This page is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This is the central discussion area for WikiProject Philosophy. Feel free to discuss any topics relating to philosophy here. It is recommended that members watchlist this page.
I have nominated Maximus the Confessor for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I have made brief updates to Quantum mind as well as to Orchestrated objective reduction as there has been new evidence recently published, not just on Orch OR but from other quantum experiments involving radical pairs. The 'QM' article seems to read well but is out of date, particularly under 'criticism', because of the new evidence. There are lengthy passages that are uncited and appear to be opinion. If any editors are across this subject it'd be great to work on the article. My message on the talk page has no response (there's a link to Nature on the radical pairs experiment there). I'll make further edits in the near future. Thanks. Thelisteninghand (talk) 20:55, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello WikiProject Philosophy people. I have been gradually trying to improve Consensus decision-making for over a year now. Yesterday I added a section on Consensus decision-making#History. However, I've mostly been alone in my editing. Not only would it be more fun to edit with others, I grow slowly uncomfortable about having too much editorial influence (and therefore having increased risk of my work being later removed).
This article is a bit of a mess, really, but particularly the section on indirectly self-denying statements (which I have flagged). I just wanted to note it here in case anyone felt like tackling it. Theknightwho (talk) 19:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
