Hello, Grnrchst, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding ((U|I dream of horses)) to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:09, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey Grnrchst I see you are busy with List of anarchist communities so I was wondering if you had any time for Wikipedia:WikiProject Squatting? Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 22:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Please remember to cite reliable sources when adding content to an article. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) (Talk – Contribs) 18:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article Taborites. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. - Epinoia (talk) 15:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello Grnrchst, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Grnrchst,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 01:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 18:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Sm8900 (talk) 18:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Grnrchst, I accidentaly used the rollback button, my appologies. (Please see Talk:Anarcho-pacifism#Black_and_white_bisected_flag for the reason why I did removed the flag. It's Wikipedia-fantasy. I would also like to know the sources for the other flags like File:Jewish Anarchist Flag.png) Best regards −Sargoth 20:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Hog Farm (talk) 01:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
I've noticed a number of small mistakes/factual inaccuracies in your recent additions of infoboxes (specifically the Old Copper Complex and Adena culture articles). Information in the infoboxes should be contained within and cited in the article body. Please be careful what you include in them in the future. Cheers, Heiro 23:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for creating Land and Freedom Column. It appears to be a translation of the Spanish language article "Columna Tierra y Libertad". When you translate text from a foreign language Wikipedia you should provide attribution to the original authors in your edit summary and by adding a translation tag to the talk page, as I have done in this instance. This is a Wikipedia requirement to conform to its copyright obligations. Thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey G
Thanks for doing the infobox on United Voices of the World, I have tried to update the logo today and wonder if there's an easy way to avoid the permissions/copyright hoops. In theory I can have someone edit the website and upload the logo on a blank page and state that it's cool to republish
Also the membership stats. Box 1 states "3,000 (2020)" and Box 2 states "1,200 (2018)". Is there any way to fix Box 2?
Cheers for your time
Carlos — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlosatUVW (talk • contribs) 18:20, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks again. There is in fact published info in the FT saying 3,000 members: https://www.ft.com/content/576c68ea-3784-11ea-a6d3-9a26f8c3cba4
Can we quickly sort out the unbalanced tag? What needs to be changed? Thanks
-C — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlosatUVW (talk • contribs) 14:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
OK, sounds good. I'll do my best with revising the existing text and continue to expand the page in the coming weeks. Will be in touch again soon. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlosatUVW (talk • contribs) 17:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
I've created a few new sections, and think we're ready to start looking at the balance/bias. Could you take a couple of minutes to scan the page and copy me a couple of glaring examples, to give me a general idea of what needs to change? Also need some help with the infobox - the aforementioned 3,000 members and link needs to replace the old figure which has an invalid citation. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlosatUVW (talk • contribs) 11:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for translating the article Higinio Carrocera Mortera!
(t · c) buidhe 04:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
The article cites "Peruga Guerrero 1998", "Jordi Planellas 2013", and "Segalàs 2012", but no such source are listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script (explained at Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors) to highlight such errors in the future. Thanks, Renata (talk) 03:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! Similar issue with Enric Pérez i Farràs: citing "Romero 1994" and "Alexander 2007" (is Alexander supposed to be vol 2 of the work cited in bibliography?) Renata (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Can you also clarify what edition of "Engel" (2005 or 1999) is cited in 70th Mixed Brigade and 147th Mixed Brigade. The two articles cite the work with different years but same ISBN. 18:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Josep Negre i Oliveras, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 16:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
(t · c) buidhe 01:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Battle of Vámospércs. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 5#Battle of Vámospércs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Battle of Yambol. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 5#Battle of Yambol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Battle of Puigcerdà. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 5#Battle of Puigcerdà until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Please add full cite for "Pecellín 1979". Also, please do install the script to highlight such errors. Thanks, Renata (talk) 05:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Also 24th Division (Spain) is missing "Zaragoza 1983". Renata (talk) 01:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
re: your edit to the list of drafts – this page doesn't see much activity (and I think it makes sense to retire eventually) but for now, you might get more activity on your request if you post directly to WT:@. czar 06:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi I’ve just reviewed Maksim Matveevich Cherednyak. Thanks very much for creating this very interesting article. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tactical unity. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Tactical unity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst
Thank you for creating Socialistenbond.
