This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hi, Recently you are reverting my edits in Draft: Tiruchirappalli metropolitan area, that I have nominated for deletion. I nominated this article for speedy deletion because the main Article is also available Tiruchirappalli metropolitan area, there is no need to have a draft with a exact name and content, hope you can understand can I nominate again for deletion? Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 08:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, and I've deleted, but next time please specify the actual reason; G2 obviously did not apply. Materialscientist (talk) 08:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 08:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Materialscientist, You deleted the article Draft:Syntechno (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) on the due to the 'G11'. This was the second version, which I completely rewrote in order to remove all signs of advertising, and added only the facts in an encyclopedic way. This article was written in exactly the same way as other companies from the list of laboratory diamond manufacturers (example , Apollo Diamond Gemesis Scio Diamond Technology Corporation ) and it seems to me that the removal of the only large company from Russia looks at least strange. It is made according to the same encyclopedic templates as other articles (despite the fact that in other articles there are much more advertising texts). I am not exaggerating its importance, but this company is one of the largest in the country and the only public company in Russia supported by the government (as indicated in 9 authoritative sources). Could you explain exactly what things seemed to you to be advertising, and whether it is necessary to create a new version? Best regards, Igor erferger (talk) 10:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Materialscientist, I created a page for Alturki Holdings for the first time. It's not advertising as it's mentioned in the reason. This is a well known Holding Company in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and hence I created a page for it after researching it well. Mufaddalboxon (talk) 11:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC) Mufaddal[reply]

??? Confused what happened/is happening... Why did you delete the talk page and not the main page (not that I want you to but was there really some "unambiguous advertising" there that someone else placed? Couldn't that particular revision just be removed without having to delete the whole talk page. And there's still a speedy tag on the article.) Very confused... Ps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Basilico%27s 🤦‍♂️Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP's sole contribution has been to speedy the article. Anti anti vaxxer?!🤣 Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno about the IP's motivation, but generally I'm reluctant to delete an article based on IP's tag. Not that there's any policy that pevents an IP from speedy tagging an article ... In any event, I declined the G11 tag. I did not restore the Talk page because I didn't want to undo Materialscientist's action without understanding more about what happened, but there is a DYK going on, and unless the article is deleted, the record of that DYK should be allowed to remain on the article's Talk page, not that I'm really familiar with the DYK process.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Restaurant articles almost always balance on the edge of deletion, as promos or due lack of notability. This one is well written, so I didn't delete it and left for a 2nd look. Talk page deletion was an error that I've fixed. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 14:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I sort of realised that about restaurant articles--tough to toe the line. Thanks for the compliment though, I do what I can :) Kingoflettuce (talk) 06:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This may be a strange request-comment. I saw this article, and thought that it didn't satisfy biographical notability, and was working on an AFD. It was a poorly written stub, and an article should speak for itself, which this one did not. However, I was then checking the references by Google Translate. What I found is that two of them state that he received an award for a short film. I don't think that it looks like a major award, so I don't think that it satisfies notability. At about this point another reviewer tagged it for G7, and then you deleted it as G7. I disagree with G7, although I think it should be deleted at AFD. I think that the film award is a credible claim of significance, except that his flack doesn't know how to write a decent stub that will pass the credible claim of significance bar. So should it be restored only to go to AFD? Robert McClenon (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my early draft work while I am in the process of editing it. Please help show me where is the log so that I can save an off-line copy of my work. Thanks. It was here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PDS6502/sandbox

User:PDS6502 - Admins never restore copyvio. And you know where you copied it from. Put it in your own words before you put it in your sandbox. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These were my own words. Actually, my Dad's own words and my own typing through dictation (Dad has glaucoma and can hardly see to use computer anymore). We did not copy any of this original material from anywhere, we were creating draft in place, on the fly, in the sandbox, with hope of comradely collaboration to help us wiki editing novices. Surely would have been nice for a warmer reception for us newbies. Feel so hurt and saddened with the reception we've since received.

If you can please block ip "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:1700:8641:2FA0:180B:148A:4E92:6B9C" I believe this ip is evading blocked User (Dariuskantihero) here are the edits from 2600:1700:8641:2FA0:180B:148A:4E92:6B9C and blocked user Dariuskantihero This ip (2600:1700:8641:2FA0:180B:148A:4E92:6B9C) is clearly a direct block evasion of Dariuskantihero

2600:1700:8641:2FA0:180B:148A:4E92:6B9C https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Survivor_Series_(2006)&oldid=1038806930

Dariuskantihero https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hell_in_a_Cell_(2021)&oldid=1028358227

This is clearly the same person that created the user Dariuskantihero. Chip3004 (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello !!

Greetings,

How have you been ?

I created a page by the name of Pandit Vishwanath, this is my first article kindly help me to rectify my mistakes and help me to publish the page. Pandit vishwanath is an excellent artist, his voice touches the soul, if you have not heard about him i request you to kindly watch some videos on you tube.

i humbly request you to kindly help me to create his page and publish it.

regards

Hi, where is my draft please? speedy for what? i want to contest the nomination but where is the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion"? this is very unfair and I do not understand why you did this. ברטוביניו (talk) 07:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, you have deleted my draft and im trying to contest it but you are not anwering. please undelete it and restore the draft and alow me to contest the deletion which is unjust in my opinion and the reasons i believe arent right. I thing forbes, vouge and the other source in the draft are enough and also there is no advertising in the draft - if you see some, please indicate them and it will be fixed. I have consulted 2 editors as well and they agree with me but you deleted it without a way to do anything. Please help asap! ברטוביניו (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've undeleted it, so that another admin could have a look. Materialscientist (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but it was dleleted after a few minutes with no reason, can you help and please restore the draft to me so i can have it? becuase i cannot see it? ברטוביניו (talk) 14:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask the deleting admin. Materialscientist (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My page was deleted with speedy deletion under section G11. And it says my page promotes company,group etc and I need to rewrite it to be considered. Can you please explain the flaws with my content so that I can correct it accordingly.

