This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Disambiguation link notification for June 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carberry highway collision, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
I'm not sure exactly what happened to this page but this AFD got very screwed up. Somehow, it's got two different listed discussions. I'm not even sure how to close it tomorrow. I hope a more technically-savvy administrator can sort it out. But I wanted to give you a head's up. LizRead!Talk!05:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
KEEP Thank you for your input, @Oaktree b. I appreciate your efforts in reviewing the sources. However, I would like to present several varied sources that support Gatt's notability, including academic publications. Gatt's notability is not solely dependent on his own published material, but also on contributions by others, impact, and recognition in the field. Here are some notable sources that establish Gege Gatt's notability
- "Çocuk, Oyun, Oyuncak Temalı Çalışmalar" edited by Prof. Dr. Derya Öcal, which touches on social individuality and the role of technology in the present day.
- Several academic peer reviewed papers such as 'Agile...' (peer reviewers: Fabri, S., Cassar, V., Fabri JP, Fenech G, Spiteri, J;) publication and the inclusion of Gatt's condensed view on AI itself indicates Gatt's expert status and recognition in his field. So much so, that the publication is a 'scholarly article' published by the University of Malta: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110560
- Other journalistic publications (such as Forbes and The Telegraph) also covered his pioneering work in the digitisation of public healthcare and societal services</ref>
- His work and key thesis are also published by the International Data Corporation (IDC) which is the premier global provider of market intelligence in their report on technology for island
- As well as several books that carry directly or through third-party viewpoints Gatt's ideas on AI and technology, such as the President of Malta's State of the Nation 2021 book These sources, among others, contribute to the evidence of Gatt's notability as an entrepreneur, IT lawyer, and thought leader in the field of artificial intelligence. They demonstrate his impact, recognition, and involvement in various fields beyond his own published articles. Therefore, I believe the provided sources establish Gatt's notability in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines and are verifiable.
Delete. WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Some seems hard to verify, even given the (inadequate) sourcing. The writing in this article is not NPOV, the inclusion of this article is not NPOV. —siroχo22:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Keep - I respectfully disagree with the delete request and maintain that Dr. Gege Gatt satisfies the notability requirements stipulated by WP:BIO. I posit that the array of evidence presented supports his notability and that the provided articles and references may have been inaccurately classified as "trivial mentions", "hard to verify" or "not independent of the subject". Let's reconsider this in detail:
Substantial Coverage: Dr. Gatt's work has been extensively covered in several independent and reliable sources, both locally and internationally. His thoughts and work are addressed in the 'State of the Nation Report' by the President of Malta, a source of high credibility . His thoughts on AI and Society also features in a book on the Maltese media landscape titled, 'Navigating the Maltese Mediascape'. The significant coverage in these esteemed sources underscores his notability.
Independent Coverage: Dr. Gatt's work in AI philosophy and digital technology has received independent coverage in academic publications, such as a peer-reviewed publication at the University of Malta . His work has also been cited in other scholarly publications, demonstrating his influence in his field such as: and
Leadership and Impact: Dr. Gatt is not only a founder of EBO.ai but has been instrumental in driving its growth and accomplishments in the AI industry. His leadership at EBO.ai is linked to his notability, considering his notable contributions to AI which are translated into actual implementation and independently covered by various sources.
In this regard, Gatt's views are also carried by a key 2022 International Data Corporation (IDC) publication. IDC is the premier global provider of market intelligence.
Comparative Notability: When compared with other Wikipedia entries in the same field, Dr. Gatt's contributions and the level of independent coverage he has received are equivalent to, or even surpass those of other notable persons.
The sources provided offer significant and independent coverage of Dr. Gatt's work and contributions to his field, extending beyond "trivial mentions" and substantiating his notability. I recommend a careful reassessment of the evidence prior to making a decision on deletion.
Our shared goal is to ensure that Wikipedia remains an accurate, comprehensive, and reliable resource. I firmly believe that Dr. Gatt's contributions to his field are pertinent to Wikipedia's global audience.
