The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:November 33rd and (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

At first instance, appears to be a hoax template. SPA account. Whiteguru (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Just nonsense. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Unicode chart Lycian Fonty (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template for non-existent Unicode block. Duplicates Template:Unicode chart Lycian. DRMcCreedy (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Duplicate template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This isn't an exact duplicate - they've added a character to the U+1029D position and updated the unicode version to 14. That being said version 14 is currently a draft, the official standard does not currently include this character and it's pointless making a new template, when the standard is released we can just update the existing one. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 01:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Unicode 14.0 won't include U+1029D. As far as I can tell, no one has even proposed a character at U+1029D, making this template even more baffling. DRMcCreedy (talk) 02:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a leftover from a sock of a serial vandal who liked to add templates like this to unrelated articles here is a typical edit. - MrOllie (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox competitive programmer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

After noticing this template through a current TfD discussion for a module in it, I do not see the reason to have this template when ((Template:Infobox person)) is sufficient here. This template is essentially promoting a website about its arbitrary ranks. Also, merging is not needed here. – The Grid (talk) 22:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Basketball color. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NBA color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Basketball color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:NBA color with Template:Basketball color.
This template has the same exact call to Module:Sports color as ((Basketball color)) (((#invoke:Sports color|color|sport=basketball))), so these are the exact templates, just with a different name. This template is another duplicate as ((BIC Basket color)). Gonnym (talk) 14:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: Is this basically just replacing calls to ((NBA color)) with ((Basketball color))?—Bagumba (talk) 07:53, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. See as an example:

• ((NBA color|Atlanta Hawks|1)) -> C8102E
• ((Basketball color|Atlanta Hawks|1)) -> C8102E Gonnym (talk) 09:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• If these are the exact same call, why is a redirect for a reasonable name insufficient? --Izno (talk) 20:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• redirect Frietjes (talk) 14:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Basketball color. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:06, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BIC Basket color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Basketball color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:BIC Basket color with Template:Basketball color.
This template has the same exact call to Module:Sports color as ((Basketball color)) (((#invoke:Sports color|color|sport=basketball))), so these are the exact templates, just with a different name. Even if this was used more than 4 times there would still be no need for the same template. Gonnym (talk) 14:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• If these are the exact same call, why is a redirect for a reasonable name insufficient? --Izno (talk) 20:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• delete ((BIC Basket color)) along with ((BIC Basket color cell)) and ((BIC Basket color cell2)), rarely used. Frietjes (talk) 14:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:37, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Baseball alternative primary color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Baseball alternative secondary color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Baseball primary color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused baseball color templates. Gonnym (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BAFLPrimaryColor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:BAFLSecondaryColor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused British American Football League color templates. Gonnym (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:AFP Cavaliers roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused roster with 1 blue link. Gonnym (talk) 14:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No navigational benefit. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:THL color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:THL color cell (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:THL color cell2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created 4 years ago and still unused. Couldn't find the articles for the teams listed in the /doc either. Gonnym (talk) 13:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NFLusealtColor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sport color template. Gonnym (talk) 13:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 September 19. Izno (talk) 20:44, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Australian_soccer_updater-W (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).