ThanK you

Anu380 (talk) 11:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was working on my article for 3 hours why would you delete it?????? Lbj23goat (talk) 13:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I am not Materialscientist, so I do not know why this article was deleted, however, it is required to have discussions on Wikipedia. All caps is like yelling, and should almost never be done. Starship SN20 (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning,

Hope you are well.

I don't understand why the page Ritamendozag had been deleted, it was a draft that I was working on it. This contest is about nonprofit foundation information, with the intention to let the public know about its existence, not to intent to promote or sell anything. I am not sure if the problem was that I created a Spanish language version of it or it's something else. All the content is original.

Can you please let me know how I can fix this situation?

Best Rigards

Hi, you have just deleted page Jay Prakash for (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject) reason. page was a tag with 'under construction' and I was expanding the article. Jay Prakash has received the Wikimedians of the Year 'Tech Innovator' award for the year 2021^[1] today and I can also see other award recipient pages, can you please help me to understand why this 'A7' is applicable to Jay Prakash page only?, Thanks -Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 19:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain your deletion of Kinta Utara (federal constituency) per A1 and A7? I am struggling to see how the page fit under either of the criteria, given that there was sufficient context and a constituency is not a "real person, individual animal, commercial or non-commercial organization, web content, or organized event". It was a bad article, no question about it. But it did not fit those criteria and did not deserve to be speedily deleted. If another criterion applied, please point to those criteria. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Look, it was a 7-word article, with no references, a possible hoax created by a sock (puppet or master) on a defunct federal constituency. What do you want to do with it? Materialscientist (talk) 04:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not use the wrong criteria? You're far more experienced than me: if it was sufficiently blatant G3 could have been used (though not in this instance) and G5 could have been used if it was in violation of a ban/block (I didn't make a note of who wrote it, so can't be sure). A PROD would probably have been appropriate, but A1 and A7 were not. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just re-created Draft:I am in love with the imposter from among us, god i just want to suck on his nipples so bad. Time for a speedy block? 10mmsocket (talk) 08:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just blocked 120.29.97.74, but I see you previously blocked 120.29.97.74/32. Did you specifically include the /32 for some reason? If nothing else, it seems to be confusing the "Strike out usernames that have been blocked" gadget. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is an annoying bug in Wiki software, which is being resolved: we can't block an IP if it is autoblocked (due to a block on an account that edited from that IP). Adding /32 is a temporal solution. Materialscientist (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I remember seeing that. I even opened T288587 on it :-) I just didn't connect that the /32 was the workaround. Oh, but wait. I did manage to block it without the /32. Maybe that just means the autoblock expired by the time I got to it? My brain hurts. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just updated T287798 with some of this. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Materialscientist! It looks like you blocked User:Bhm yashwanth 765 as a sockpuppet but something seems to have gone wrong as they are still able to create articles. They created Draft:B H M Yashwanth today despite being blocked. Thanks. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:13, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you deleted my article Blui. I believe this was wrong and here is the evidence to support it. Blui is the mascot for the startup company ReMeLife. You can find evidence of the companies existence on remelife.io, remelife.com and remindmecare.com. On remelife.io you can see Blui flying in his spaceship at the bottom.

I believe that is enough proof that he is a part of the company but just incase I will continue with more evidence. There are three videos on the remelife youtube channel that he is a part of. The first is a video showing his journey that can he found here. The second is him landing, and can be found here. The third is him popping up at the end of a meet the team video that can be found here.

My final pieces of evidence are from the remelife subreddit which can be found here. As you can see, Blui is at the forefront of the subreddit with him being included on the banner. Him in his spaceship is also the profile picture of the subreddit. You can also find multiple posts that he is a part of. The first being a link to one of the YouTube videos, which you can find here. Another is, again, a link to a youtube video that Blui was in, which can be found here.

My only other point is that perhaps you thought that I was trying to pass of Blui as a real alien but in the first line I clarify that he is a fictional alien and the mascot for remelife. If you want that to be clearer then please let me know how you want it to be disclosed

Thanks!

I noticed you deleted a stub I had created about Arturo Calle. I created the article with two facts aiming to demonstrate his notability backed by two independent good references. I would like to continue to develop the article, please let me know what you think would address the concern and undelete the article. Do you have concern over the notability of the subject or is it that you think it needs more content to satisfy NPOV? Alan.ca (talk) 13:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored your article at User:Alan.ca/Arturo Calle. Notability aside, it was written in an unencyclopedic, promotional tone. Materialscientist (talk) 13:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a difficult situation when you want to make a small start on a BLP, I assumed the primary point was to highlight why the person is notable. I am not sure what I am going to do if all the sources on the man are positive. Can you give me some guidance on what I need to make an acceptable small stub about him? I have no need to promote the man, just found out he is a notable person in Colombia and wanted to help out by getting an article started about him. Alan.ca (talk) 20:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please Block Twistedriott, what Twistedriott has been doing is for example is changing content from summerslam 2016 is match5 Charlotte Flair defeated Sasha Banks (c) to Mickie James defeated Charlotte Flair (c), This user has received Final Warning which i warned Twistedriott that next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the Edit Summary and Twistedriott may be blocked without further Warning, See this below

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WrestleMania_32&oldid=1039201015 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roadblock:_End_of_the_Line&oldid=1038551721 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Royal_Rumble_(2017)&oldid=1038549949 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SummerSlam_(2016)&oldid=1039203995 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_WWE_Raw_Women%27s_Champions&oldid=1039204429 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_WWE_SmackDown_Women%27s_Champions&oldid=1039205533 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brie_Bella&oldid=1039204647

