< June 14 June 16 >

June 15

Template:2020 Tahiti Championship Table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remains unused. The template says it's for the 2019 Championship, but the information is for the 2020 event. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 Thai League 3 Upper Region

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No mainspace for it exists. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 nine-pin bowling Single's World Championships events

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. --Trialpears (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template won't be used as the 2020 nine-pin bowling Single's World Championships was canceled due to the pandemic. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020–21 Hero Indian Super League Points table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 19:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020–21 Indian Super League season uses a different table but has updated information whereas this hasn't been updated since December 2020. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020–21 Israeli Premier League regular season table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 20:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020–21 Israeli Premier League uses a different table with the same information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 China League Two tables

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 20:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused as the first two templates contain no information and all three mainspaces for which the templates were created for use a different table for the standings. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021–22 TFF First League table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Template:2021–22 TFF First League table, but no consensus for Template:2021–22 Süper Lig table. No prejudice against speedy renomination although it is now in use. --Trialpears (talk) 20:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both unused and contain no information. The first template does not have a mainspace article and the 2021–22 Süper Lig article uses a different table. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Get year

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 20:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, seems to just be ((#time:Y|...)) with an extra check for four-digit input. User:GKFXtalk 17:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Boxing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND applies if someone thinks this will be useful in the future (the table is filled out). --Trialpears (talk) 20:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cycling at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND applies if someone thinks this will be useful in the future (the table is filled out). --Trialpears (talk) 20:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Content merged with Cycling at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

EditNotices on DAB pages (batch 1)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 20:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These templates are doubly wrong. (1) Unlinked and redlinked entries are permitted on DAB pages per WP:DABMENTION and WP:DABRED. (2) References are forbidden on DAB pages per WP:DABREF. For analogous cases, see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 16#Template:Editnotices/Page/Aslan (disambiguation), Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 28#Template:Editnotices/Page/Grace, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 May 25#Template:Editnotices/Page/IA and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 June 12#Template:Editnotices/Page/Manda, all of which resulted in deletion.

This is the first batch of a total of 70. The other 499 of these EditNotices are on name pages or lists, and unobjectionable (indeed, I would say a good idea; I'm all in favour of slowing down editors who might be thinking of adding vanity or other WP:NN entries).

Christina (listed above) is a DAB page which contains Christina (given name) and Christina (surname); EditNotices on those two (which lack them) might be appropriate, but the one on the DAB page is not.

David Clark (to be listed later) is an example of a ((hndis)) page which contains valid black- and redlinks.

Pietra (to be listed later) is an example of a DAB page which until today contained an invalid redlink (a leftover from a WP:AFD); sooner or later, they get caught.

I would like to thank WikiCleanerMan, who devised the search which made looking for and checking these notices easy.

Request to next passing admin - please add ((subst:Tfd)) to all these templates, which I am unable to do. Narky Blert (talk) 14:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they are unused as they are not used on pages they were intended for and that is part of the reason they are being nominated based on my discussion with the nominator. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They are in use. My argument is, that they should not be. Narky Blert (talk) 18:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Seems most (all?) of these were created by Alexf and they have a list of them here which might be worth checking. Gonnym (talk) 00:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that while I was posting the TFD notices, and have pointed Alexf to the DAB-only list I assembled. Narky Blert (talk) 05:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Templates created by Monkolitos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both are not an actual template. Lekki/Ajah: Nigeria is a shorter version of Template:Lekki/Ajah (Nigeria), and the latter can be moved to draftspace. --Minorax (talk) 13:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HBO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. There's a consensus that this is a suitable topic for a navbox, but concerns were brought up about the current version. Feel free to improve it as usual, but consider pinging the TfD participants as some of them are likely have opinions about it. --Trialpears (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navigational template - and somewhat redundant to others that exist such as ((WarnerMedia Studios & Networks)) and ((HBONetwork Shows)). Should either be used or deleted. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response: The template was intended to mirror similar network-specific navigation templates in use such as those for ESPN and Nickelodeon. As for why it hasn’t been used is because, in the time since I created the template, User:Steven (Editor) removed it from all articles associated with Home Box Office, Inc. properties in three different occurrences before proposing it for deletion (despite usual protocol for proposed template deletions being that the template remains in the articles where it was applied until a deletion is deemed appropriate). Despite lacking a consensus during the first nomination, the user removed it from the applicable articles when I attempted to reinclude it early this year, only for the template to be pulled again preceding a second nomination. I inadvertently left it alone as a result, likely to avoid the situation turning into a neverending cycle of removals of the template for deletion nominations that would never reach a consensus, making it OK to reinclude the template and have it stay in the articles where applied long-term. TVTonightOKC (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tvtonightokc: perhaps an RfC or some other method of resolution should be considered? Leaving this template unused is bad, it should either be used or deleted. I don't have an opinion on which option there is best. If this is kept at TfD, I'd consider that a rough consensus to allow it to be used (otherwise, there'd be no point to keeping it). Elli (talk | contribs) 15:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Elli, I previously nominated this for deletion, please see this TFD for info on what actually happened. Steven (Editor) (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Done-t

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Done. --Trialpears (talk) 14:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a redundant version of ((Done)) with a tick much larger than the text leading to unnecessary line height. MOS:ACCESS#Links also states that unicode characters should be avoided when being used as icons. The template should be redirected to ((Done)). Terasail[✉] 16:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Got it. Thank you for clarifying. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:52, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb: While that may be the rationale for the template. In practice it sees limited use on such pages, with most users just using ((Done)) or "Done:". It is just used as an alternate Done template with large line spacing. this shows that the 100 most recent transclusions of the template in the wikipedia namespace goes back to July 2017, indicating to me at least that there is a lack of use for that rationale. Terasail[✉] 11:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: with advertisement to the peer review and FAC projects, as it seems many (perhaps most) transclusions are used in those areas, as Sdkb mentions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canada roster 2021 IIHF World Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:HOCKEY does not create navboxes for teams that win Cup/tournaments/championships. – Sabbatino (talk) 06:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
More