The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WV Media (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nexstar Media Group has completed its acquisition of West Virginia Media Holdings on January 31. All the WVMH stations are listed on the Nexstar templates, and the spun-off of its weekly publication The State Journal was completed two months prior, thus no needing this template since the company is now defunct. Csworldwide1 (talk) 07:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, defunct grouping. Frietjes (talk) 13:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 February 10 Primefac (talk) 00:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BS-Infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Routemap-Infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 February 10 (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Westminster Parsons football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 February 10 (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:CSU–Pueblo ThunderWolves football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 February 10 Primefac (talk) 00:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SharedIPUser (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shared IP Meta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shared IP 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shared IP/Proxy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:FirewallWarning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Look (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-KG-exempt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-IrelandGov (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-ID (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-HungarianGov (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Gottlieb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-GallicaPic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Estonia70 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-DenmarkGov (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-DCGov (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-CroatiaGov (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Croatia-exempt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Colombia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Coa-Estonia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Coa-Latvia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 02:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Fujifilm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Fujifilm photographic films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Fujifilm with Template:Fujifilm photographic films.
Per request at Template talk:Fujifilm by @Mjdestroyerofworlds:make it like Template:Polaroid and Template:Eastman Kodak. wbm1058 (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Support merge to ((Fujifilm))- I support merging this to the template for the corporation. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Support a logical merge. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).