Clearly this User appears to ignore Warnings, Changes content from Wrestling Articles, Adds false information and Continues to do it even after many users including me had to revert Twistedriott's edits. Twistedriott is getting on my nerves because the user continues to do the same thing everyday despite Multiple Warnings from other editors. Chip3004 (talk) 18:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kinta Utara (federal constituency). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there Materialscientist can you moved Draft:Tropical Storm Fred (2021) to mainspace thank you HurricaneEdgar 09:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done thank you HurricaneEdgar 09:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I recently created a draft about Ebstar ^[1] who is a DJ at Spinnin Records sublabel and it was speedily deleted with the reasons being its promotional stuff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ebstar_(Zimbabwean_DJ) There were over 12 citations and references here and I kindly ask for a review as I didn't intentionally promote this fellow,,, i simply cited official sources such as Genius & Spinnin Records as well as Apple Music for the discograhy. Please kindly point out where its promotional because i wrote this with transparency for a client, quoting and citing proven sources. You can put the article back in the draft space and i edit it again (after you clearly state where this is promotional so i remove. Facts are facts but i am willingly to conform the article to your requirements. I'm willing to ensure transparency and getting this page up for my client. I put a lot of work here and i hope you understand and help out

Please help Ebstar EMT2001 (talk) 17:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I wrote an entry under Draft: Artiplanto. It was recommended for speedy deletion and was deleted before I could edit it.

All promotional language has been removed. All unverified claims. It should be good to go. Please review. Thanks so much.

hey don´t delete official Websiteses on Wikipedia.

I would like to give you a heads up that Twistedriott has been Disruptive Editing in these article- List of WWE Raw Women's Champions, WWE Raw Women's Championship, List of WWE SmackDown Women's Champions, Roadblock: End of the Line, Hell in a Cell (2016) and Hell in a Cell (2017). It appears that Twistedriott ignores warnings and continues to do the same thing every day, I had enough of Twistedriott's Disruptive Editing, if Twistedriott continues to do it after being blocked and once the block expires I'm sure that 100% sure that Twistedriott will come back and do the same thing over and over every day. If you want to extended page protect these articles-List of WWE Raw Women's Champions, WWE Raw Women's Championship, List of WWE SmackDown Women's Champions, Roadblock: End of the Line, Hell in a Cell (2016) and Hell in a Cell (2017) then i am ok with that. Chip3004 (talk) 15:24, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Materialscientist--please have a look at User_talk:216.170.48.162#August_2021. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Materialscientist, you haven't responded: please see that same page for my explanation. I see that you don't see pings--that's unfortunate. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry, I've missed why you invited me there. Now I see. Feel free to lift or amend my block at will - it was likely caused by an AIV report UW Dawgs, which I didn't analyze in detail. Materialscientist (talk) 16:52, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Materialscientist,

You recently deleted this as a CSD G13 but it was not eligible yet for this deletion criteria. Please, with any draft or user page tagged G13, check the edit history of the page to ensure that it hasn't been edited by a human editor in the past six months. Some new editors assume any draft can be deleted with a G13 tag but if the page has been recently edited by a human being (since, well, February 19, 2021), it is not eligible for deletion under this criteria. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Was an incorrectly labelled talk archive. Created the correct archive and did a copy/paste. This page is now an orphan and duplicates the talk archive created. This CSD you have reverted doesn't have Talk in the page name. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I tried to revert a large deletion edit to the above article, but I couldn't because a message said there was a link to a Wikipedia blacklist site. This is too technical for me. Can you help? Thanks Denisarona (talk) 07:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your help. Denisarona (talk) 07:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are a star. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

🍺 The main man1997 (talk) 10:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have been struggling with vandalism on the English Wikipedia for a while. Can you put me in the "rollback" user group? Thanks. ×Elvorix^talk 12:13, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elvorix: Have you tried tools like RedWarn and Twinkle? (Also, apply for rollback at WP:RFP/R) - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 13:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"toxchat" is an TLA infesting a bunch of instant-messaging and related software. Too wide a range to block if I recall. I don't think there's an SPI filed yet, will take care of that detail tomorrow. DMacks (talk) 03:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Materialscientist. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.Clovermoss (talk) 00:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like you didn't actually set the block. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 05:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

It looks like you meant to block Onejokeaway instead? I have gone ahead and unblocked Phenolla. Sro23 (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Adtually I don't understand how the block ended up on Phenolla. Apologies. Materialscientist (talk) 05:37, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MaterialsScientist,

