Template:Villages in Rohtak district
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 8. Izno (talk) 22:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Villages in Rewari District
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 8. Izno (talk) 22:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Mahants of Baba Mast Nath Math
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 8. Izno (talk) 22:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:ACE2012/Guides/Q
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 8. Izno (talk) 22:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:ACE2010/CC
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 8. Izno (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 8. Izno (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:A-Class notice
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 8. Izno (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:ARBV
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 8. Izno (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:ASU Politehnica Timișoara seasons
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Filled with red links and no mainspace exists for this template to be used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Keep AHN-AH, but delete the others. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All three remain unused for their specific purpose. Not even on the mainspaces for the AH1 and 2 articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:16, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep
((AHN-AH)) and delete the other two. AHN-AH now serves as a translation template for content coming from other wikis that do use that template. –Fredddie™ 00:13, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Make the AHN-AH subst only given that comment from Fredddie and delete the other two. --Izno (talk) 22:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:ANI barnstar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 8. Izno (talk) 22:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:2020 Taiwanese legislative election
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mainspace already uses a different table for the election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:US Alternative Albums
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pages this template relies upon have either been deleted (List of Billboard number-one alternative albums) or don't exist and are unlikely to be created. Template is unused. Liz Read! Talk! 16:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Largest cities of Egypt
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Both are unused and respectively superseded by Cities of Egypt and Egyptian cities templates which have a similar layout and design, and contain the same list of cities as the templates nominated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ((Largest cities of Egypt)) and ((Egypt's largest cities by population)) These templates are redundant to ((Cities of Egypt)) and ((Egyptian cities)).--Catchpoke (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I've been notified of this nomination via my talk page.--Catchpoke (talk) 18:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- And to make things clear, it's over our mutual concerns about these Largest cities of Templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep "Largest cities of Egypt" (for now), and Delete "Egypt's largest cities by population". The "largest city" template set (see a list in the navbox at Template:Largest_cities_of_Germany) is rather widely used on country articles, like at Germany#Demographics. The nomination says "Largest cities of Egypt" is unused, but in fact it is currently used on the Egypt article in this very manner.
- We should have a discussion about substituting all of the "largest city" templates onto the country articles (or maybe turning them into wikitables instead of navboxes?), but there are dozens and dozens of them so the discussion should be combined, instead of the nominations of a handful today. — Goszei (talk) 00:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Goszei, this one is a deletion nomination, not a merger. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- My mistake, I have edited my comment. — Goszei (talk) 00:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a shame that the nominator did not check to see if ((Largest cities of Egypt)) is used.--Catchpoke (talk) 03:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Catchpoke, I did check. It's not used on the cities it lists and the only article it is used on is Egypt. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep ((Largest cities of Egypt)). Two different templates with different purposes. One is used in the middle of articles to showcase lists of cities, and the other is used in articles about cities as a navigational template at the bottom. User:Catchpoke unsuccessfully nominated one of such templates a month ago already. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 02:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Largest cities in Egypt, which is in use on the Egypt article. This is similar to the recently closed Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 May 17#Template:Largest cities of Israel, in which it was discussed that the "Largest cities of X" templates are not intended for use as end-article navboxes, but as in-article content. The two templates here are unrelated in purpose and use. The coding of the Largest Cities in X templates through navbox code is problematic, but this would be best covered as a whole rather than in individual nominations such as the Israel example and this one. However, where the Largest City in X template is being used as a navbox, it should be removed as redundant as noted in the nom. Delete Egypt's largest cities by population, appears entirely redundant to Template:Egyptian cities as noted in nom as well as being less compact and less informative. CMD (talk) 07:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both per nom. The only practical difference between them and ((Egyptian cities)) is that they order the cities sequentially. That's not a particularly significant matter when it comes to navboxes — it's good for a list, but the fact that Mansoura is a tiny bit bigger than El Mahalla El Kubra doesn't help navigation. Grouping cities by population, as ((Egyptian cities)) does, is useful because it's a simple way to separate tiers of cities, so that Cairo isn't placed between Bilbeis and Dahab, but putting them in sequential order can be confusing because you have to look over a list to find the city. Plus, it's more complicated because cities grow and shrink, and the template can easily go out of date, while movement between the four tiers of ((Egyptian cities)) would be much less common. And if the sole purpose for ((Largest cities of Egypt)) is that it fill its current in-artile role, why do we need it as a template? Just subst and delete. In most cases, article content shouldn't be stored as a template, and this doesn't look like a reasonable exception to that general rule. Nyttend backup (talk) 00:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- And that's why WP:NAVCOLOR applies here because "largest cities" templates are arbitrarily decorative. Catchpoke (talk) 19:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Largest cities in Egypt and Delete Egypt's largest cities by population. As it was said before, the Largest cities set is used in other articles about countries. --2x2leax (talk) 19:10, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- There's currently an RfC regarding your concerns. Catchpoke (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both per Nyttend. Furthermore, Template:Egypt's largest cities by population, despite being placed in the navbox section, is not a proper navbox because it is only used on one page, thereby failing WP:BIDIRECTIONAL * Pppery * it has begun... 16:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.Relisting comment: Consensus exists to delete the "... by population" template, but opinions are still mixed on the other. Relisting to garner more opinions on
((Largest cities of Egypt
)).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 16:05, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 11. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Db-u3
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:38, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is a procedural nomination for this template family following repealing at WT:CSD. Primefac (talk) 12:51, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Hitchin Flyover
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused; and the same information is presented better in ((Hitchin Flyover & Cambridge Junction)). AlgaeGraphix (talk) 04:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Moderate-use
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused (was previously only used at ((High-use/doc)) for some reason). This isn't helpful - ((High-use)) is sufficient. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:16, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It just warns you not to make huge edits to that pageHappyMeal189 (talk) 01:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Clearly just someone experimenting. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- merge with high-use. Maybe that colour will make template editors and admins respect "use the sandbox first" and BRD doesn't apply to protected templates. Christian75 (talk) 15:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).