The following discussion is an archived proposal of the WikiProject below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or the WikiProject Council). No further edits should be made to this page.

The proposed WikiProject was not created. Closing proposal without creating project due to insufficient editor interest. Ajpolino (talk) 18:37, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Description[edit]

a project dedicated to making articles on this topic more accessible to the lay audience. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 03:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of important pages and categories for this proposed group


List of WikiProjects currently on the talk pages of those articles

Why do you want to start a new group, instead of joining one of these existing groups?

The goal of this project is to make its associated articles more comprehensible and better constructed to serve readers with different levels of knowledge.

I believe that this field is particularly challenging for the lay reader. Its newness and the "exotic" nature of many of its experiments and concepts defy easy attempts to understand. Unfortunately, many of the current articles fail to provide enough context and background before presenting the more technical aspects of the subject. These include Observable, Wave function collapse, Superposition, and Uncertainty principle.

This topic deserves a dedicated project. Of the 239 articles of , only about 36 of them concern QM and only about 22 are QM specific. A topic such as EPR paradox is only of mid-importance but would be at least high if not top importance to a QM project.

Support[edit]

Also, specify whether or not you would join the project.

  1. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 03:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC) will join.[reply]
  2. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 17:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Will join[reply]
  3. SeraphWiki (talk) 13:43, 24 April 2018 (UTC) will read along, but not joining[reply]

Discussion[edit]

@Headbomb: Is that done via the talk page? I think I agree. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 00:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I wonder, can this be in the scope of the new taskforce? Boris Tsirelson (talk) 16:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I also wonder, can v:Quantum Mechanics Beyond Textbooks and v:Making sense of quantum mechanics be useful here? Boris Tsirelson (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or at the WikiProject Council). No further edits should be made to this page.
Categories