WikiProject iconEssays High‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
HighThis page has been rated as High-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

WikiProject iconLanguages Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Proposed deletion of Forlivese dialect[edit]

Notice

The article Forlivese dialect has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"There is no Romagnol dialect, but an infinity of Romagnol dialects decreasing from place to place, as continuous variations on a common basis." There is definitely a place on Wikipedia for documenting the Forlivese idiosyncracies of the Romagnol dialect, which is discussed in multiple WP:RS, though it is something that this stub presently does not begin to discuss. But these peculiarities are best treated at Romagnol, unless we are going to make an article about the dialectal idiosyncracies of 70+ municipalities of Romagna. (To my knowledge, no other municipality in Romagna has yet been afforded an article on its dialect.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New parameter on infobox language discussion[edit]

There is a discussion on new parameter on infobox language at Template talk:Infobox language#new parameter for de jure recognition of certain language that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Ckfasdf (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Sach language#Requested move 17 February 2024[edit]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sach language#Requested move 17 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Ruc language#Requested move 17 February 2024[edit]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ruc language#Requested move 17 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Dobrujan Tatar dialect#Requested move 14 February 2024[edit]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dobrujan Tatar dialect#Requested move 14 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. asilvering (talk) 19:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Mongolian language[edit]

Mongolian language has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Digital extinction of language[edit]

I'd love to do an article on Digital extinction of language, but unfortunately I'm over-extended and about to be away anyway. This is a topic that is definitely receiving attention. My early take on it is that it has two senses: minority languages that don't have a presence on the web, but are not immediately threatened otherwise; i.e., they are spoken/written, and the "extinction" refers only to lack of a digital presence. There is also another sense, I think, in which even if the language is relatively okay now, pressure from competing languages which do have a web presence (even other minority languages, even if smaller/more threatened) will eventually cause pressure on the ones that don't, and could contribute to their actual extinction, not just from the web. There are good articles from plenty of reliable sources.

Hopefully, someone will take this up. I have the (red-linked) title watchlisted; if you end up choosing a different title, please ping me to its talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Chinese language and varieties in the United States#Requested move 31 March 2024[edit]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Chinese language and varieties in the United States#Requested move 31 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 14:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help required to create private-use language tag for Anatolian languages at Template talk:Lang#Code for Anatolian languages[edit]

I need a private-use language tag for the Anatolian family of languages to use in Template:lang. However, I am having trouble coming up with something that fits the format used for these tags. Some help would be appreciated. Antiquistik (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute over usage examples at talk:Franglais[edit]

I seem to have waded into a minefield by restoring six example sentences at Franglais. They were deleted last year and again after I restored them as "unsourced" and "original research". I don't think they're research at all, and don't require sources as simple examples of something that's just been defined and cited to reliable sources. But another editor is equally certain that they are, and do. What we need now is other editors to weigh in and give opinions as to whether usage examples need to be cited to anything, or constitute "original research". This seemed like a reasonable place to ask. P Aculeius (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hokkien article and infobox[edit]

There's currently a discussion to establish consensus on aspects including layout and sourcing on the Hokkien article. Input from folks would be appreciated. Remsense 21:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stress marks in East Slavic words[edit]

Please join the work on the content of Wikipedia:Stress marks in East Slavic words. - Altenmann >talk 12:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]