User:JJPMaster, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I have added the template ((R from alternative language)) to your page Socialistenbond in order to specify where the redirect comes from. Thank you!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|JJPMaster))
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your work. Please note that years (and other chronological items) are not generally linked on en.WP. Nor are common words. Tony (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Estonian punk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 19:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Anarchism in Costa Rica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/angel-cappelletti-anarchism-in-latin-america. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 12:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Anarchism in Nicaragua requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/angel-cappelletti-anarchism-in-latin-america. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Anarchism in Panama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/angel-cappelletti-anarchism-in-latin-america. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Anarchism in Uganda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, just wanted to let you know that I reviewed your article Anarchism in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Great article, thank you for your contributions. All the best, CentreLeftRight ✉ 19:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Please stop adding the former country inboxes to Indonesia articles. The liberal democracy period, Guided democracy, the New Order were political eras in Indonesia, not countries. The country of Indonesia still exists. Thank you. Regards Davidelit (Talk) 14:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Antti Rautiainen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. The issue is, two of the current citations are bad links, which leaves only a single citation. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or ping me and I'll be glad to have another look. Onel5969 TT me 18:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of stateless societies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
LukeSurl t c 15:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
The article cites "AGMAV et al." but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]]
to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 03:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
The Anarchist Barnstar | ||
Thanks for all the work to anarchist related wikipedia. SP00KYtalk 14:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC) |
Hi, Grnrchst sorry for making this public but there is no private messaging feature here and I did not know where else to say it, There was somebody in a social media anarchist group a couple of days ago calling you out specifically for your work on List of anarchist communities, probably someone involved in an edit dispute there, and accusing you of being a Marxist who uses Wikipedia with the malicious intent to malign anarchist topics here. This is all insane sounding and whatever ideology you may or may not hold is irrelevant I know but I just thought you should be aware as it may result in brigading of the article mentioned or others that you have put (a lot of good) work into. SP00KYtalk 18:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Revolutionary Confederation of Anarcho-Syndicalists, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Political opening. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Political opening until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
Fot your amazing work and your articles you created in relationship to anarchism, seriously great job, I was actually intending to create some of the pages you created but was to lazy. Des Vallee (talk) 21:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC) |
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Anarchism in Africa. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Ivan Markov (Ataman), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Inter-provincial autonomy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 17:39, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Free Caucasus Committee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Lucien Tronchet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 14:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Jing Meijiu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 17:20, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antti Rautiainen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
I've moved your article Federation of Resistance Societies of the Spanish Region to draftspace. This is because the article currently does not have sufficient reliable sources to remain published. Please make sure to read our guideline on reliable sources. Once your article has sufficient sourcing, feel free to submit it for review, or if you are confident, move it back to its original location. If you have any questions or would like any help, feel free to contact me! Elli (talk | contribs) 15:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
czar 12:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Intercommunalism, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zoozaz1 talk 17:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spicy (talk) 13:06, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Hello, Grnrchst. Elite panic, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for editing anarchism in Brazil. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC) |
Hello! Your submission of Elite panic at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jpatokal (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Benjamim Mota, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Edgar Rodrigues, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:20, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
On 3 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elite panic, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during disaster events, elites will typically shift the focus away from disaster relief towards measures of command and control, a behaviour referred to as elite panic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elite panic. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elite panic), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello Grnrchst,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Parviz Nikkhah for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communist Party (British Section of the Third International), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holt.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ivan Markov (Ataman), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Inter-provincial autonomy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Free Caucasus Committee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Southern Society of the Decembrists, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Southern Society of the Decembrists where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inter-provincial autonomy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jing Meijiu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rusalkii (talk) 16:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Hello! Your submission of Going to the People at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bowlhover (talk) 01:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:South Asia topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:East Asia topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Central Asia topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Western Asia topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huliaipole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Verbiv.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pronouncement of Lacy and has thus listed it at redirects for discussion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 23#Pronouncement of Lacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
On 27 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Going to the People, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1874, thousands of Russian students "[went] to the people" in order to agitate the peasantry towards socialism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Going to the People. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Going to the People), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jing Meijiu".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antti Rautiainen".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
The article Zhang Minquan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Only covered in brief in one source (Ishikawa) so is lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 17:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Azariqa, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 19:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexandrovsk.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benjamim Mota, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edgar Rodrigues, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
The Anarchist Barnstar | ||
For your amazing work improving Ukrainian anarchist articles!—blindlynx 20:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Category:Vietnamese anarchists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benjamim Mota".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edgar Rodrigues".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
an email me here about a Signpost matter?
