- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nom (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 21:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
All of the content in this template already exists in Template:Somali elections; there's no need to have a separate navbox for duplicated content. jp×g 21:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The links on this template should not have been added to ((Somali elections)) (there was even a note in there requesting editors not to add them, which was ignored by the nominator) and have now been removed. There is a longstanding consensus that the national election template series should not include non-public elections, hence why only the two direct elections of the German president is on ((German elections)), only the recent elections for president in the Czech Republic and Turkey (which both introduced direct election in the last decade) are on ((Czech elections)) and ((Turkish elections)) and why no presidential elections are on ((Israeli elections)) or ((Italian elections)). Number 57 21:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw nomination. Upon looking into this a little further, it doesn't seem like it makes sense to specifically nominate this template for deletion (since there's a bunch of them like this, and consensus seems to be in favor of them existing). jp×g 01:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Unnecessary sandboxes
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The reason is mainly the same as last time.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Railway tunnels in Thailand
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 01:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Navbox with only one relevant blue link is not useful. It's quite questionable whether the red links are notable enough to deserve their own articles, but since they've remained that way seven years, it's most likely that this placeholder navbox will not be needed for the foreseeable future. Paul_012 (talk) 12:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Module:Find sources notice
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete, deletion performed by User:Fastily. (non-admin closure) PorkchopGMX (talk • contribs • Merry Christmas!) 02:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unused module implementing template being deleted. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Module author here. For the record, the template in question is Template:Find sources notice, which is being merged into Template:Talk header after this discussion. It seems I never got around to using the module from Template:Find sources notice, so it has never had any transclusions (apart from in the documentation). — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:2020 People's National Party leadership election
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Single-event navbox with minimal links. A link to 2020 People's National Party leadership election should be sufficient. BilCat (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; too few links to make for a useful template of this type. ~EdGl talk 18:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 19. Primefac (talk) 01:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).