Let's continue this discussion with a broader array of voices and scrutinize the evidence comprehensively to reach a consensus that respects both Wikipedia's notability guidelines and the notable contributions of Dr. Gatt to his field. DigitalArchiver2020 (talk)
Hello, DigitalArchiver2020, it seems you are knowledgeable on the subject, if you feel it meets WP:BIO, consider reading WP:BETTER and taking your hand at a full rewrite, with an understanding of neutral point of view. A problem with this current article is that it comes across like a resume/linked-in profile. Many editors are going to have trouble rewriting it due to the level of problems and a lack of knowledge (each claim needs to be verified in the citations, evaluated for inclusion and phrasing to preserve NPOV, and so on). A non-neutral point of view is an agreed upon valid reason for deletion, even if notability is eventually established. It can be tricky to learn the the right voice, most of us continue to learn, but it's vital to creating a good encyclopedia. —siroχo23:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your response and valuable feedback. I appreciate your suggestions. I understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view and ensuring that all claims are properly verified and supported by reliable citations.
I agree that constant refinement and possible section rewrites may be necessary. This is precisely why my stance is Keep (as 'Delete' would remove that opportunity and is a measure too far). As a contributor to Wikipedia, I am committed to creating a high-quality and unbiased encyclopedia. With the right feedback and the guidelines outlined in WP:BETTER there is no reason why the standards of neutrality and verifiability cannot be met (assuming they are not already met - I am keen to hear others on this).
I acknowledge the challenges involved in rewriting the article, and preserving a neutral point of view. However this is the point. I (and others) are willing to take on such tasks especially when covering notable individual from small member states (like Malta) where the content (and access thereto) is limited.
I am committed to contributing good quality content to this and other pages which is why I feel Keep is the right call. DigitalArchiver2020 (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
The KEEP approach is the sensible route as the recommendations you provided are pragmatic, possible and will be implemented. DigitalArchiver2020 (talk) 12:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I didn't say that all content on Forbes.com is freelance, just content written by Forbes Contributors. The consensus on WP:RSP reads: "Most content on Forbes.com is written by contributors with minimal editorial oversight, and is generally unreliable."
If you click on the link, the byline specifically states that the author is a Forbes contributor.
Well, You're North American because You're from Canada sporting that red maple leaf flag. WP:RS really helps when doing WP:new page patrol and the decision to nominate them. It will definitely be of influence when reviewing references in the actual articles. NYC Guru (talk) 02:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
By American, I meant from the USA. I agree that WP:RS is helpful when doing new page patrol, but I'm not sure how this is related. I am not a new page reviewer, nor did I discover this article through a log of new pages. ARandomName123 (talk) 02:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Michael Katsidis in jail
Michael Alan Katsidis is currently in jail at Woodford correctional centre in Queensland.
I am happy to prove this for it to be written on his page  120.22.151.197 (talk) 02:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:
Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! Katietalk19:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
I gave you reviewer since you didn't have it for some reason. Nice CV work, thanks for your efforts. :-) Katietalk19:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Re: User talk page notification about blanking User talk:80.233.45.197
Please note that I was merely making the same changes as Arjayay made on User talk:80.233.60.187 back in May, which is clearing misuse of the talk page by a user whose sole edits were complaints about Wikipedia on that talk page. IP 80.233.45.197 is within the same range and was exhibiting the same behavior around the same time period in February. The IP range has since been blocked for a year with talk page access revoked.
I have reported the disallowance of the blanking on the false positive page. Coincidentally, Kaseng55 successfully blanked that page around the same time I was trying to. 104.175.74.27 (talk) 22:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Ah ok, sorry about the misunderstanding. I just saw a mass of user logs for that page, and assumed something bad was happening. ARandomName123 (talk) 22:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
walid belguerfi nominated for deletion
it says it is getting deleted for having no references I have now added 2 references and I am going to add more David3829128 (talk) 02:58, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Having references doesn't mean the article should be kept. The references should also provide independent, significant and reliable coverage of the subject. See WP:NBLP for more info. If you would like to, you can participate in the deletion discussion. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!03:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
they do have independent significant reliable coverage on the subject what more do I need to do to keep this wikepidia page. David3829128 (talk) 03:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Where? The sources in the article are interviews, which are not independent. The other sources are summaries of game results, which is not significant coverage. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!03:17, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
tell me what is then and I will add it because I am tetermined to not delete this wikipedia page David3829128 (talk) 03:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
I’ve tried looking online, but I couldn’t find anything that meets these guidelines. If you can, add it to the article. If you don’t want the article deleted, I suggest you participate at the AfD discussion I linked above. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!03:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
I only sent a couple, if their is any type of specific references that you want tell me and I will find some. David3829128 (talk) 15:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
All three links only provide passing mentions, not enough to show significant coverage. First article isn't about him, he's just mentioned once. Second link is a database entry. While he is in the title in the third article, his coverage amounts to a single sentence. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!15:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Ok, so I'm not sure about this one. It is better than the other sources, as it provides more coverage, and seems to be independent, but the translator I'm using isn't giving me the best results so it's a bit hard to determine the length/reliability of coverage. Regardless, multiple sources are needed, not just one.
