delete once the season is over. going forward, it would probably be good to use Help:LST to avoid the need to create all these single-season rider list templates, but still have the benefit of having the information in one place. Frietjes (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:OPW2014riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PAC2016riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template only used once, in List of 2016 UCI Women's Teams and riders. Text can be transcluded there. The Banner talk 22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep template used twice at the moment. Part of a series of Cycling team templates. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 07:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Sander. These templates are part of a bigger established series. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• keep for now, and merge/delete once the season is over. going forward, it would probably be good to use Help:LST to avoid the need to create all these single-season rider list templates, but still have the benefit of having the information in one place. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:TIB2014riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:TPO2013riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:UHC2016riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template only used once, in List of 2016 UCI Women's Teams and riders. Text can be transcluded there. The Banner talk 22:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep template used twice at the moment. Part of a series of Cycling team templates. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 07:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Sander. These templates are part of a bigger established series. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• keep for now, and merge/delete once the season is over. going forward, it would probably be good to use Help:LST to avoid the need to create all these single-season rider list templates, but still have the benefit of having the information in one place. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:U-boat War Badge with Diamonds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template comparable to recently deleted template "Combined Pilots-Observation Badge with Diamonds"; pls see TfD discussion.

The article U-boat War Badge lists the recipients of the Diamond award and is sufficient. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Playmates of 1961 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation templates are supposed to help you navigate between multiple articles. This template effectively gives you a choice between Christa Speck and List of Playboy Playmates of 1961 (11x). In this state superfluous. The Banner talk 11:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative to removal: remove the links to the playmates, leaving only the part the links to the "List of Playboy Playmates of ...". The Banner talk 18:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural keep. We really need to be looking at all of these similar templates, of which there are many. I think they should all be merged to one template, which only contains the different year articles, but I'd prefer a single mass-nomination to handle that. Would you be good with that, The Banner? ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural delete See below // Original comment -- yes, others are questionable too, but that's not a reason to keep this one. Most of the links in the templates are not to individual articles, but instead are to monthly sections of annual collection of playmates. The list article themselves look like fancruft, with such intricate detail as Hips/Bust/Waist measurements. By looking at this as a test case, that's a delete for me. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @K.e.coffman: The reason I want these considered together is because we've had many cases at TfD and CfD where things are brought up at separate times and get two different outcomes. This often happens when different groups of editors happen to show up to the second related discussion. When that happens, we're left with a situation where, for instance, this 1961 template is deleted but all the others are kept. I think it's obvious that's the worst possible outcome, since it doesn't please either side and is horribly inconsistent. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural keep (in view of above) but implement the nom's suggestion to "remove the links to the playmates, leaving only the part the links to the "List of Playboy Playmates of ...". 07:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)K.e.coffman (talk)
• Comment K.e.coffman, that basically leaves you with ((Playboy Playmates by year)), so you're effectively saying that you want to delete the nominated template and replace it with this one. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose this is also relevant to BU Rob13 - thoughts? Primefac (talk) 00:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• keep since we aren't considering the entire series. Frietjes (talk) 13:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 5 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Calendar, clock, date and time computing templates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cypriot Third Division (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unsourced and not part of the highest level of football. As well as every page in the "seasons". Pyrusca (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I have added sources to all seasons. Some of them already had. Cypriot Third Division is the third national level of Cypriot football league system. Just remember that for English football league system we have articles for 8th and 10th level 2016–17 Northern Premier League and 2016–17 West Midlands (Regional) League Premier Division. Xaris333 (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Cypriot Third Division is one of the three main divisions of the Cypriot football which are organized by Cyprus Football Association. It is not a regional league competition to be considered as not significant. It is the 3rd highest league of the country, and teams from all around Cyprus are participating. That level of competitions i believe that are matching wikipedia rules, and as i know many similar articles (for other countries football competitions) already exist without any of them to be proposed for deletion. Also, since sources were added to all Cypriot Third Division "seasons" articles, i believe that the articles are OK and complete, so there is no any reason now to be deleted. Marios26 (talk) 17:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Bundesheer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template that is very similar and / or a subset of the template recently deleted at TfD: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_11#Template:Knight.27s_Cross_recipients_in_the_Bundeswehr_and_Bundesgrenzschutz. Should be likewise deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete an intersection of two categories that isn't useful to the encyclopedia. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, again, I am sure it was made in good faith, but with that said, delete, per above reasoning stated, being a "unnecessary concoction". Kierzek (talk) 15:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cork NHL Team 1972 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

content is an exact copy of ((Cork NHL Team 1974)), including the title. Frietjes (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- perhaps created in error? K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Sepahanmainkit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SepahanFCkit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not useful. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Semi Finals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Secondary Schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

provides little navigation. Frietjes (talk) 17:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- templates are supposed to be for navigation, not for decoration. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Sidebar Entertainment industry in Puerto Rico (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no parent article. Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 5 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Semi-wikibreak (simple) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Semi-wikibreak (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).