I object to your deletion of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Politics/Ideology. I gave that some consideration, and the withdrawal is worth recording, and G7 did not apply. Please restore it. SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Materialscientist, hello? SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I object to your objection. No, really, MarshallKe had a reason to delete that page; start your own if you wish to continue. Materialscientist (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What was MarshallKe’s reason? And then, in any case, it was not G7 eligible (“the only substantial content of the page was added by its author” was not true). He was in a position to Withdraw and request a speedy close, not to remove all history of the discussion. These “delete all non-project-focused userboxes” MfDs are a developing trend, and the discussion in that MfD was meaningful. So please, reverse the improper G7 deletion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Materialscientist (talk) 14:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Do you want to close it? Or courtesy blank it? SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I read MarshallKe’s last post to it, and think courtesy blank. Personally, I don’t know where the community is going with this, but it may be somewhere. SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, original author of the MfD here. The reason it should be deleted is because it is proposing deletion of the wrong page (also I don't know how to properly propose deletion of a bunch of items at the same time, which is the goal). I would like someone more knowledgeable than me to re-create the MfD or whatever post is appropriate and to delete this malformed MfD. MarshallKe (talk) 16:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, perhaps you can block to real vandal, and rev/delete the defamatory content. Thank you, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you restore this? I am the original author of the deletion request and I removed it because it was malformed. MarshallKe (talk) 15:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) looking at the page history, Matsci didn't restore it??? -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 15:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it shows up here MarshallKe (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just needed to rotate my eyeballs slightly upward and read the conversation above MarshallKe (talk) 16:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give a reason for this revert? The editor who added the material (BananaPlant9999) has expressed confusion since no reason was given. (Admittedly, the section was over-heavy with primary sources, but a courtesy explanation to the new user might be in order.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle showed me only one part of their 4-step edit. Materialscientist (talk) 19:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't really clarify the issue. What part of their edit did you think you were reverting, and for what reason? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This. I thought it was unnecessary. Doesn't matter, my revert was in error. Materialscientist (talk) 19:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, admin, I've shocked when you removed Aung Myo Min, a government minister of NUG. Clearly passes WP:NPOL. As I am one of the main editors of Burmese project, I still can't believe my eyes the minister's article was deleted. Government minister is default notable on Wikipedia. It is very one-sided and unresearched. I disagree your decision. p Pls kindly nominate for deletion if you disagree and restore the article if you agree. Thanks. Taung Tan (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Materialscientist (talk) 14:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks admin for your justice.There are strong reliable sources from the international and local major media [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] and many many more. Hello the nominator FULBERT It is bullying and you did nonsense case even you are a senior new page reviewer. Taung Tan (talk) 14:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This should not happen at all. I do not understand yet. I noted that the government ministers and members of Parliament are auto notable on Wikipedia according to my experience on Wiki. It is very over. I want to put this to ANI. Taung Tan (talk) 14:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FULBERT should've dug deeper before he tagged for a speedy deletion; it's totally clear that Aung Myo Min meets NPOL. Regards, Htanaungg (talk) 14:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you reverted an edit by 206.174.197.170 on the said article. They proceeded to remove more content even after you gave out your reason for removing their contribution. Their newer edits aren't balantant vandalism, but they have left profane edit summaries. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 16:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Materialscientist (talk · contribs). The article Atul Raghav should not be deleted. Kindly revert the edit and undelete the article. I know the fact, this page was made by some other user and was deleted earlier due to lack of independent sources because it's hard and takes a lot to show a 16 year old notable and significant personality. Taekwondo is not much highlighted in India but this boy has achieved a lot and is very well known for his game in our nation. Infact, the result of his matches and news coverage are there on internet. Instead of deletion, you can site this article to improve it further but this page should not be speedily deleted.--Divineplus (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Moontime777 (talk) 17:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Materialscientist,

BabyDogeCoin wikipedia page got deleted by you. I am not involved with them in anyway. I just inform people that they help dogs out, i was neautral at that subject.

I want that you know that. I talked before i posted it to @Girth_Summit and it was all fine. Helped me out 96% of writing the texts.

So i really don't know what made you think its a advertisment.

Please put it back. Thank you, have a nice day!

Kind regards, Moontime777

Hi Material Scientist,

I am Tanya's personal assistant and I am simply removing information per her request. Please do not revert any changes.

Thanks

MSc, thanks a lot for helping out with that redirect deletion! Liz warned me that if it doesn't happen more or less instantly, I'm in trouble. ♫ It ain't necessarily so! Thank you, Arminden (talk) 18:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English subtitles for the 20-second sample of Freakum Dress by Beyonce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

You erroneously deleted this page per G3 after someone else had tagged it, but it should have been moved back to TimedText:Beyonce_FreakumDress.ogg.en.srt, from which it was moved erroneously by the creator. This was a plausible good-faith attempt to provide subtitles to this audio file. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck it was be that there!?! 2405:9800:BA31:F6:4C39:B710:9495:1CD5 (talk) 05:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually common practice to place school IPs under such long blocks if the people using them are habitual vandals whose unconstructive behavior leads the IP to get repeatedly blocked.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:44, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The block was for 10 years, but Wiki software changes it according to some calendar, hence 9 years, 364 days, 19 hours, 37 minutes and 12 seconds. Materialscientist (talk) 06:00, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is an older block to this IP with unusual block duration: 4 years, 365 days, 43 minutes and 12 seconds (blocked on 18 October 2012). Why? 2405:9800:BA31:F6:4C39:B710:9495:1CD5 (talk) 06:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason. Input numbers are always simple integers, 5 years in the latter case. Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for deleting and blocking this user and their sock User:Maximumclicks - can you revoke talk page access to Get4abhi please as they continue to add promo there JW 1961 ^Talk 17:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re this, I think that this diff makes it fairly clear that we're dealing with this LTA here. I already asked someone who may know better, but I think he's already logged off for tonight. Would you mind having a look? Thanks! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:44, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of whether they are socking, I've indeffed them without TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping you could restore it as the group has had more releases since the deletion of the first template. In the previous deletion discussion it was said they should have at least three or four releases which they now do. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 01:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Materialscientist (talk) 04:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a dab page, it was a set index page. Set index pages can exist even if they are full of redlinks. Unfortunately users are not aware of this, nominate them for deletion, and I can not always react quickly. Could you please restore the page. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Uspekhov. Materialscientist (talk) 10:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spasibo.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Infobox settlement isn't a good representation of the old Russia governorates. So I changes it into Infobox country and removed some parameters. I didn't add anything because I didn't have enough time and was planning to come back later.

Thanks CarrotandParrot (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MaterialsScientist,

I object to your deletion of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:StartLife. Many pages on wikipedia concern information about organizations, both commercial and non-profit. I see organizations similar to StartLife with a wikipedia page, including Y Combinator and HighTechXL. I was writing the page in the same line as Y Combinator. Deletion of this page seems highly random if not discriminative. Please restore the page. Thanks (Brammos (talk) 13:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC))[reply]

I've indeffed the user as a promotion-only account.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Materialscientist, I see that you deleted B. Riley Financial for G11. I tried to follow Wikipedia's guidelines about tone and neutrality carefully, and I am at a loss to identify what from the draft was problematic. How can I see some examples of what was wrong? I am not asking for general guidelines about G11, but for examples from the B. Riley draft. As an administrator, can you help? Thank you. WalksInWelcome (talk) 14:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

as I placed the deletion request, and they have been insistently pinging me and a somewhat less experienced but very responsible editor about it, I replied on their user talk page, calling their attention to WP:COI and WP:PAID. DGG ( talk ) 05:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i saw there was a 'speedy deletion' of this page i just created. Reason said it was promotional use. I'm not sure what's deemed as promotion here. It's my page. I was just adding it to wikipedia here. How can I get it put back or put back to some specified guideline? 24.43.81.166 (talk) 19:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My two cents. First, it's not your page. If you were writing this for the Encyclopedia Britannica, you'd have to submit it to be reviewed by their editorial staff, where they'd either accept, reject, or edit it to suit their needs. If they accept, you'd get paid for it, and they would own it to do with as they please. The only difference here is that nobody is getting paid. Everything you write belongs to Wikipedia. This is why WP:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing exists.

