- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 May 10. ✗plicit 03:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Infobox independence declaration
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. Many existing relevant articles use ((Infobox document)). It is unclear why a specialized infobox would be needed for a few dozen documents, but I could be persuaded. Examples from Category:Declarations of independence would be helpful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While I could see a use for it as it adds fields about from whom independence was declared, some fields like "Recognized" will be too subjective and nuanced for an infobox (Recognized by whom? The parent country? The international community?), and the "Republic" parameter is unclear in both its meaning and its relevance. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 16:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 May 10. Primefac (talk) 15:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Green Line coach routes
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Links two bus routes. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 12:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Currently links two routes. If there are no plans to create links for the other routes then this navbox may not make sense under current guidelines/practices. However if there is a standard in the Buses project to have a navbox for each company's coach routes, then I would still support keeping it. Also while there seem not to be many Green Line routes today, there were many in the past, so there is also the possibility that it could be extended that way. Another option might be a merge to a Green Line navbox. Good to hear from the bus people on this. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 15:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
- There are a few others, but it doesn't look like there is a standard thing to have. But really, even if some other routes might be notable, we should still consider WP:WTAF. --woodensuperman 10:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Blue Lights
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Articles included have been redirected but still not enough to need a navbox Indagate (talk) 11:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not enought articles to warrant a navbox. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 12:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice to recreation and perhaps userfy. Seems a little harsh to nom for delete less than an hour after it was created. But there is, currently, only one article. Quite possibly the creator is intending to flesh series, and maybe episode articles.
- All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
- I was lol, I made an article on series 1 and 2 but they got deleted FishLoveHam (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- To be clear, they weren't deleted just redirected, the content is still available in the history if there's anything that can be merged to the main article which is currently not long enough for a split. Indagate (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy or keep as as far as I have seen FishLoveHam (talk · contribs) is in the process of creating several articles, so this template will be needed soon. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I think WP:WTAF applies here. Wait until the articles exist before a navbox is created. --woodensuperman 09:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.