I have added new references to walid belguerfi wikepidia page as you said they dont give enough coverage David3829128 (talk) 03:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
CR7
I don't want to send another edit request there because it wouldn't look good.... I just replied to you on what changes I wanted to make and there is no answer.
Don't understand why I almost get no attention there.... hope it's polotics or something.
Can you just make this little edit? I will very appreciate it.
Can't do it by myself because my user don't have 500 edits. CitizenZorro (talk) 18:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for missing the response. I didn't get a notification for that for some reason. Next time, you can ping me like this: @ARandomName123, and I'll be able to answer more quickly. I'll respond to the request on the article talk page. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!18:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you saw the message at the top of my talk/user page, but I am currently on vacation until the 16th, so I won't be able to make any changes to the article you suggest until then. Sorry about that, and thanks for reviewing. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!20:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
A Thank You to a remarkable Wikipedian who taught me a few more things about automating tasks on Wikipedia, and making me feel proud to be a Wikipedian, learning by doing.
The article Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter for comments about the article, and Talk:Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 08:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Hey @ARandomName123, I have reverted your edit on K. M. Bhaskaran. The facebook page which has the similar content was created on May 21, 2014 as mentioned on the page itself. It was the same day the Wikipedia article was also created. This feels more like a PR tried to create the cinematogrpaher's digital presence. I am sure the content was copied from Facebook and not vice-versa. Kindly check again and feel free to undo my revert if you think otherwise. Good day! Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for letting me know.
Given that they were both created on the same day, I feel it is reasonable to assume they are created by the same person. I'm not entirely sure how Facebook unofficial pages work, but according to this unofficial pages that have content copied from Wikipedia will have a Wikipedia icon at the bottom, which this page does not have, so you may be right. How do you feel about sending it to Wikipedia:Copyright Investigations? ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!16:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
No option in twinkle, afaik, but there are instructions on the page i linked and at Template:Copyright. I've done this once before, so i'm happy to do it if you aren't sure how, though it will have to wait until im like semi-awake or smth in a few hours. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!08:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Actually, I did try to add it. The copyvio template showed when I added it without the subst:, but the guidelines said that subst: should be included. When I tried with the subst:, It didn't show up in the edit preview and I didn't wanna make a mess in the edit history. Thanks for adding it <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
No problem! However I believe it just barely meets the notability guidelines, so it would be great if you could add another source or two. Thanks. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!17:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Draft:2016 Rhode Island Presidential caucuses
The sentence in which you are confused of refers to the delegate nomination process, in which voters vote for a candidate and the candidate gets delegates in their name for the republican convention. At the convention, delegates come together to nominate the candidate in which they were assigned to and the candidate with the most delegates gets the nomination to which party they are assigned to. Hope this helps! Zander123sims4 (talk) 01:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
@ARandomName123: Greetings. Regarding Draft:Ami Dror, I believe you declining my submission on the grounds of sources is completely unjustified. In contrast to your claim, the article is sufficiently referenced and sufficiently sourced from numerous reliable news outlets from Israel, the U.S. and China. I kindly ask that you reconsider your action and that you reinstate the article in the main namespace where it belongs. --Omer Toledano (talk) 05:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, the main reason I declined your submission was because you submitted it immediately after another editor declined it, without making any changes. There are also some slightly promotional bits, but that is easily fixed. Also, could you please provide 3 sources that you think contribute the most to his notability? Thanks. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!16:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
I am new to Wikipedia writing and have been working on my first article which was declined due to many reasons. I know since it is my first, I had done several mistakes. I am working on the article tone. However, I am not sure about the links and citations. I included some pdf, journal articles, newspaper articles, youtube links as references. Some of them had client's academic and career information published by his universities as a scholar. I also included some websites containing client's work. Can you please let me know what I had done wrong?
The article says it needs pretty much a rewrite, which, I would happily do.
Comment: Pretty much needs to be entirely rewritten. Sources are needed for the unsourced bits. Please remove external links from the body, and cut down on some of the works. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!17:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see this has also been posted at the teahouse and the editor there basically hit all the points I was thinking about. I've added a bit more of my thoughts there as well. Please follow the guidance given there. Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!18:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
To answer your questions:
Yes, all external links in the body have to be removed (which I see you have already done) per WP:EL
I'd say keep the ones that have received the most news coverage/reviews, and remove the rest. The ones that have their own Wikipedia article could also be kept.