Your company has to pass our WP:Notability guidelines. This means it needs to be written about in multiple WP:Reliable sources that are WP:Verifiable. We write articles in a very formal style with an impassionate tone and a WP:Neutral point of view. While I cannot see the article anymore, things deemed as promotional generally read like advertisements or company brochures rather than encyclopedia articles. The question I would ask is, "Why do you want to create this article?" is it to provide people with a good amount of info about a widely known and talked-about company, such as General Electric, EG&G, or Wal-Mart, or is it to let people know about a company that isn't very well known? That's a rhetorical question, but if the answer is more along the lines of the latter, then the article is promotion.

There is a lot to know about encyclopedic writing and Wikipedia policy and guidelines before you write your first article. My advice is to go to WP:Articles for creation and submit your draft there. Also, please look at our WP:Conflict of interest policy. (Not that you have one, but people rarely just go around creating articles about unknown companies (if this is one) so it begs the question.) Zaereth (talk) 19:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I don't understand though. I made it in this ones image because we follow the same format: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Cup_of_Jo so i'm assuming once i give links from references from other sites that link to us(the one thing i didn't do), that makes it legit? Because other than that, there was nothing different here. Thus my confusion.24.43.81.166 (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That I don't know. I'd need to be able to see the article to give any assessment, I just have Mat's talk page on my watchlist, and try to help out from time to time, because they're usually very busy. Unfortunately, I won't have time myself to look any further. What I can say is that someone thought it was promotional-sounding enough to tag it, and Mat saw fit to delete it on those grounds. Having no reliable sources referenced would be a plenty valid reason to speedy delete.

The "A Cup of Jo Jo" article seems fairly well written, but in my personal opinion it gives very little info about the actual blog, and if it came up for deletion I would probably vote "yes" as it exists in its current state. An article shouldn't end up becoming a psudo-biography, and either way, there should be enough info out there to create a decent, well-rounded article about any subject. Fortunately for you, I don't watch the deletion pages, and a lot of other Wikipedians tend to think this is sufficient. If you can convince Mat that the article should be undeleted and that you plan on improving it, then there's always a possibility it could get moved to draft space, but that's up to them. I advise not trying to recreate it unless you plan on going through the AFC process so you can get all the feedback you need before transferring it to main article-space. Keep in mind that most companies are not notable, although I don't know about this one. (I've never heard of them.) I hope that helps, and good luck. Zaereth (talk) 21:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can you explain me why you revert this change please sir please explin in easy english language https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List%20of%20poets&diff=1040890016 why you revert this change a wikipedia page means this poet is notable so why you revert it

See your talk page. As I mentioned, the person should have an article on this Wiki (English Wikipedia), not on other-language Wiki. Materialscientist (talk) 08:43, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Draft:Deri Lorus (Musician), originally created at Deri Lorus (Musicion), and then moved to draft in evident good faith by another editor. Thanks, 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:90AD:B1E5:CFDA:F2E2 (talk) 08:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Deri Lorus is a popular Tamil musician, I created a article about him but it is deleted, can I create or not, please can you have look at this. Dhaneesh 💙 Ram 10:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest revdel most recent two diffs here. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Turned out there were more than just two diffs, and I made a bit of a half-assed job initially, but I believe it's all done properly now. Let me know if I've missed anything. I've also revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:52, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Thanks! Those too, although when I started the section the most recent two were at James (name) and 2005. I doubt the person exists but reckon those should be RD’d regardless, just in case. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's necessary. If Materialscientist (or another watching admin) disagrees, they can delete them.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to tell you that User:Biggest Fan of Salman Khan is sock puppet of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RealHeroRahul. Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: I think, account is not blocked [8].Princepratap1234 (talk) 18:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you might have noticed, especially based on recent edits made to Antonee Robinson, the IP 217.137.43.101 has gone completely unhinged at me, accusing me, inexplicably, of being "pro-American." I appreciate you reverting their vandalism to Robinson's page as well as your note left on their talk page. I ask that you please help me keep an eye on this IP, and any sockpuppets thereof, as they have gone completely off the deep end about a very minor, broadly established practice across WP:FOOTY. So, again, thanks for the help. Anwegmann (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've just answered a query at WP:HD re the Deri Lotus draft, which you deleted. Is there a possibility that we have found another sock? Mjroots (talk) 08:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I recall CU was inconclusive (by my standards - I am rather conservative in this regard). Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tried finding some supporting references to support the pronunciation you added a few years ago when you overhauled the Morgause page, but I found nothing. I was hoping you could direct me to your source so I can use it elsewhere (using Wikipedia as a reference is bad form, as you know).