Thanks,
Smallbones(smalltalk) 01:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for great interview https://www.thecommoner.org.uk/an-interview-the-anarchist-wikipedia-editor-g/
Bluerasberry (talk) 21:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Free Caucasus Committee".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Emilian Makhno has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The references in this article inherit notability from this person's brother, Nestor Makhn. That he was shot in mistaken indentity of hisbrother does not give notability. The references do not address the biography of this person.
Given the mandatory requirements for Biography WP:NBIO, the references in this article do not address the notability of this person. Notability is not inherited from his brother.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 06:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilian Makhno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Whiteguru (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I went to send you an email but looks like you don't have one specified. I had found a comic about Makhno while digging through some other files and thought you might be interested. I'll leave a link up for a few days in case you'd like to take a peek. czar 17:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Well sourced article (Voldemar Antoni)
(t · c) buidhe 03:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Revolution period in Indonesia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Revolutionary Mexico and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 9#Revolutionary Mexico until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Furius (talk) 18:31, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1931 disestablishments in Korea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1930s disestablishments in Korea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tambov Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Past and Present.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nestor Makhno you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of UnknownVolin -- UnknownVolin (talk) 21:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Do you consider Ukrainian and Western MSM as reliable source then? That page has no reason to exists unless you live in a fantasy world where "Ghost of Kyiv" is real. Continuation of that page is an embarrassment for wikipedia, even tho it has already lost all of it credibility 5.129.219.95 (talk) 19:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your excellent work, in maintaining and creating anarchist, and anarchist related articles on Wikipedia. Des Vallee (talk) 19:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC) |
@Grnrchst I thought I would write you direct to ask how a article move exactly works. Am I correct that after the 11 day period a mod does the actual move based on the consensus achieved in the discussion? By the way, I don't know if you noticed but I changed the proposed move from Nykyfor Hryhoriev to Nykyfor Hryhoriv. I hope this was allowed. If not, I apologize.
Another question I have is what is the goal we are trying to achieve? Is it to provide a historically accurate transliteration, a transliteration based on the currently accepted Ukrainian spelling, or the most commonly used variant in English (which would be the current Russian variant)? The answers would be different in each case, being: Nykyfor Hryhoriv, Nykyfor Hryhoriev, and Nikifor Grigoriev. This is where some of my confusion comes from and maybe also some of differences of opinion appearing in the thread. Honestly, I'm fine with Hryhoriv, Hryhoriev, or even leaving it as russified Grigoriev. The only variant I'm totally opposed to is using Matvii as the first name, which is ahistorical and as far as I know is based on a rumoured nickname. Any help clarifying these questions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! UnknownVolin (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
@Grnrchst I read over your Eichenfeld article. It is very well written and balanced so far imo. I just made a few language changes and very minor corrections here and there. If you feel any need to be discussed we can take it to the talk page. UnknownVolin (talk) 06:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
The article Nestor Makhno you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nestor Makhno for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of UnknownVolin -- UnknownVolin (talk) 06:41, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thnx for the help! ADHD makes me miss the tiny details so thnx so much for your help with the infoboxes! Chefs-kiss (talk) 17:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria Lacerda de Moura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copacabana.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maria Lacerda de Moura you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
The article Maria Lacerda de Moura you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Maria Lacerda de Moura for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 11:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Halyna Kuzmenko you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
The article Maria Lacerda de Moura you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Maria Lacerda de Moura for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 22:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
The article Halyna Kuzmenko you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Halyna Kuzmenko for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Good work! ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 22:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC) |
On 30 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Halyna Kuzmenko, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Halyna Kuzmenko promoted the Ukrainization of the Makhnovist movement, successfully increasing the use of the Ukrainian language by Russian speakers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Halyna Kuzmenko. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Halyna Kuzmenko), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Green Editathon — October '22 | ||
Thank you for your excellent contributions to GA nominations Maria Lacerda de Moura, Halyna Kuzmenko and Teresa Mañé and to GA reviews for Nellie McClung, Jennie Scott Griffiths and Marcela Revollo at the WiG Wildcard Edition editathon! Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 14:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Father (honorific), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batko.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Grnrchst, thank you for your assistance in reviewing at WP:Good article nominations. When you pass a nomination, please remember to add it to the appropriate list of Wikipedia:Good articles. All steps that should be taken are listed at WP:GAN/I#PASS. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, CMD (talk) 08:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Grnrchst. Thank you for your work on Starobilsk agreement. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Very nice job on this article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Onel5969))