Thank you so much! Yes, I understood what the editor of teahouse said, and I am restarting with backward writing.
As you had re-read the article, can you please let me know whether I got the "tone" right? I tried my best to keep it unbiased and plain, while being informative. Do you have any suggestions for more improvements? I am highly interested in contributing to Wikipedia, and I really appreciate the restrictions you are adhering to despite thousands of daily articles. That means quality! BizChrome (talk) 03:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Good Day Good Sir,
I appreciate your thoughtful review of the test article's content. Regarding "The United States of Libya: A Study" it is a hand-written document that will be available in digital format soon. Official sources will be used in collaboration with the state to ensure its accuracy.
It's important to note that this article served as a test sample, intended to illustrate the final form of the scientific article that will be published in the near future. Thank you once again for your review, and I apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Thanks for fixing up my article, I was hoping someone would make it more easy to read, but I was just wondering which content in particular was found to be copyrighted? Thanks, Galaxy111 (talk) 08:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Draft:Our Lady of Guadalupe Church (Omaha, Nebraska)
can you please check a Draft:Our Lady of Guadalupe Church (Omaha, Nebraska) is upload to article Submission declined or aspect? JNOJ1423 (talk) 19:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
@JNOJ1423: Most of the article seems to be closely paraphrased or copied from your sources. This is not allowed due to copyright concerns, so please rewrite in your own words. Also, "One of congregation lady told me this." isn't exactly allowed as a source. Thanks. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!19:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, ARandomName123! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jauerbackdude?/dude.17:44, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback on my first contribution. There is so much information on Wikipedia it's overwhelming. Wondering if there are some specific things you can suggest in order for me to improve my article?
I'm a bit confused as to who you're messaging and what you're asking here. If you're messaging Jauerback, please leave a message on their talk page. If you are messaging me, please create a new section. I'm also not sure what you mean by "first contribution"; your only edit is this message. If you could clarify, that would be great. Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!15:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi ARandomName123, and thank you for keeping an eye out for text copied from incompatibly licensed sources. Your recent revdel request is greatly appreciated. Make sure you do not add |cleaned=yes to such requests, as the text hasn't really been "cleaned" until an admin comes along and revdels the old versions. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for continuing your excellent copyright cleanup work. The past couple revdel requests of yours I came across were definitely in need of action. As you're using the cv-revdel script, you may want to uncheck the "Include End?" box more often or end the requested range one revision earlier. For example, admins don't need to revdel the edit in which you remove the copyvio. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
@Firefangledfeathers: Hi, I followed your suggestion to uncheck the "Include End?" box on this edit, but it only showed one revision to redact, even though there are multiple revs between the addition and removal. I also tried ending the range one revision earlier, which gave a range, which was what I expected. Which one is correct? ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!22:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
I tested and am having the same issue. I'd go with your second option there, which worked perfectly, moving forward. Trying to see if I can get a bit more testing in and then I may talk to the script's creator. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Exclusion of list of all articles/Updating revelant sources
Hello @ARandomName123, thank you for the earlier feedbacks as regards adjusting the article. Please can you take further look again. Immense thanks. Alao Abiodun (talk) 03:14, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Please take a look at WP:NPOV and add a another source or two to prove notability. If you need further assistance or a second opinion, you can also ask at WP:AFCHD. Feel free to resubmit once you have finished the improvements. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!17:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Thanks @ARandomName123! Are you looking at the e-book for the paperback or hardback edition? I'd like to cite page numbers for the following quotes:
"Specifically, in the recent election, the Village of Central Lake included a proposed initiated ordinance to authorize one marihuana retailer establishment within the village"
during the rescan of Antrim County's ballots, the Dominion machines wouldn't accept three ballots
Trump directed aide Molly Michael to email the report to the Department of Justice with the subject line, "From POTUS." It included a set of the "Antrim County Talking Points" for Jeff Rosen, soon to be acting attorney general. rootsmusic (talk) 23:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
@Rootsmusic: My version is the ebook, but the page number changes whenever you change the font size, so I'm basing the page numbers off the index at the back of the book. If you need any excerpts, I'd be happy to send you some.
I'm a bit confused as to what you're asking, could you please clarify? If you're asking about how to get started contributing, check out our Getting Started page, or look through some suggested improvements at Special:Homepage. If you're simply asking about interesting articles, look through our portal page for articles grouped together by subject or our featured articles. You can also click here for random articles. Feel free to ask me if you have any further questions. Happy reading! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!20:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ontario, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sault Ste. Marie and Sudbury.