Thanks in advance! Mousenight (talk) 03:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I requested Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Easy db for deletion on its talk page because it's blank, and is fully-protected, but you just deleted the talk page. Can you fix this (or notify me if I'm wrong)? ― Qwerfjkltalk 12:23, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I would like to get back the info of the page I created of which you deleted. Thanks

Hi Materialscientist, Please block the user you previously blocked from editing their own talk page. Pachu Kannan (talk) 07:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Annamalai K (BJP) is again created with different name after you deleted. This is also happening in tamil wiki. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Annamalai (I.P.S), https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Annamalai_Kuppusamy Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annamalai k

He is using two accounts also. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=San%C4%81tana_Dharma&diff=1041425326&oldid=1041409165

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=San%C4%81tana_Dharma&diff=1041243289&oldid=1041241428

Again created by same guy with another account Draft:Annamalai K (Bharatiya Janata Party)

Hi, please can you move the File:Salem Spartans logo.png to commons Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 07:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate how do I semi protect articles which spread false information? I came from the takehiro guy whos beng linked to arsenal,Thanks for protecting it mate

Thank you for deleting pages which I have been tagged for CSD! ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN! ^{【Click to Discuss】} 13:58, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You recently deleted the page for this subject citing it was a dup of Muhammad Madni Ashraf Ashrafi Al-Jilani, which is puzzling. Professor Syed Hasan Askari (https://www.professorsyedhasanaskari.com/biography ) and Muhammad Madni Ashraf Ashrafi Al Jilani (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Madni_Ashraf_Ashrafi_Al-Jilani) are two different individuals with no similarities as per their biographies on official website, Sufinama and Wikipedia. Prof. Askari was born in 1901 in Bihar, India while the other one in Utter Pradash, India in 1938. Their photographs are different. One is a historian of medieval India while the later is a religious scholar. Could you please elaborate on your decision? 2603:6011:BF06:DE00:4DFF:B7C0:A055:1891 (talk) 14:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, thanks, someone tried to hijack that page. Materialscientist (talk) 14:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, please help me understand this.

I removed a citation on Cape Town because it was advertising. Should I have reported it instead?

I was told this type of citation is not allowed by Viewmont_Viking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Viewmont_Viking

How is that citation acceptable (Cape Town one I deleted) but the same type of citations I added were not allowed? LandiAfrica (talk) 15:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you recently blocked 86.167.136.77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for a short period. However, they have resurfaced making libelous remarks on the Murder of Milly Dowler page, which I have reverted. They have previously made the same unsourced libel comments on the same page as 81.154.7.173 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 109.156.131.150 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) They appear to be based in the Sidcup, Bexley area of the UK. Trust you will be able to stop their activities. Thanks and regards, David J Johnson (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On further research, I've found they have made almost the same libel as 81.154.67.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 86.167.136.71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 86.130.82.7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), again from the Sidcup/Bexley area of the UK. Looks as though they IP hop for their libel and vandalism. Best regards, David J Johnson (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, where is my draft please? I want to contest the nomination but where is the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion"? This is very unfair and I do not understand why you did this. Please provide the deleted section, so I can repost it with a citation and not just delete it. By the way in the section I have added the content there are a few bullets without citation; why are you not also deleting them? Thank you.

Here are my sources https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/07/scott-dworkin-resistance/

https://www.thedailybeast.com/cash-for-coalition-against-trump-going-into-consultants-pockets-instead https://lawandcrime.com/hashtag-resistance/anti-trump-resistance-group-used-donor-funds-to-enrich-themselves/

https://splinternews.com/meet-the-anti-trump-scam-pac-getting-rich-off-the-resis-1822798967

2600:8805:C980:9400:7C38:A81F:BE91:1B90 (talk) 17:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for blocking that user for vandalism. I was about to warn them for not disclosing that they were being paid when you blocked them. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) (Stupidity by me) 18:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you protect my talk page from IPs? I have been attacked by a looney talking gibberish this week. Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 04:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was trying to report an IP for editing [Wikborg Rein] because the IP belonged to that company. But, I messed up on the talk page, could you help me? --Greatder (talk) 06:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Materialscientist. Could you please reconsider the deletion of this draft? Several editors have contributed, so I don't think G7 applies.

Also, the nominator has moved the article to their sandbox and I suspect that they will try to re-publish the article at some stage. It would be preferable that the working version of the article is this draft, because of attribution and the history of previous reviews. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the author and sole contributor of the draft article using my main account User:Insomniaingest and IP address 80.7.63.144 therefore G7 definitely applies in this case as 99.9% of the article's edits are solely my own contributions. It's my work. Your suspicions and accusations are not relevant to G7 (official Wikipedia policy). Additionally, I removed the draft from my sandbox as I'm not interested in Wikipedia anymore and I already linked the article's Wikipedia Arabic version. Regards, Insomniaingest 08:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that. I agree with Insomniaingest. Materialscientist (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Materialscientist. Insomniaingest (talk) 08:45, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for considering this. If there are no plans to re-publish this article, then there's no issue here. (For the record, there were other contributors to the draft aside from Insomniaingest and the IP address) Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sole other contributor User: Aboodi2007192 was merely copy-pasting my work from other Wikipedia articles. There was no original content by this contributor in the draft article; he was copy-pasting my work. I reverted his copy-paste contributions on the basis that my work was considered promotional/advertising per the AfC reviewer's comments. Insomniaingest (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I AM A SOCKPUPPET OF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HARSH_VARDHAN_SHARMA_%22TARA%22 AND I HAVE CREATED THAT WIKIPEDIA PAGE WITH NAME BRIJ KISHORE SHARMA Mr. Asian (talk) 08:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I not allowed to report any of Sock:SeanJ 2007's user and IP accounts? And why it's all considered unactionable? Is there any other way to block them? - 136.158.42.180 (talk) 10:08, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I was looking through Wikipedia:Database reports/Unusually long user blocks and it looks like you blocked MoonmanKKK3 for 3 years despite their talk page saying indefinite. It also looks Mr.Duck59 has got a similar long block --Nintendofan885^{T&Cs apply} 11:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3 years might make sense in some cases, but I meant indefinite and adjusted the blocks, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks --Nintendofan885^{T&Cs apply} 20:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

