The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep NYCS closed, delete everything else. Izno (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NYCS 14th IRT terminal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Complex Layout Fulton Center (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Culver IND south header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Essex (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Jamaica west M (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Lexington local weekend (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Lexington weekend (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Platform Layout Second Avenue Subway/Phase 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Second weekend (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Sixth Second (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Sixth header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS Third-138th (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYCS closed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Template:NYCS 14th IRT terminal, Template:NYCS Culver IND south header, Template:NYCS Jamaica west M, Template:NYCS Lexington local weekend, Template:NYCS Lexington weekend, Template:NYCS Second weekend, Template:NYCS Sixth Second, Template:NYCS Sixth header, and Template:NYCS Third-138th. The context for which these templates are valid, a temporary service pattern, is no longer used. For context, the NYC Subway changes its service patterns all the time, and there are hundreds of articles in which similar templates are linked (there are nearly 500 articles on subway stations alone). These templates are used to avoid the need to change hard code every time subway services are changed.
  Keep Template:NYCS closed. While it is unused at the present moment, page histories of several NYCS templates show that the template is used whenever a station is closed. Therefore, there is no need to keep recreating the template every time this template is needed. I am opposed to this being deleted.
  Keep Template:NYCS Platform Layout Second Avenue Subway/Phase 2 and Template:NYCS Complex Layout Fulton Center, purely on procedural grounds. These are not the same as the other templates and should be discussed separately. I am not opposed to these being deleted. – Epicgenius (talk) 22:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Template:NYCS closed per Epicgenius. Vcohen (talk) 07:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Template:NYCS closed per Epicgenius, classic example of a transclusionless template. Delete the rest as unused. Mackensen (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 12. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2022_FIFA_World_Cup_qualification_–_CAF_Second_Round_group_tables (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2022_FIFA_World_Cup_qualification_–_CONCACAF_first_round_group_tables (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2022_FIFA_World_Cup_qualification_–_CONCACAF_third_round_table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2022_FIFA_World_Cup_qualification_–_UEFA_group_tables (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Use Talossan English (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

English variety of a micronation; unused and is unlikely to be used. — Hydrogenation (talk) 20:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This micronation exists in the U.S. so it's unlikely the English is that different that needs a template such as this. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not a real nation, just like freemen-on-the-land, so no English variety found that isn't U.S. English. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 03:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Australian Radio Network. Izno (talk) 15:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Grant Broadcasters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australian Radio Network (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Grant Broadcasters with Template:Australian Radio Network.
Australian Radio Network's acquisition of Grant Broadcasters is expected to have been completed by November 30, 2021. ChocoMingo (talk) 20:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 8. Izno (talk) 15:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:STV_Election_box_candidate2_with_custom_party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:25, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Election winner list without party link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Election summary minor party with leaders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Election box winning candidate no party with winner (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Election box necessary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 13:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Province of Bordeaux (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Province of Paris (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Province of Rennes-(Dol-Saint-Malo) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Province of Toulouse (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Province of Tours (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Province of Clermont (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Province of Lille (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused French Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical provinces templates which were superseded by Template:Catholic Church in France. Gonnym (talk) 11:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete All links are included in the Catholic Church in France template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Red link disguise (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is clearly not a template we should use. It uses the style of a valid blue link instead of the red link for non-existing pages. Gonnym (talk) 11:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment it's not even accurate, it sets a linkcolor, but does not check if it is a redlink. Delete -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Portal/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Portal/Image lockboxes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Portal/taskforce (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused ((Portal)) subpages. Gonnym (talk) 11:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment have these capabilities been migrated into the module? -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 16:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  That's a valid question which I don't have the answer, but seeing as how Template:Portal was converted into a module in 2013 and these are unused, I'm sure that if a feature was missing it would have been requested by now. Gonnym (talk) 17:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Please delete: Thank you for finding these no longer used templates. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 17:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Celebrity Deathmatch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Has more "see also" links than works relevant to the main topic Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm probably leaning oppose here. There are 5 actual links of topics related to the series. I would however remove the see also section as it seems completely unrelated. Gonnym (talk) 06:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, connects six articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The related links are to shows that have very little relation other than association because of Eric Fogel. If you count them out, there are only four links related to the show outside the template title. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  The template title counts, that's a valid link. Gonnym (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The title is valid, but it's more about the links within the template that is the primary aid in navigation. And as TPH has stated, there is less of relevance to the main subject and most of the links have very little relation to each other. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WNBP todo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, well… Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 07:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).