Main pageAssessmentTo doMembersNewsletterTemplatesArticle alertsPopular pagesPortal
Nickelodeon task force
General information
Main page Talk
Project organization
Members Talk
Project category Talk
Departments
Assessment Talk
Newsletter Talk
Resources
Templates Talk
Style recommendations Talk
Articles
Article alerts
Cleanup listing
Popular pages
Unreferenced BLPs
Subprojects
Avatar: The Last Airbender
Task forces
Nicktoons
SpongeBob SquarePants

view · edit · changes

The following are style recommendations of WikiProject Nickelodeon, which tries to help editors improve the quality of Wikipedia's articles within the scope of Nickelodeon related articles. For Wikipedia guidelines regarding how to write about fiction in general, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction). These are only guidelines and may be altered depending on current Wikipolicies and/or project participant consensus. This is only a draft and should not be considered policy.

Neutral point of view[edit]

Make sure to write from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not the place for writing reviews. If you can provide factual records of opinions, that is of course excellent. Press reviews, awards (even if for nominations) and quotes from show directors and creators such as blogs can and should be used - those carry weight on their own. If there is more than one take on the subject, make sure to include all and to treat all as potentially true. For these, be sure to clarify that they are opinions, not incontrovertible facts.

Watch out for overly general and vague statements, such as "there are many who think This show is great" or "the movie is great". Such weasel words are not particularly factual and usually nothing but the author's opinions in disguise. Try to provide more specific information, and back the statement up with references to magazines, websites, etc. In addition, avoid peacock terms; these pieces of fluff actually lower the prose to an unprofessional level.

Content[edit]

Essential content

Each animation related article should include a minimum set of standard elements:

If these essential pieces of information cannot be found in reliable sources, then it may not be admissible within the article itself and removed.

Articles and related lists

All Nickelodeon television series, films, media or people which have an article will fall into a basic framework of three articles consisting of a main series or film article, a character list and an episode list, the latter of which should only be created if the main article becomes excessively long. Sufficient leeway is given that this is not set in stone, but the basic idea should apply across all articles.

Main series and film article

All main articles should follow this basic layout.

The intro paragraph. Also known as the head or lead, it will be the very first text which readers will scan and should be able to concisely communicate what the show is about. Introduce the name of the show in bold (three tickmarks), explicitly mentioning that it airs on any networks, and any other associated networks or relay stations. The creator should be wikilinked, if there is an applicable link. If the creator does not currently have an article, do not link it. Redlinks in the intro will be removed. Mention and link any associated or prior work for the creator. For animated films, series, and characters, the producer will be any animation studios and need not be explicitly mentioned. For co-productions, the production house should be mentioned and linked if possible. Give the air dates of premiere and if production has finished, the final airdate. Dates should not be wikilinked, as per WP:MOSNUM. A brief (one or two sentence) overview of the show can be incorporated into the introductory paragraph. Awards which are cited to the primary source (the awards organization) may be mentioned in the lead. Awards which are unable to be cited to the primary source (such as the day-time Emmys, which does not appear to maintain an archive), should not be mentioned in the lead, but may be mentioned in the body with a cite to a secondary source. Nominations should not be mentioned in the lead, but may be mentioned in the body, with the same citation stipulations.

The main text should give as much real-world information as possible, before any in-universe discussion. If known, a premise should be given. A premise is not the in-universe description, but the ideas which the creator had in mind whilst developing the show.

Production details should follow the premise. Mention or link to any external production houses used, as in co-productions, or a third-party house to help with non-Nickelodeon elements (i.e., SpongeBob SquarePants).

The internally parsed table-of-contents (TOC) can be modified to suit. If the article is addressing a newly launched show, the information may currently be slim, and a full TOC may be distracting. TOC's can be limited to level two, level three, etc., headings, to aid in presentation. See ((TOC)) for further details.

References

Ideally there should be some WP:V references. Refer to WP:RS. Primary sources are acceptable only if the primary source offers core information about the subject i.e. Rocko is a Wallaby. A primary source should not offer interpretation.

Inappropriate content

Below is a list of content that is generally considered beyond the scope of information of Wikipedia articles on animation topics.

  1. Non-notable articles and spinouts: Avoid creating new articles on non-notable topics. A notable topic must receive significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. A smaller article should only be split from a larger topic if the new article would itself be notable, notability is not inherited and the notability of the parent does not apply to the child article.
    Based on: Wikipedia's general notability guideline, and Wikipedia's guideline to avoiding unnecessary splits
  2. Numerous short articles: One large article usually provides better organization and context for a topic. Don't create multiple small articles when one larger compilation will do. The ideal article is neither too large nor too small.
    Based on: Wikipedia's guideline on article size
  3. Detailed in-universe explanations: Documenting a characters history can be helpful to understand their personality but avoid explaining minute elements of their personality which only appear once.
  4. Excessive fictional details: A concise plot summary is appropriate to cover a notable character or setting in an animated film or series. Information beyond that is unnecessary and should be removed, as articles should focus on the real-world elements of a topic, such as creation and reception.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Plot summaries, and Wikipedia's policy on undue weight
  5. Lists of minor events, media releases or characters. Specific lists of locations, villains for a given show and so on are considered inappropriate. Sometimes a concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the show.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Plot summaries and Wikipedia's policy on undue weight
  6. Rumors and speculation: Speculation about future episodes, films or spinoff series should not be included.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, Wikipedia is not a repository of original research or original thought

These standards have been developed in accordance with fundamental Wikipedia policies and guidelines and reflect the consensus of the community. All editors should understand and follow these standards, though they should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception.

Style[edit]

This is an encyclopedia, and articles should be written formally, not like fansites or blogs. In addition to the Manual of Style, keep these style tips in mind:

Verb tense

Naming conventions[edit]

For clarification in specific instances, please view:

Article construction[edit]

For information on what should be included in an article, please view:

Notability, guidelines, layouts and advice[edit]

For notability, guidelines, layouts and advice, please view:

Sources[edit]

Articles related to Nickelodeon must follow the requirements for verification and use appropriate reliable sources with inline citations to support the article.

There are several considerations for animation-related articles in regards to sourcing:

Layouts[edit]

Article criteria[edit]

This WikiProject spans several subjects that overlap, therefore we have restricted our following:

Article subjects that are within the WikiProject's scope

Article subjects that do not fit within the WikiProject's scope

Categories[edit]

Acceptable categories are:

External links[edit]

External links in show articles should follow the same convention for external links on Wikipedia in general. Certain links are recommended for these articles, while other links should be avoided. Specifically, external links should provide information that, barring copyright and technical restrictions, would be part of a Featured Article on Wikipedia. Restricting the type of external links to be added to articles helps to avoid the section from becoming a link farm. Additionally, Wikipedia is not a TV guide or your website or blog - external links should not be added to include material that explicitly defines certain aspects of the show or its characters.

Appropriate external links - These links should be present if possible in an article

Inappropriate external links - These links should be avoided in articles, though if determined by consensus to be valuable, they may be included:

Unacceptable external links - Links to sites that offer complete downloads, films of episodes, seasons, or other copyright-infringing works. These links are never allowed in articles and should be deleted without discussion if found

Templates[edit]

For main project templates, see the templates page for WikiProject Nickelodeon.