The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Televisión de la Frontera, S.A. de C.V. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template links a bunch of non-notable red links about local television programs in Ciudad Juárez with an article, a redirect to said article, and another article. It doesn't need to exist. Raymie (t • c) 23:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:C.S. Visé squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

On 28 October 2014, the club was declared bankrupt. Kq-hit (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Also dissolved and also not playing in a fully pro league and also most of the players aren't notable to have a page. --SuperJew (talk) 17:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, defunct. Frietjes (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:R.A.E.C. Mons squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The club declared bankruptcy on 16 February 2015. Kq-hit (talk) 21:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not an active team --SuperJew (talk) 17:31, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, defunct. Frietjes (talk) 14:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Diyarbakırspor squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Club dissolved 9 August 2013 Kq-hit (talk) 20:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not current team. --SuperJew (talk) 17:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, defunct. Frietjes (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Altay S.K. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Club plays in the 4th tier of Turkish football which is non-professional and does not have notable players anymore. Kq-hit (talk) 20:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No notable footballers in the template, so not needed, as template is meant to guide between Wiki articles. Joseph2302 22:30, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as they don't play in a fully pro league. --SuperJew (talk) 17:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 September 19. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:ArbComBlock (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NCL T20 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only existed for one year, and hence, the navbox connects only two articles (1) the 2010 season article and (2) the list of records article. Frietjes (talk) 20:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Colevel/count things (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

interesting idea, but not in use, and way too high of a parser function complexity to be used. if you need this sort of thing, you should write it in LUA. Frietjes (talk) 19:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 20 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Navbox prehistoric caves (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Move to userspace of creator ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User-page sacrifice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Should be moved to userspace, but there is also a subpage Template:User-page sacrifice/doc Marvellous Spider-Man 13:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• move to userspace, not commonly used. Frietjes (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Helen Janning Guthrie (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a proper template Marvellous Spider-Man 13:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• G6 deleted. "Deleting pages unambiguously created in error or in the incorrect namespace" is the relevant chunk of WP:G6. It was used only once, in the userspace of its creator, so I substituted it and then deleted the template. Nyttend (talk) 14:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to article space, merge with the sandbox, and delete the redirect from template space. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Director theater (personnality) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Promotional, His name is mentioned Marvellous Spider-Man 13:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• speedy delete, clearly a test page created when User:Parmeline41/sandbox was created and used a non-existing infobox. Frietjes (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. Clearly meant to be an article; I have moved it to Gaëtan Vassart. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Pigsonthewing, you still need to history merge User:Parmeline41/sandbox, so it would be better to have an admin do the history merge and close this. Frietjes (talk) 13:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2016OlympicsSynchronizedSwimmingSchedule (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No pages link to this and similar to Template:2016OlympicSynchronizedSwimmingSchedule Marvellous Spider-Man 13:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Softwear Engeneer (Education ) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template Marvellous Spider-Man 13:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, probably an editing test. Frietjes (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the template linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User No Brexit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Shouldn't this be moved to userspace? Marvellous Spider-Man 13:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Moved to User:Dean the Cool Machine/User No Brexit, in line with the German solution. Political userboxes don't belong in templatespace. Someone else please speedy-close this section. Nyttend (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• PS, Marvellous Spider-Man, userboxes of all sorts are supposed to go to WP:MFD. Nyttend (talk) 15:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite NRO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:55, 8 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

• Keep unless demonstrated that the resources at The National Archives (United Kingdom) aren't likely to be cited. Uanfala (talk) 18:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are other, better templates with which to do that; not least ((UK National Archives ID)). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:41, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for finding that template. It is for formatting external links, unlike the one under discussion, which is for citations. Are there any other templates that do that? Uanfala (talk) 20:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • It is for both. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • That's not what its documentation says and I can't see a sensible way of trying to merge this function into it. Uanfala (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
          • Documentation can be fixed (bedsides, if that were the criteria, the nominated template has none). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
            • I see that you've now changed ((UK National Archives ID)) to use ((cite web)). Leaving aside the question of whether it's desirable to use citation templates for formatting entries in "External links" sections, there's one way this is problematic. From what I've now seen at the website (and please correct if I'm wrong) the links that ((UK National Archives ID)) produces are to bundles of resources (e.g. "All resources about Orwell") (which is precisely what we'd want in an "external links" section) rather than to individual resources (e.g. a specific manuscript), which is what we'd want to point to when citing. Uanfala (talk) 22:48, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The evidence that this isn't likely to be used is obvious here. It was created in May 2015. It is transcluded on only one page. End of argument. Perhaps the National Archives could be cited elsewhere, but editors seem to have no desire to use this template to do so, as they haven't used it more than once in over a year. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 20 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite within (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite terms (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• This template provides a link to a Baidu dictionary lookup. Whether this is useful depends on how reliable (or stable enough to be citeable) Baidu's dictionary is. I'd imagine it isn't, at least not more than ((cite google translate)). Uanfala (talk) 17:57, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 20 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite-WCED (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to sandbox. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite SEP/old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• @Pigsonthewing: This looks to me (based on edit summaries) like a sandbox, and I'm hesitant to delete in case there's any underlying attribution issues I'm not seeing. Template:Cite SEP/sandbox doesn't exist. Any objection to just moving it there? ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:20, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @BU Rob13: None; though I suggest doing so without a redirect. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:20, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Saudi Arabia squad 2016 AFC U-23 Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

previous precedent set for not having squad templates for youth tournaments Joeykai (talk) 07:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 11:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, we do not need youth squad templates. GiantSnowman 11:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete youth squad templates are not notable per long-standing consensus. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 16:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Scouting uniform (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox WorldScouting (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Scouting uniform with Template:Infobox WorldScouting.
uniform should be an automatic part of the WorldScouting template, like sports uniforms are for their teams. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment You did not add tfd tags to either of these templates. Pppery 11:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added the tag to the talkpage as Template:Infobox WorldScouting is protected.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - However, this would require the assistance of a template editor since Template:Infobox WorldScouting is protected. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 11:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Makes sense. ~ Ablaze (talk) 13:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Just want to note that there is only a few (4) transclusion, which 4 is not an article. NgYShung ^huh? 16:59, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).