Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< October 15 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 17 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Bhawika Mehra (talk) 05:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Meethashimn (talk) 09:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello everyone! An article I've written was recently declined and the message I got referred me to here, if I have any questions about how to fix things. For some context: I'm to write an article here on wikipedia about my professor of roman law. (I'm her assistant.) I've already successfully done so in german, my native language. I translated the article to english myself, as I'm bilingual, not really changing anything. The article was pending for a while and I just saw now that it was declined for the reason: "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia."
I take this to mean that the article lacks independet sources on the subjectmatter. I admit, the only reference in the article is a reference to a book she co-published. However I don't believe there are any other references I could add, since she doesn't have a biography written about her. I linked her info-pages from the universities she works in under "Weblinks". Perhaps I should move those to "References"? I'm not sure how I could change the article so it fits the criteria better. The exact same version in german was accepted rather quickly, which surprises me even more. I also worked on a chinese version with some colleagues from China and I know they had some issues at first as well but those seme to have been cleared. Any help or suggestion is very welcome. VonWerdt (talk) 10:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)VonWerdt
VonWerdt (talk) 10:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Would you please tell us what is wrong with our wikipedia page named "Alex Bros Jewellers" we have created and what changes we must do to get it approved. The page was created under the username "dancetome". The other pages we referred which are our competitors have been approved. Please guide us through the process.
Dancetome (talk) 11:09, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Dancetome (talk) 11:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
WHY IS IT REJECTED? ANOTHER JEWELLER AGAIN
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hill_Jeweller
Dcs ifm (talk) 12:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
REJECTION OF MY PAGE Dcs ifm (talk) 12:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
I am in the process of editing this submission to make it comply with feedback from previous editors. In the case of this institution, most of the relevant sources are internal to the University of Michigan, though not published by the museum itself. Are these viewed as outside sourcing?
UMMAA (talk) 13:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
known for its contribution to the understanding of a global human history.~~ OxonAlex - talk 14:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Comparing my page with other Wiki pages, we (meaning this company I work for, we only want to have an information presence on Wikipedia like all companies) assume that by 'multiple indepth sources' you refer to the References section. All other areas from what I can see are for linking to other wiki pages, and I've added a number of those links. So, I now have added extra Resources links to the page. We are a fairly young company so do not have lots of external sources, but I assume that young companies are not barred for this, only for trying to be salesy which I have not done. Please let me know if there is anything further you require. Alexander Andronkin (talk) 15:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
It has been 12 weeks seeks we last resubmitted this page, and still have not heard anything... can someone please look into this ASAP and let me know what we can do on our end to help move this process along? We first submitted this almost 4 months ago!
Stark and Stark (talk) 18:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, the article I created and wrote for our company, GameMine, has been rejected. I have cited sources with strong credibility and authority e.g. TechCrunch. Why am I being rejected despite being entirely fact-based? thank you. Warm regards, John
Milljohner (talk) 18:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
How can I change the title of this article? I want to remove the word "Brushless"PK2112 (talk) 20:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
PK2112 (talk) 20:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
THIS IS RIDICULOUS YOU MUST ACCEPT THIS PAGE OH AND BY THE WAY SINGLES FROM EPs ARE NOT SINGLES FROM ALBUMS TOO AND CAN I LET YOU KNOW THAT THAT’S WHAT I LIKE by BRUNO MARS WAS RELEASED ON JANUARY 30, 2016 I never made that edit but it’s right, check genius
And by the way acccept this right now there is no reason all of your reasons to delete it and decline it are incorrect. If you’re not happy with the page, you should be helping me with it, not deleting it. Wikipedia Editing is about editing, not deleting and declining. By the way, it’s a fact that you always lie lie lie you just keep on lying and lying Again this whole website is a whole lie and if you decline this again I’m going to tell you that this website is ruined and I don’t want you to do this again. You can’t. So fix up this website and make it reliable.
CheatCodes4ever (talk) 21:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it- No
The single or album has appeared on any country's national music chartNo - the Billboard Comedy Albums Chart isn't a national chart
The recording has been certified gold or higher in at least one countryIt has not
The recording has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis awardNo
The recording was performed in a medium that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc.- Nope
The recording was in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network- It was not
The recording has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network- it has not
You’re supposed to make pages of everything. Please read both WP:Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and WP:EVERYTHING ~~ OxonAlex - talk 09:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Rwdepalma (talk) 22:15, 16 October 2019 (UTC)