Hello, ARandomName123/Archives. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.CiaraDiara (talk) 01:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi ARandom, I sent you an email about my page with some questions! Thanks for being very speedy! CiaraDiara (talk) 01:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
@CiaraDiara: Hi, I've received your email. Do you mind if I respond here? Or would you rather I respond to the email? Either is fine with me. Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!01:58, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Acceptable references are sources that are published and independent of the subject, where there is little reason to doubt the publishers reliability. For example, the local news website you cited was fine, but a random blog for example, is not. However, if the blog, or similar self-published source was created directly by the subject of the article, and satisfies the criteria at WP:BLPSELFPUB, it may be used as a reference. Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources and Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Reliable_sources contains a lot more information on this, if you need further guidance.
Regarding the Police Explorer program, using primary sources on biographies of living people should be avoided whenever possible. A secondary source, like a news site is preferred. If your primary source contains personal information, it can not be used. Please see WP:BLPPRIMARY for further guidance.
Generally, for biographies of living people, every sentence that contains a quote, or any potentially challenged information must be sourced. In practice, it's best to make sure every sentence, or at least every paragraph, is sourced. Unsourced information can be removed at any time.
Yes, the amount of links to other articles is acceptable. They are generally used for words where the reader might not understand, or want to know more.
Please make sure your article is neutrally worded. Words like "intrigued" and phrases like "where he did not excel due to repeated bullying and other issues in the education system," should be avoided unless attributable to reliable, secondary sources. As a final note, please disclose any conflicts of interest you may have. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!16:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Question from Shaan Khan Bekaboo (11:39, 8 October 2023)
I have written an article regarding a senior police officer. I need some help to add references. I have added the links in the reference section but it seems not to be working. --Malik2308 (talk) 14:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
@Malik2308: Hi, and welcome!
If you're using the visual editor, there should be a toolbar at the top that looks like this:
Click where in the text you would like to add a reference, and click on the cite button on the tool bar. It should bring up something like this: Paste in the link, and press generate. If it doesn't work, click Manual, and choose the relevant format. Fill the form with information and press Insert. This should insert an inline reference, and automatically add it to the bottom of the article. Further information can be found at Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:VisualEditor#Adding a new reference. If you need further assistance feel free to ask me. Good luck on your article! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!16:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
I need some assistance from you to enable me finished these assignment strong. I help in find appropriate answers to the questions. --Grand.Safer (talk) 19:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi ARandomName123. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Question from Boilerup1 on Trey Yingst (16:23, 11 October 2023)
How do I add a short sentence to Trey Yengst’s Education section? --Boilerup1 (talk) 16:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, @Boilerup1:
There should be an edit button at the top of the page, or next to the section heading. Just click that and you will be taken to the editor. Please note that all information added should be supported by a reliable source. If you need further assistance, check out our introduction page, or message me again. Thanks, and welcome! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!16:32, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi ARandomName123, if you believe it meets the notability criteria, I have no issue with you accepting it. I do think it fails WP:NPOV though and suspect COI. S0091 (talk) 21:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi @S0091, I was a bit on the fence on this one, so your second opinion was appreciated. I was going to accept and cleanup the tone as needed, and I agree that there seems to be a possible COI, so I'll leave it as a decline for now. Thanks for notifying me! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!22:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
They did make some improvements and resubmitted it and also addressed the COI concern, a former student which I don't think meets COI. Like you, I think it is borderline so thought it best accept and let the community to decide. S0091 (talk) 17:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
@AstroSaturn: I'm not too familiar with that topic area, but there are a few things that need to be fixed. Wikidata and the commons should not be used as sources. A summary of what happened is also needed, since the original summary was removed. Also, please be aware that editing and creation of articles relating to Palestine/Arab-Israeli conflicts are under editing restrictions per WP:ARBPIA4. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!20:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello my mentor, how could I know how to edit and write article in Wikipedia joining the community for the first time? --Jkyem24 (talk) 21:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
@Jkyem24: Hi, and welcome!
If you'd like to learn how to edit, our tutorial is a good place to start: Help:Introduction. If you already know the basics of editing, and would like to see what to edit, there should be some suggested edits at Special:Homepage. There are also more tasks at Wikipedia:Task Center.