213.154.1.196 is a blocked open proxy, but its talk page is being abused. Could talk page access be removed and the edit dealt with? Thanks. TwoTwoHello (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User talk:Smilzcbdgummies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cite the chapter "Aqueous Solution Chemistry of Beryllium" from Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, volume 50, pp 109–172. The volume is edited by A.G.Sykes and A.H. Cowley. I am one of 4 authors of this chapter. I can't find a specific template to use for citing a chapter in a book series such as this. Petergans (talk) 09:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

((cite book|chapter=Aqueous Solution Chemistry of Beryllium|title=Advances in Inorganic Chemistry| volume =50|pages=109–172|editor1= A.G.Sykes |editor2= A.H. Cowley|author1=Lucia Alderighi |author2=Peter Gans|author3=Stefano Midollini |author4=Alberto Vacca|doi=10.1016/S0898-8838(00)50003-8|year=2000|place=San Diego |publisher= Academic Press|isbn=978-0120236503))

Many thanks. Much appreciated. Petergans (talk) 16:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nehtaur&oldid=1023719712 Idilshadansari (talk) 10:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2405:201:8001:8808:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) This is a vandalism only IP range engaged in disruption of Bengali TV related pages with misleading edit summary Ok everytime. 2402:3A80:1C40:C174:9AD5:E111:BD3E:C9C5 (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Materialscientist. The page Umu Obiligbo was tagged for speedily deleting and before I could get to the notification, it was already deleted by you. There was nothing I could have done. Please help restore the article so I can work on it and make the necessary changes. Thanks. Idoghor Melody (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User talk:49.177.6.159

 – Firestar464 (talk) 10:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Materialscientist

I am sorry if my edit was unhelpful, but do you mind explaining why? At least if you left an edit summary along with your reversion, I could possibly learn something.

Anyway, there is still a link that needs disambiguation, now that inoculum has been restored, and if Propagule: "In disease biology, pathogens are said to generate infectious propagules, the units that transmit a disease. These can refer to bacteria, viruses, fungi, or protists, and can be contained within host material. For instance, for influenza, the infectious propagules are carried in droplets of host saliva or mucus that are expelled during coughing or sneezing." is not suitable, could you suggest what would be, from this list, please?

Many thanks. 49.177.6.159 (talk) 15:05, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like prior socks, the same pattern of a new user adding music genres [9][10][11][12] compare to others. 183.171.114.233 (talk) 12:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Materialscientist:, the information about Brian Kenny (sportscaster) wife is already cited under personal life. I didn't add any unsourced info. Same with my edits at Rezendeevil, i added citations there as well. But you removed my edits saying I didn't cite anything, which I did. Hope it's ok for me to add them back. Thank you Jaconsurto (talk) 09:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish Chanchlani is an Indian YouTuber with more than 26M subscribers. I want to write an article but it's protected. Theastitva (talk) 11:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Materialscientist. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.SolutionBoy (talk) 11:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've just contacted you regarding the deletion of an article I had written. I'm hoping to get some feedback on how the article can be re-submitted, as the original was deleted due to 'Unambigous Advertising'. I thought I had done all I could to avoid any hint of this, so would appreciate your feedback. Thanks!

I see that you speedily deleted Help:WikiProjects under WP:G14. Since the page title doesn't end in "(disambiguation)", I can only presume that this is because it was considered one of the "disambiguation pages that disambiguate zero extant Wikipedia pages". I can't see the page anymore, but I don't believe that this was always the case, and imagine that reverting to a previous revision would make the page ineligible for speedy deletion. Can you restore the page so we can discuss it and nominate it for a deletion discussion if necessary? Daask (talk) 14:17, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have blocked Glvckk for what looks to me like one trivial vandalism edit. Is there something I don't know about, such as some meaning to what the editor posted which made it grossly offensive? JBW (talk) 19:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Materialscientist. I rarely approach admins directly, but my request at WP:ANI was timed out, and you have already blocked all the socks of Muhammad Ebad123 (talk · contribs) i.e. Inter Service123 (talk · contribs), KforKarachi) (talk · contribs), ISPR 488 (talk · contribs), ISPR 488 (talk · contribs), ISPR 499 (talk · contribs) and ISPR +92 (talk · contribs)

‎GHQ +92 (talk · contribs) is a blatant sock, still trying to pretend there is a General Muhammad Ebadullah, presumably him in the usual picture. as used on Draft:General Muhammad Ebadullah - could you please block + rev-del - thanks - Arjayay (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to contribute to the ANI discussion about user 47.157.129.133 since you were previously involved in the user's talk page with warnings or notices. 2603:8000:A501:9B00:4425:751C:D9BD:7885 (talk) 04:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Admin's Barnstar
		Thank you for deleting the hoaxes I found while going through Category:Stale userspace drafts. Your help is greatly appreciated! Keep up the great work :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:38, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I was wondering if there were any other users who edited the pages that were deleted at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Assistance_with_going_through_potential_hoaxes_in_stale_userspace_drafts. If so, I think they should be checked that they are not making hoaxes as well. I'm interested in any deleted page that both these two users made, including the non-football ones. So far, I found this user who edited at least one userpage that is a hoax. As I am not an admin, I cannot verify myself that there's no other users editing these pages besides the 3 of them. Thanks! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:12, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Materialscientist. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Igoryu1993.
Message added 09:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the reason the page below was blocked. New to wikipedia and using the sandbox for creating and editing. Did not realize that it would submit the draft before I was ready. I have brand new content, written in my own words with references. Are you able to unblock the page or do I need to create a new one. Appreciate the help. 06:52, 30 July 2021 Materialscientist talk contribs deleted page User:SCI8586/sandbox (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://srcbiosciences.com/about/dr-moutons-biosketch) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCI8586 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you did not follow up regarding the ketchup redirects, I've requested undeletion at RFU now. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't normally deal with things like this so I'm not sure if there's a proper venue, but a new page for Ali mansour was created two days ago. You had deleted the "correctly named" version of the article in July, noting it was created by a globally-banned sock, which is why I'm pinging you. The article doesn't look eligible for speedy deletion for me, so perhaps it should be moved to the "correct" name (and nommed at AfD if appropriate?). Suriname0 (talk) 12:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like User:Blablubbs took care of this. Suriname0 (talk) 12:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I painstakingly added the plot of the beautiful movie The Power of the Dog, and you just removed it in one click. How mean can a person be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.56.223.237 (talk) 08:41, 23 Sep 2021 (UTC)

