Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< May 30 | << Apr | May | Jun >> | June 1 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
MuchTime (talk) 00:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
I want to create a page for an individual and a company that I work for. I get that this would be an obvious COI, I am wondering what the chances of it ever being accepted?
Also IMO the company and individual should be on Wiki, as there are others with far lesser bodies of work that are. They, being similar entities, also seem to have far less references, and perhaps ones that are there are not all that reputable compared to the present Wiki standards. My question is, is it defensible to compare the notoriety of my entities to old submissions as a baseline or has the current standard of evidence been raised?
MuchTime (talk) 00:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Discrepancy between guidelines provided to me by a reviewer, and existing articles on Wikipedia.
I found that I was told that the three main inline citations did not meet Wikipedia's standard. However, I went through several Wikipedia pages on motorsport personalities. I noticed that a lot of these Wiki pages only contained one single inline citation, which led to the racer's Driver DB page. It is widely acknowledged that Driver DB is the most accurate record of motorsport on the internet. And I wondered why it was okay that the only verifiable source of a racer's accomplishments was accepted via Driver DB in some cases, examples below: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Theobald https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Bergmeister
And not in other cases - like the draft article that I am currently working on.
FowDay (talk) 03:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Because I am not exactly getting why my page is getting deleted again and again I am not understanding the mistakes.
Shaista.ameer (talk) 05:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Tollywoodcorns (talk) 06:17, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Can i please know why my article was declined
Thakur Golu Singh (talk) 08:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
I just need the reason why my article got rejected...
Can you please review it again?
89.138.228.20 (talk) 09:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Theaniketyadav (talk) 12:16, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Resolved
Sanderson462 (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I guess like everyone who gets declined, I'm trying to better understand the concept of significant coverage. If I'm writing about the piece of animation software that we developed, and makes use of inbetweening technology, what will we need to provide that shows significant coverage? For example, we have had users post 1 - 5 hours videos of them using the software and exploring the functions on Youtube. Does that count? While they're not journalists, they're definitely human beings who took the time to stream their use of the software online for their viewers.
Some scenarios just so we can understand what's acceptable / unacceptable:
Thanks for your help in this. Liewhz (talk) 17:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Nosebagbear, appreciate your response! I'll provide more information below. The magazine citations I mentioned are from different publishers. To cite them as sources, is linking to their online magazine overview sufficient? We can't link to the actual articles because they do not make it publicly available online.
CACANi has been mentioned in animation-related magazines, including Animation Magazine,"The Animag 250: Software Companies to Watch". Animation Magazine. 2015-06-17. Retrieved 2017-01-26. CGWORLD Japan (issues 209,"月刊CGWORLD vol.209(2016年1月号)、12月10日(木)発売。全国書店ならびにワークス オンラインブックストア他にて好評発売中! | CG・映像の専門情報サイト | CGWORLD.jp". CG・映像の専門情報サイト | CGWORLD.jp (in Japanese). Retrieved 2017-01-26. 212"月刊CGWORLD vol.212(2016年4月号)、3月10日(木)発売。全国書店ならびにワークス オンラインブックストア他にて好評発売中! | CG・映像の専門情報サイト | CGWORLD.jp". CG・映像の専門情報サイト | CGWORLD.jp (in Japanese). Retrieved 2017-01-26.), and INCG."INCG數位影像繪圖雜誌2016第26期-金石堂網路書店". 金石堂網路書店 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Retrieved 2017-01-26. Liewhz (talk) 00:35, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
|quote=
parameter of the citation templates to briefly quote the source you are paraphrasing, as described in the "Additional annotation" section of Wikipedia:Citing sources. --Worldbruce (talk)
Veena srivani (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
i am a beginner. so, i took time for learning wikipedia editing and i just came to know that i have to add reference list.
i have added the required possible reference list, please accept my re-review proposal, so that i can know that this draft is eligible or not.
Veena srivani (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I have recently published a page about a musical artist and it says that it has been declined because there not enough sources although I have put about 11 references, and 2 of them are in French because the artist is a moroccan/american citizen therefore in morocco their official language is french which makes sense why the articles are in that language.
any idea on how to appeal the rejection?
Ilyasshas (talk) 18:31, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
It keeps saying that it's declined on April 26th, but I am currently working on it on May 31st. I want to know what's wrong with the article I've written and what I can do to make sure that it doesn't get declined again.
ChristieChan1231 (talk) 22:24, 31 May 2019 (UTC)