The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:W3C-valid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Still no transclusions five years after the previous TFD closed as "no consensus" with only two contributors to the discussion. Clicking on the image takes you to an external web site, which is a bit of WP:EGG violation, IMO. This functionality would be better implemented as a gadget or script or an external page that people could link to, like the copyvio tool. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Unsatisfactory way of linking to it. Nigej (talk) 06:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Vanderbilt University Law School Alumni (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Most of this content already exists at the single article in which it would be useful, Vanderbilt University Law School. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Unused gallery. Nigej (talk) 06:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Valgbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. All substantive edits were made in 2007. This appears to be a template copied from Norwegian Wikipedia and then incompletely translated into English. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Uw-attack. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Uw-negublp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, does not appear to have been substed. ((Db-negublp))'s documentation says to use ((Uw-attack)). Since this template's name matches Db-negublp I suggest redirecting this one to Uw-attack. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Template:uw-attack per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Upper Houses of Irish Parliaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no main article. These articles could conceivably live in a category together, but they do not appear to be tightly related enough for a navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this and ((Lower Houses of Irish Parliaments)) (which should go too) seems to been abandoned in favour of the combined ((Irish legislatures)). Nigej (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:University of Maryland, Baltimore men's ice hockey navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions or incoming links for this navbox. No main article. Fails WP:NAVBOX. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Fails everything about a WP:NAVBOX. No parent article, no articles at all really, so no use for navigation. Nigej (talk) 21:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikiProject Space 2019/talk header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused set of tabs. User:GKFX^talk 20:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as duplicate of Wikipedia:WikiProject Space 2019/talk header which is used as part of the inactive WP:S2019. Nigej (talk) 21:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as author. ALSO, delete Template:WikiProject Space 2019/Candidates box to save us time for the exact same reason. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Coffeeandcrumbs you can speedy delete any you created. Gonnym (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikiProject Status/Active (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused subtemplate of Template:WikiProject_Status. User:GKFX^talk 20:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Was used briefly but quickly changed: "not using subtemplates allows the code to be better centralised" (Sep 2011) Nigej (talk) 21:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Wiki Loves Women 2020 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, and unlikely to be used as it's dated 2020. User:GKFX^talk 20:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. 4 red links? Presumably never got off the ground. Nigej (talk) 20:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tfd-inline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Kept in 2010 because people were familiar with it but presumably that is no longer necessary. User:GKFX^talk 20:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Eventually deprecated stuff needs to go and now seems a good time for this one. Nigej (talk) 21:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:UniMax (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article stub in a template. Content is also present at User:Jot70320/sandbox in more complete form. User:GKFX^talk 20:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete User made 6 edits totals and the creation of this was one of them. Nigej (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (qualifies for speedy G6). – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tomorrow+1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Day+2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template to display the date after tomorrow. User:GKFX^talk 20:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. We seem to have ((Day after tomorrow)) and ((Day+2)) too. 3 templates doing the same thing seems a bit extravagant for something hardly anyone ever uses. Nigej (talk) 21:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Added Day+2 as it was mentioned by Nigej; a little use but clearly redundant to ((Day after tomorrow)). User:GKFX^talk 23:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, duplicate. (I created this one when Wikipedia:Today's featured article started looking one day more ahead [1]). -DePiep (talk) 11:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Service awards/select2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to have been replaced by Module:SelectServiceAward. User:GKFX^talk 20:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom Nigej (talk) 21:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete most and no consensus for color scheme, but feel free to renominate it if you would like to see it merged with the main documentation page, or deleted completely. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Documentation/color scheme (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Documentation/color scheme for statistics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Documentation/docgreen1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Documentation/link box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Documentation/ruler (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Documentation/start box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Documentation/template page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused subtemplates of ((documentation)). The first two colour tables seem to be identical, not edited substantially since 2014, and slightly outdated (e.g. header underline colour is wrong). Ruler subtemplate is not part of how documentation is done on this wiki, it should be removed if template doc pages are imported from other languages. The rest look like they just used to be used by ((documentation)) and now aren't. User:GKFX^talk 20:01, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Template:Documentation/ruler (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) is not there to be part of English Wikipedia's standard documentation; it's there to prevent red link errors on importing templates from other Wikis... as it says on the template page. So if we delete it, someone will have to go around sorting those red links out manually instead of it being automated. Bermicourt (talk) 21:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I think that any documentation page being imported requires review (if not translation from another language) and removing a few red links would be the easiest part of that. If anything, the red link would be a helpful reminder to get rid of the line. User:GKFX^talk 17:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all except Template:Documentation/color scheme per nom. The idea that it is possible to blindly import templates from other wikis without adapting them to the English Wikipedia is fundamentally misbegotten. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep ((Documentation/color scheme)). Intended as documentation (ie, /doc ((documentation))). Now added to /doc § Technical details for this reason. Used [2] [3]. -DePiep (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC) (* I mean 'used' as in: did read the color value from this table. btw, could not update color values, hidden in WP:TSTYLE/css/module somewhere. -DePiep (talk) 06:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC))[reply]

The TemplateStyles page for Template:Documentation can be found at Module:Documentation/styles.css. SuperDragonXD (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as unused; Subst and delete Template:Documentation/color scheme as it is now only used in the /doc. Gonnym (talk) 08:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Documentation/sync (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Undocumented template to assist with synchronizing sandboxes with the the live template. I think the idea is you type ((subst:documentation/sync)) in the sandbox and save it, but it is quicker to type ((subst:msgnw:../)) and achieve the same thing without a template (or just copy-paste). User:GKFX^talk 19:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as redundant to Template:Documentation/mirror. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment if a redirect to /mirror will function correctly, the redirect to the /mirror subtemplate -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/PLT-sa (transclusions)

