The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Zimbabwe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-BulgarianGov (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Brazil-exempt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-BosnianGov (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-BY-exempt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Azerbaijan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Algeria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-AR-Movie (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-AB-exempt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PD-Tanzania (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused and if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and delete.. Primefac (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)* Template:Meyers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Unneeded template created by banned user with LTA case. Replace all transclusions with ((cleanup|reason=Copy-pasted and translated from public domain German encyclopedia.)) KATMAKROFAN (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• replace/delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 23:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not needed. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NPOVexception (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is no reason there should be exceptions on articles from following WP:NPOV. Unused and undocumented. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 13:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Change to the following version:

and then move to ((cleanup-commentary)) without a redirect. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 22:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as T2. No articles are exempt from WP:NPOV Pppery 02:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment/Clarification: I created the template specifically because Wikipedia:Top 25 Report had blatant POV, slanderous, and hurtful statements (they were hyper-partisan and very offensive, and several editors agreed with me). I was convincingly told that because the page was outside mainspace, NPOV did not apply. However, because many viewers would not know this and think this hyper-partisanship was actually Wikipedia's voice, I created this template and proposed it to be used on the article. --1990'sguy (talk) 13:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete template title is misleading; comments are better directed at talk pages; this template unnecessarily politicises articles. --Tom (LT) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Not notifying the reader of partisian commentary on non-mainspace articles (as in Wikipedia:Top 25 Report) will do more harm. --1990'sguy (talk) 04:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Dave Audé (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Producers and mixers do not get their own navboxes like this. Take away the songs that he only produced and did nothing else on, and you only have two links, thus violating WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Dave Audé has his own discography page, and also had a significant role in at least one mix of each of the four songs listed in the navbox. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the number of links justifies preserving this template for ease of navigation for interested readers. --Tom (LT) 00:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
• Keep – Meets the five criteria listed in the WP:NAVBOX guideline. WP:NENAN is merely an essay. Mojoworker (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).