Creating an article requires you be registered for at least 4 days, and have at least 10 edits, as it's recommended that you get some experience with Wikipedia first. However, if you aren't able to wait the 4 days, you can submit a draft at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. I also recommend reading Help:Your first article for some helpful tips.
Thanks for your reply. I will go through the above information and have the understanding of the basics of editing as you mentioned above. Jkyem24 (talk) 21:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Question from Mohanrajnellipudi (16:32, 24 October 2023)
I noticed that you struck through my comment on the talk page for Shani Louk's article. I'd like to understand the specific reasons for this action, especially in relation to the WP:ARBECR and WP:PIA references you mentioned. I genuinely want to contribute constructively to the discussion.
@Shaul7, thanks for your interest in contributing!
To answer your question, WP:PIA states that any pages related to the Arab-Israeli conflict are under what is known as extended confirmed restriction. That is, only editors with over 500 edits and 30 days tenure are permitted to edit articles in the topic area. This restriction also applies to internal project discussions like articles for deletion, which was why I struck out your comment. However, you are able to make suggestions or edit requests on article talk pages. More information can be found at the pages I linked in my strike, WP:ARBECR and WP:PIA.
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
This award is given to ARandomName123 for collecting more than 100 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
@ARandomName123: Hi again. Could you please help me? I don't see why the article keeps getting rejected. I don't see any logic behind these rejections. Ami Dror is a well-known and notable personality in Israel. --Omer Toledano (talk) 03:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
@Omert33: Hi, you'll have to ask the rejecting reviewer for another chance. Unfortunately, I haven't been reviewing many AFC submissions lately, so please ask for help at the Teahouse or the AfC help desk. However, the comment left by Ca seems to sum up the concerns pretty well. Some in-depth, independent coverage would be needed. Thanks for your work, and sorry if this isn't as helpful as you expected. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!15:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Question from Cman cat con (13:05, 8 November 2023)
@Cman cat con: Hi! To make an article, please follow the step-by-step instructions in the Wikipedia:Article wizard. This creates a draft. Once you have completed it, you can submit it for review, where an experienced editor will check to see if it meets our notability guidelines. This involves checking if the subject of your article has been the subject of independent, significant coverage by reliable sources. If it meets this guideline, it will be accepted, if not, it will be declined and you will be able to make improvements. Please see Wikipedia:Your First Article for more helpful information.
Question from Thisbarbieedits (20:10, 8 November 2023)
Hi 👋 . I listened to a great TED talk today where the speaker said that Wikipedia always needs more editors. It's something I'd love to contribute to as it's something I use daily - where do you recommend I get started? --Thisbarbieedits (talk) 20:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
hey! I'm wondering if I can make a wikipedia article on a smaller online band? I do not know how to make a artice. sorry if this is a waste of time ;-; --1100c (talk) 02:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Question from Aviator Jr (04:10, 24 November 2023)
Hello... I made some edits on a page along with proper references. But without reasons all the edits were reverted. Some details on the page are wrong info. --Aviator Jr (talk) 04:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
@Aviator Jr: Hi, it would be best to take it up with whoever reverted your edits. Sorry for the non-answer, but it's currently 11pm in my timezone and I was about to head to bed. If you have more questions, feel free to ask me, and I'll answer them at some point tomorrow. You can also ask for help at the Teahouse. Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!04:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi @Aviator Jr: Adding references to the talk page should be the same as adding references to an article. There should be a button that says "Cite" at the top of the page when you enter editing mode. Just click that, and enter the relevant info. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!15:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Introducing myself, no real questions yet, I’m here because your highjohn the conqueror entry is embarrassing, typos, syntax, and ridiculous kiddie politicized content
I gotta fix it
Then decide what next, this feel like a major potential time suck
Learning by doing is a perfectly fine way to start editing, but you may want to preview your edits before you click publish to check if you've made any formatting mistakes. If you'd like a more structured guide to contribution, there's one at Help:Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!13:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This first meeting language will be English, but we plan to host conversations in other languages, and about other topics. Please visit the conversation page on-wiki for the details on how to join. You can also watch the page, or suggest ideas for upcoming conversations there.
Impact Module
At the beginning of November 2023, the Growth team deployed the New Impact Module to all Wikipedias. We recently released a follow up improvement to how edit data was displayed based on editor feedback. [2]
Developers can find some initial proof of concept code shared on gitlab.
