The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2016–17 NIFL Premier Intermediate League table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and never updated Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, unused, not needed. GiantSnowman 16:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2017 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games medal table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused copy of the table in the article Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep , but feel free to renominate it if it isn't used within the next 6 months Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2017–18 CHA standings (women) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and never updated Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep If you must, but I am planning on updating at season end, for use in the NCAA Div 1. That said, I don't object to deleting for now, if it's really necessary. Bill McKenna (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for now Per above. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2017 The Summit League men's soccer standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and never updated Frietjes (talk) 23:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, unused, not needed. GiantSnowman 16:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2017 NPSL South - Southeast standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; the brackets in the article suffice Frietjes (talk) 23:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, unused, not needed. GiantSnowman 16:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per author approval Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2017 Malaysia FA Cup bracket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; incomplete copy of the bracket in the article Frietjes (talk) 23:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No need. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Created without aware there are no need for such template. Bromalayan (talk) 10:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, unused, not needed. GiantSnowman 16:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Thailand at the 2017 Asian Winter Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Soft delete Asian Winter Games will be held. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Franchises by Konami (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A much better template for this already exists, making this template completely obsolete. Namcokid47 (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Redundant to already existing templates that already display the information better. This one doesn't make any sense conceptually anyways - things like "Hudson Soft are not a "franchise", it's a company they bought. Sergecross73 msg me 21:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Nena. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nena (band) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Nena (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Nena (band) with Template:Nena.
The majority of the links in Template:Nena (band) are in Template:Nena. The duplication can be fixed by removing the band album links from Template:Nena, or simply merging the two navboxes. Frietjes (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose merge - 99 Luftballons, Nena die Band and "Irgendwie, irgendwo, irgendwann" are not contained within ((Nena)). The links to Nena, ?, Feuer und Flamme and Eisbrecher can be removed from ((Nena)) so as not to make ((Nena)) unwieldy. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support merge. Why would you not want other related articles to the same person together. A merge would add benefit inter-connectivity without making the navbox unwieldy. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: the only things that would need to be added to ((Nena)) from ((Nena (band))) are the two compilation albums and the list of band members, so it hardly makes the former navbox unwieldy – it already makes the distinction between the band's albums and Nena's solo albums. "Anyplace, Anywhere, Anytime" is simply the English-language version of "Irgendwie, irgendwo, irgendwann" and both titles direct to the same article, so it doesn't make sense having them in separate navboxes. Richard3120 (talk) 23:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Can be easily handled by a single navbox. --woodensuperman 09:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - considering the relationship between the two is "person" and "person's self-named band", there's no reason for separate templates - they're both tightly connected and the separation between the two can be easily shown visually through formatting in a single template. Neither are so large as to warrant a split either. Sergecross73 msg me 21:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete but feel free to create a redirect if you feel its useful Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Waterford Gaelic football team managers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; duplicates Template:Waterford senior football team managers? Frietjes (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WPS Labelled Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; league is defunct Frietjes (talk) 16:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, unused, not needed. GiantSnowman 16:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WPSLsoutheast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; replaced by other navboxes like Template:WPSL East Mid-Atlantic Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, unused, not needed. GiantSnowman 16:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WPSLsouth (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; replaced by other navboxes like Template:WPSL Sunshine Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, unused, not needed. GiantSnowman 16:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WNBL AIS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL AL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL BB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL BMB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL BS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL CC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL DR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL LT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL P (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL PL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL SF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WNBL TF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Category:WNBL templates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; if needed, can be merged into a single template with a switch statement. Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WCI2011 invite (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WikiConference India 2011 is over and this invite template is no longer needed Frietjes (talk) 16:24, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Viacom International Media Networks Asia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Veteran list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Module:Veteran list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Vertical-center (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Venice Film Festival-Volpi Cup for Best Actress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; duplicates Template:Volpi Cup for Best Actress (could be history merged?) Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Venezuelan election to the Latin American Parliament, 2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and not clear where this could be used Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: could only be used within an article titled 2005 elections to the Latin American Parliament or something similar, and in conjunction with similar templates for the results for all other countries belonging to the Parliament. Template creator hasn't edited Wikipedia in more than ten years, so I think we can assume this template will never be used unless someone creates the above article anytime soon. Richard3120 (talk) 01:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after merging with the article Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:54, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Venezuelan constitutional referendum, 2007 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; should be merged with the article or deleted Frietjes (talk) 16:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC) I agree the file should be merged into the article as there is no need for it a separate entity, it's not being used in any other article. Danrha 17:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danrha (talk • contribs) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 12. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Venezuela_number-one_songs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Venezuela national football team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and the majority of the Venezuelan NFT-specific links are actually section links in the main article Frietjes (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, unused, not needed. GiantSnowman 16:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Vb res start 50 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not needed anymore. --Osplace 17:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No need. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Vancouver Mayoral Election, 2008 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and duplicates the table in the main article Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Valleys of Chitral (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and mostly redlinks or redirects Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:VIA Group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:08, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:VFL stadiums map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and would duplicate Victorian Football League#Map if it were used Frietjes (talk) 16:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No need. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:VFA/VFL Grand Finals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; mostly redlinks or redirects (and the redirects are generally covered by Template:VFA/VFL seasons) Frietjes (talk) 16:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:VABus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:05, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:V8 Supercar Australia Championship Circuits (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Andy Muschietti (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only links two things. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• weak keep, links three articles and filmography shows two more films are in the process of being made. Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NENAN. If other works are made, the template can be remade then. @Frietjes: What if the projects are not made? Why put the cart before the horse, and leave a useless template for something that has no guarantee? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not enough links to warrant a navbox. --woodensuperman 09:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).