Template:Deji
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 09:49, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, no mainspace article, which has been repeatedly been deleted, and only a small amount of articles directly about the subject, which again is not notable. A non-notable subject doesn't need a navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Table of Tunisian governorates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. ✗plicit 09:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused as Governorates of Tunisia has a table list with most of the 2014 numbers. Table of Tunisian governorates by creation is just unused and to list governorates by creation should be information left up to being on articles. Not templates. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:2017 FIFA U-17 World Cup knockout stage bracket
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Template information has been substituted on 2017 FIFA U-17 World Cup. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Electric fish clades
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused chart which duplicates the chart used within the Electric fish article under the Evolution and phylogeny section. The chart within the article is working just fine. A template is not necessary here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- This was silently inlined by Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) a few months ago. This was a bad idea, but I don't care enough to correct it. Let whoever maintains this article deal with the mess, or else put it back. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I agree with nom that there is no point having a template here as it isn't used (or going to be) anywhere else; further, that it was in the article, not as a template, before Thumperward visited and made it into a template. I've no idea why he chose to do that, but am glad to hear he doesn't care to do that again. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:SEN FR
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 09:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary template which just has a link to the French Senate article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:59, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:MCA
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 09:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just links to the Malaysian Chinese Association article. No need for this. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Komuna e Pejës
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 09:46, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused seal template. No need to transclude through template space. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:54, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Diplomatic missions of Haiti
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 09:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Only two links. And the only such articles for Haitian diplomatic missions. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Content Warning Infobox
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G5 (User:FriendlyTamer) Though I commented here, I was about to speedy delete this page and thought I'd close this TFD discussion at the same time. Liz Read! Talk! 17:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Has there been a discussion about the need for this template on specific articles? --Another Believer (Talk) 06:23, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Because it's important for the readers to give warnings about the pages like the murder cases, dictators, and medias (AO-rated games and NC-17 movies). (This notice box belongs as well as heavily inspiration to RPG Maker Wiki, but I was credited as "Main Idea" with the current owner when I was a moderator for two years) Fortunewriter (talk) 06:25, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment WP:NOTCENSORED. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – there is a strong and long-standing consensus in Wikipedia that content warnings shouldn't be placed on any Wikipedia page, so this template can't be used. See Wikipedia:No disclaimers and Wikipedia:Perennial proposals#Content warnings. --bonadea contributions talk 09:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia:No disclaimers. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it directly contradicts policy and guidelines as noted zbive. -- Whpq (talk) 17:14, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Including that redirect page which is not a proper redirect to a template page. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Wikipedia has a disclaimer at WP:DISC for the entire project. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia does not provide disclaimers for individual content. Unless this is changing, the template is unnecessary. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 11:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:April 14–16, 2011 tornado outbreak/Map
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 December 26. ✗plicit 09:49, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).