Mentorship
When a mentor marked themselves as "Away", they were not getting their name assigned to new accounts when they returned. This has been fixed. [6]
We improved the message received by newcomers when their mentor quits, to reduce confusion. [7]
We worked on ensuring that all mentees are assigned to an active mentor. This required reassigning mentees with no mentors to a new mentor. We paused this as the clean-up script confused some editors. We will resume it when the identified blockers are resolved. [8]
It is now possible to create an Abuse Filter to prevent one user from signing up as a mentor. [9]
Hello ARandomName123,
I want to add the name of Candace Parker's son to her wikipedia page. I would like to make the following edit: "Petrakova gave birth to a son, Airr Larry Petrakov Parker, in February 2022." When I inserted a citation, it said 71 rather than 83. Here is the article link: https://people.com/parents/candace-parker-welcomes-baby-with-wife-anna-petrakova/ Is this how it is supposed to work? Thank you, Lanita --Lanitaf (talk) 22:56, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. I read the privacy of names article you referenced. The name is in the People article and in a separate documentary called Unapologetic. Since it is mentioned a few times, does this seem reasonable to you? Lanitaf (talk) 23:39, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
it seems odd that Wikipedia lists her daughter's name and her dog's name. She also proudly appears in ad campaigns with her whole family. Lanitaf (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
She talks about her family as a sports broadcaster too. I am a little confused. Writers like Jacqueline Woodson also have their childrens' names listed and there is only one citation. Lanitaf (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello again.
How do I add this article from The Boston Globe that LaDoris Hazzard Cordell wrote to her page? The link is here: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/06/20/opinion/fatal-flaw-judicial-politics-how-outrage-around-brock-turner-led-centuries-extra-prison-time/
There is a section that says that she is a frequent legal commentator for CNN, NPR, etc. It would be grammatically incorrect to include this to the list without a semicolon.
Tangentially I also have multiple citations for her on different news networks? She actually called former President Trump a "chatty Charlie." How would I add this? Thanks, Lanita
@Lanitaf: When you enter editing mode, there should be a button at the top that says "Cite." Click on that, and fill in the necessary details. It should be formatted automatically. Unless you feel it is crucial for reader understanding, or has generated secondary news coverage, calling Trump a "chatty Charlie" is generally not something we would include in the article. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!23:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Public domain? Why?
What's the justification for asserting that material is public domain?
@Sphilbrick: Unless otherwise stated, works created by the US federal government is in the public domain, no? There's no copyright notice anywhere, and no indication that anyone other than that US gov. agency wrote that text. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!21:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Cleanliness
Cl
eanliness is half of fait 1.During the summer months we should bath regularly as we tend to perspire more in the heat. 2.Apply perfume as it is Sunnah to do so. 4. Clothes should be be changed regularly.h. Mtkodudjjfjnxujrbtjfijxjhjrhvyjf (talk) 18:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, global accounts are now the default on all Wikimedia projects, so there is no need to create one. An account will automatically be created when you go to a different language wiki. You can view a list of your global accounts at Special:CentralAuth. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!03:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Captain Mohamed Nazim
Please detail to us how the links are as mentions. The subject of the articles is the person itself. please explain your decision why SIGCOV is not met.
Previous two users could not explain why and are silent. If you dont check articles properly of follow others it will hurt Wikipedia. If I was wrong please explain politely why this is not SIGCOV. I have been here for quite a while and carefully select people based on rules to populate Maldives wiki. Existence Leesaaisath19:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
@Leesaaisath: Hi, all of them are about his appointment to managing director, and there's no coverage in the articles apart from that. Additionally, if this is the only thing he is known for, WP:BIO1E applies. If you would like a second opinion, you can ask at the AFC help desk. Thanks, ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!23:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
That's wonderful, thank you for the explanation. That helped me alot. This is what I always ask from people here. We are volunteers and explaining the rules without diminishing a person is all that matters. Existence Leesaaisath07:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello could you kindly review Draft:BasiGo. It was declined last week but after making changes the reviewer said it was fine but couldn't review again and accept to be fair to everyone else. It has been a week now I don't know what to do. Apologies if I have not followed any correct protocols. Kindly assist. Thank you. Serrwinner (talk) 17:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Question from PianoMusicLover (21:19, 20 December 2023)
Hello there:
Do citations always have to end up being footnotes? Or is there a way to have a citation without adding more footnotes to the article?