Being a selected article for a small portal (789 page views in the last 30 days) is a very meaningless feat, and yet the banner is placed at the top of a talk page and is larger than most other banners. Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Harmless enough. Could trim image to 25px to shrink banner. Portal:London transport/Selected articles/66 was created as late as 2020. However the use of the banner seems to have been abandoned earlier. Nigej (talk) 14:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  It actually contributes to Banner blindness as it adds to the already bloated top of talk pages. So not completely harmless. Gonnym (talk) 19:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Personally I'm less fussed about that in talk pages, since hardly anyone looks at them anyway. 100% agree the principle though, We're blighted by pointless hatnotes that everyone ignores. Nigej (talk) 20:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom—particularly in terms of the banner blindness. User:GKFX^talk 19:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Procedurally, this is not a template and should go to MfD instead. On the merits, delete per Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 August 11#Articles featured on portals templates * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is this not a template? It's designed as a template with parameters and it is used as a template by transcluding it. It's also used in mainspace talk, making it not a project sub-page. The only difference is the incorrect namespace used. Gonnym (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a template because it's not in the template namespace. It is my position that TfD should only be used to discuss pages in the template and module namespaces. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not useful, and I agree with the banner blindness concerns. The procedural issue, in my opinion, should be ignored. It looks like a template and quacks like a template. If it weren't deleted, a page move to the Template namespace would be pretty uncontroversial. Adumbrativus (talk) 11:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PL showcase article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This should have been a normal discussion message instead of a banner. Since this process seems to be dead (last active at 2010), I propose to remove completely from talk page and then delete. Gonnym (talk) 11:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Relates to being "a candidate to become a showcase article" for Portal:London, abandoned in 2010. Suggest that those articles that actually were showcase articles (see Portal:London/Articles) eg Talk:Chelsea F.C., have it replaced with the correct template ie ((Pl-sa)) and those that never were showcase articles eg Talk:Bruce Castle have it removed from their talk page, since simply being "a candidate to become a showcase article" is surely completely unimportant. Nigej (talk) 13:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I've switched talk pages over to ((Pl-sa)) if the article actually was a showcase article. The remaining ones weren't, they were just a candidate to become one. Nigej (talk) 17:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Note that I've nominated Template:Pl-sa for deletion. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Speedway race format - p9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It has not been used since its creation in 2009. 28 (talk) 04:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unused after 13 years. Two similar ones were deleted recently Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 30#Template:Speedway race format - t5 r5. Nigej (talk) 09:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox neighborhood subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 00:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment this should be part of ((Infobox settlement)) if this functionality is needed -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment there is actually no functional code there, just a PRE skeleton that doesn't apply to anything and metadata that is incorrect, since there's no template coding. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unused, unusable, and not needed. If I were feeling bold, I would have tagged this as speedy G2. It's not a template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete clearly surplus to requirement. Other infoboxes are available. Nigej (talk) 09:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox World Beach Games sport (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 00:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unfinished. Relates to sports at the 2019 World Beach Games (there's only been 1 so far). Currently using ((Infobox sports competition event)) at eg 4x4 beach volleyball at the 2019 World Beach Games. Looks like something very complicated was planned. Wouldn't something at Category:Multi-sport events infobox templates be better, although we're perhaps missing a generic ((Infobox event at (multi-sport) games)). Nigej (talk) 09:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox NCAA Division II men's basketball season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It's unused because we don't have any seasons for Div II. ((Infobox NCAA Division I men's basketball season)) is well used, eg in 2021–22 NCAA Division I men's basketball season. If someone did create the 2021–22 NCAA Division II men's basketball season article, the existing Div I infobox should be modified to handle Div II rather than creating a new template with all the Is replaced by II. It's quite rare nowadays that new infoboxes are needed, just modify an existing one. Nigej (talk) 09:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Kabaddi tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unfinished. It was copied from ((Infobox cricket tournament)) and still contains parameters for Most runs and Most wickets. Clearly surplus to ((Infobox kabaddi league)) which is currently used, and "can be used for any kabaddi league or tournament". Maybe this one has the better name, in which case Infobox kabaddi league needs moving here. Nigej (talk) 09:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

• Comment It occurs to me, that there should be a meta template for these things and the others that are currently in use, that is geneicized for any country. I see a ((Infobox state assembly constituency)) that might be generalized. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Often generic ones exist, it's just that editors have a great urge to create new ones with minor variations. Nigej (talk) 10:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Gonnym (talk) 10:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for now. We have a merger proposal (from July 2021) for this, see Template talk:Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency, which needs resolving first. Nigej (talk) 10:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair enough. Removing the tag. Gonnym (talk) 10:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Tamil Nadu Assembly Constituency (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused, although perhaps it's content needs to be considered as part of the merge noted above. Nigej (talk) 10:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Philippine legislative districts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unused. Probably unfinished. Currently basically a copy of ((Infobox constituency)) with the word "constituency" changed to "legislative district" so there's no sense in keeping it. If there is a requirement for these words, the constituency infobox needs modifying, we don't need new ones all the time. Nigej (talk) 10:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox England and Wales electoral division (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 00:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Seems to relate to "wards", ie individual electoral areas for local government. Generally we don't have article for these, see List of electoral wards in England by constituency. Nigej (talk) 10:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment User created ((Infobox England and Wales ward)) for the ward level, so perhaps the one being discussed is intended to be a generic version. Nigej (talk) 12:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).