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Onel5969 TT me 14:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Volin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Krisgabwoosh -- Krisgabwoosh (talk) 01:20, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Volin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Volin for comments about the article, and Talk:Volin/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Krisgabwoosh -- Krisgabwoosh (talk) 23:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social anarchism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist society.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
For all your tireless work on verifying and streamlining the Anarchism theory articles. -- asilvering (talk) 03:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anarcha-feminism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mass movement.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Platformism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mass movement.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Grnrchst, I would like to write something more about the trade unionism in China, a big part of it is driven by the anarchism during the 1920s, so I would like to know if you have any plans/suggestions about it. Many thanks in advance. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 07:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
The Anarchist Barnstar | ||
Awarded for your work verifying and formatting the references of the article Makhnovshchina. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 14 February 2023 (UTC) |
The Workers' Barnstar | ||
This user has shown great editing skills in improving articles related to Communism or Socialism. | ||
this WikiAward was given to Grnrchst by Cdjp1 (talk) on 14:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC) |
Hello, I have some better photos of Helene Minkin. My email is shrackmill@gmail.com. I am the great granddaughter of Rose (the youngest sister) 2601:182:D80:7CD0:D8C7:40EC:76AB:6667 (talk) 18:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Teresa Mañé you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Morogris -- Morogris (talk) 21:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Aleksandr Ge is a really good page. You should be proud of it. Well done. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC) |
The article Teresa Mañé you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Teresa Mañé and Talk:Teresa Mañé/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Morogris -- Morogris (talk) 04:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
The article Teresa Mañé you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Teresa Mañé for comments about the article, and Talk:Teresa Mañé/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Morogris -- Morogris (talk) 16:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
On 2 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Volin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Jewish anarchist Volin refused to flee Nazi-occupied France as he believed that a revolution would follow the liberation of France? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Volin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Volin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 16,260 views (677.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
On 3 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Teresa Mañé, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first secular school in Catalonia was founded by the anarcha-feminist Teresa Mañé? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Teresa Mañé. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Teresa Mañé), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
anarchists
Thank you for quality articles about revolution and anarchism and its people over the centuries, such as Athenian Revolution, Communities of People in Resistance, Yosif Gotman, Volin and Teresa Mañé, for excellent edit summaries such as "Feel free to reinstate if rewritten to be clearer", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2826 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Huge thanks for dramatically expanding the FEJUVE article and providing a nice format. Really informative and a useful general introduction. Bryce Springfield (talk) 01:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC) |
Hi my friend. I hope you are fine. I have removed a lot of unreferenced information. The new page review is one of the last approval stages, so when I see a page like this with a large amount of unreferenced information, and no ((In use))
tag to show that the page is undergoing a major build, I tend to err on the side of caution and remove the unreferenced information. The easiest solution is for you to add the tag to indicate the page is still under construction (if it is). This prevents me and other editors from editing the page until the process is complete and the tag is removed. Please assume good faith of me, as I do of you. By all means add the information again when you can add the references. I'm sure that it will become an awesome page in no time. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:45, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The bit you reverted is related to Fossano and the resulting life without parole sentencing. So why do you think it in the wrong place? Where would you put it? Ffaffff (talk) 08:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gaetano Bresci you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 16:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Gaetano Bresci you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gaetano Bresci and Talk:Gaetano Bresci/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 17:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Gaetano Bresci you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gaetano Bresci for comments about the article, and Talk:Gaetano Bresci/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 14:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
On 9 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gaetano Bresci, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before assassinating Umberto I of Italy, Gaetano Bresci spent most of the day eating ice cream? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gaetano Bresci. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gaetano Bresci), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 9,853 views (821.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, Grnrchst, and thanks for your recent biographies of women. It looks as if you would be a useful member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. Feel free to sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mollie Steimer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Mollie Steimer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mollie Steimer and Talk:Mollie Steimer/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Mollie Steimer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mollie Steimer for comments about the article, and Talk:Mollie Steimer/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elena Mikhnenko you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 11:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Elena Mikhnenko you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Elena Mikhnenko and Talk:Elena Mikhnenko/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 20:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Elena Mikhnenko you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elena Mikhnenko for comments about the article, and Talk:Elena Mikhnenko/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 12:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the ((Ctopics/aware)) template.