Thanks for the help! --PianoMusicLover (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
@PianoMusicLover: Hi, yes inline citations end up as footnotes. However, if you are writing a paragraph and one source supports it, you don't need to cite it everywhere, just at the end of that paragraph. If you have any other questions, lmk. Happy holidays! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!21:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Can you also tell me would the "External link" section be the correct place to put a newspaper article interview? Thanks! PianoMusicLover (talk) 01:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, can you help me review the draft:Mohamed Aarab I created it and added reliable sources that represent a musical personality. I also reformulated it, as some other officials requested. I hope you can help me. Thank you. Sorry for the inconvenience. Chamosuhdod (talk) 23:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
@Chamosuhdod: Someone will eventually get to your page, please be patient. Unfortunately, not many people here can understand Arabic, and machine translation isn't the best. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!01:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Nearly five days have passed and there is no response. I hope you will try to review it because, as I said, there are many pages that have Arab sources and have been approved. You are more experienced, so I have full confidence in your review Chamosuhdod (talk) 01:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
@Chamosuhdod: Five days is still remarkably shorter than a few months ago, where articles were taking up to five months to be reviewed. Taking a quick look at your page, I believe it's unlikely to pass, as most of the sources are rather short. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!02:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
What does it mean it's short? Reliable secondary Arabic sources: As I mentioned previously, there are pages that contain Arabic sources and pages that contain only two sources It was accepted Chamosuhdod (talk) 11:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
As I mentioned previously, I don't speak Arabic, nor am I familiar with its news orgnizations, so I can't accurately assess whether the sources are reliable or secondary. I'd like to note that none of the two articles you mentioned have been through the AfC process, so haven't been through this type of review. Additionally, just because another article exists, doesn't mean it should. Please see Wikipedia:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!13:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
So what is the solution? Everyone says he does not speak Arabic, but how were these two articles that I mentioned previously approved because they have Arabic sources? Chamosuhdod (talk) 14:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
As I mentioned, none of the two articles have passed through the AfC process. The solution is to wait, someone will eventually review your article, whether because they speak Arabic, or whether they are willing to use a machine translation. Please note that everyone here is a volunteer and reviews whenever and whatever they feel like. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!14:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive
– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding ((subst:Happy holidays)) to their talk page with a friendly message.
Happy Holidays! I asked a “user” to provide the rule they used to indiscriminately delete the occupations from an infobox, and they failed to respond. I have reviewed Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes, and it seems I complied with “the purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article (an article should remain complete with its summary infobox ignored, with exceptions noted below).” I’m not clear what to do next: get a second opinion, or simply restore what was taken? Considering the source: the user has a vandalism rating of 3, and uses profanity in disagreements with other editors, i.e., a clear liability to both Wikipedia's reputation, and the cohesion of its editors. SPS888 (talk) 15:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Just to be clear, that guideline also states that there is no rule for what to include in an infobox; it should be determined via consensus on a case-by-case basis. Additionally, the vandalism rating isn't a reflection on the user (I have the same template on my user page!), it's supposed to give editors an idea of how frequently others are vandalizing articles, enabling us to determine if we need to help patrol recent changes. My recommendation is to discuss with the editor; if they fail to respond after a reasonable amount of time, feel free to restore.
However, I'd like to note that their removal of the middle name is correct. The "Name" parameter is supposed to be for the name most commonly used in sources, not their full name (which can go in birth_name). Most of the sources I checked in the article refer to her as LaDoris Cordell. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!17:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Vandalism is a pretty harsh word; I’m not sure if it’s a productive way to label the issue… Regarding the naming convention: If television appearances are included in the sources, the birth name is included more often than not: https://judgecordell.com/audio-video.
I think the overriding issue here is one user is creating content in good faith, while another is indiscriminately destroying content without explanation. It's inefficient. SPS888 (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Google shows nearly triple the hits for "LaDoris Cordell" compared to "LaDoris Hazzard Cordell." Regardless, just restore what you feel needs to be restored, and if a revert happens again, begin dispute resolution as necessary. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!20:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Can/should the Template "Infobox person" be changed?
Hi, @ ARandomName123: Instead of reverting to the "occupations" that were deleted, can/should the "Template Infobox person" be changed to "Template: Infobox officeholder." If so, how? Why: I'm not clear how to add the following to the current Infobox template:
Judge of the Superior Court, Santa Clara County, San Jose, California
In office
June 1988 - February 2001
Elected: county-wide contest
Judge of the Municipal Court, Santa Clara County, San Jose, California
@SPS888: Yes, that should be fine. I've converted the template to Template:Infobox Judge (which is a version of Template:Infobox officeholder) by simply switching the wikitext from ((Infobox person to ((Infobox judge. You can fill in the necessary office details as needed. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!16:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)