Materialscientist: The premise you reverted to is found, word-for-word, at IMDB. So if there's a flaw with the IP's plot, we need to find some other text to use to avoid copyvio issues. —C.Fred (talk) 14:26, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Materialscientist - On 12 September you blocked Yashwantbhoj (talk · contribs) for 1 week in the block log, but left a blocked indefinitely notice on his talk page here
I'm not sure which you meant to do, 1 week, or indefinitely, but, whichever, he has resumed mass editing, creating unsuitable/repetitive articles - I'm not sure if it is deliberate vandalism or CIR, but think it needs to stop - please could you to look at it - thanks - Arjayay (talk) 10:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Unblock request from BashurMan

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The said person is currently the Chairperson of District Development Council of District Kulgam. https://www.greaterkashmir.com/editorial/ddc-chairpersons-placed-above-mps-mlas-in-status As clearly you can check the Chairperson are above the MLA's or MP's in the protocol as well Post. So there is a need to be on Wikipedia. Please remove the tag and help me to add the information as per the citation available. Thank you

Hello Materialscientist, Can you protect this page "Upin & Ipin" for 2 weeks, due to disruptive editing by 2401:3C00:18E:9F8A:9D0A:F396:A7AA:5658.

Thank you!

--180.244.167.81 (talk) 13:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 August 2021, the page "The Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers" was deleted due to code A10 (subject already on file). Respectfully, I would like my page restored. The information I wrote up as unique, and it would be a big burden for me to have to recreate it. The page that you quoted as relevant lists the titles of 85 federalist papers, but does not define each. My page defines each one, and it will define all 85 antifederalist papers. I have learned to use the sandbox to create writeups, and if this page can be returned there, it would be greatly appreciated. I will combine the finished product with "The Federalist Papers" or provide a link to the page at the top, so that it won't be an orphan. Thank you.

Lord Milner (talk) 02:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The TV series is currently in production with premiere dates, short description and information about the cast available. I was creating a page for the series based on the new information available but didn't yet publish it when I saw the information about an earlier draft being deleted by you. I'm a noob, so could you please advice if I should submit the page (it has sources etc.) for a review. Thank you. Finney13s (talk) 11:51, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Hope you're well... I think we talked back in Zika days, or something ;) Once upon a time, apparently, there was an athlete named Trevor Bedford. There is also now a virologist, Trevor Bedford (virologist). It seems like they should be flipped, with the virologist and now MacArthur Grant winner as the Primary Topic and the athlete as the one with parens. I poked around for a while and wasn't really sure what the right procedure is. Any suggestions? Chris vLS (talk) 02:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All my many recent attempts to improve the article List of aqueous ions by element are being reverted, without any discussion. Firstly by user:DePiep and more recently by User:YBG. The reasons stated for the reversions are spurious. In particular, YBG appears to think that edits need to be discussed before making them live.

The disagreements are all about layout! I wrote the the itntroduction and it has remained untouched by other editors. I have also checked the entry for every element against cited sources in my possession, also without any dissent. My last attempt can be seen in my sandbox. Petergans (talk) 14:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My perspective is a bit different from Petergans's, specifically:

"Repeated and persistent restoration of disputed edits without consensus" - and in at least one aspect "contrary to consensus".

Contrary to what PG says without any discussion, I have initiated several discussions on the talk page, but PG has been silent in most if not all of them. I have even added a section in the talk page to catalog the consensuses already reached, and invited others to correct me if I have misrepresented any of these things. I am not sure how I could have been more actively involved in facilitating discussion.

Also contrary to what PG says, I believe that edits do NOT need to be discussed before being made. For example, when PG rewrote the introductory material in a way removed the explanations designed to help the layman understand the content of the article, I recognized the issue, but realized that the best way was not to revert, but to improve the content by merging the original layman-oriented material with PG's more recent material that was considerably less accessible. Alas, I have not had the time to do this, but it is still an area where I hope to improve the article.

However, I DO believe that when a bold edit has been reverted, it is necessary to reach a consensus before restoring the bold edit, and the author of that bold edit should ensure that a consensus is reached before restoring the disputed edit. After PG's edit was reverted, no consensus was reached, so those changes should not have been restored. All of this is according to the well-established bold-revert-discuss cycle, which I believe is a useful guideline for collaboration at WP.

I sincerely hope that PG will actively engage with the discussions I have initiated on the article's talk page so that PG's opinions will be taken into consideration as page editors decide the best presentation format. I assume that in the future, PG will wait for page editors to reach a consensus before restoring disputed edits, and also abide by the consensuses reached.

YBG (talk) 21:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My most recent edits were reverted without discussion. Petergans (talk) 10:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Petergans's most recent edit, which changed special:permalink/1048031546 § List to special:permalink/1048110525 § Hydrolysis products of the elements, included these two features (among others):

1. removing the anions from the main table and placing them in a separate table

   Petergans was free to boldly make this edit, but I was also free to revert it. Under the WP:BRD cycle guidelines, discussion follows revert, it does not come before and a consensus needs to be reached before restoring the disputed edit. I started a discussion on the talk page at § Separating anions), pinged the top 10 editors of the article and talk page (14 editors in all), and seven of these editors agree that the anions should be in the main table. No one has voiced any support for separating the anions. Petergans did not participate in the discussion.

2. removing all oxidation states from the main table.

   A consensus had previously been reached and documented in archive 1 at §§ Conclusions re "Table changes"​ and Oxidation numbers to include the oxidation states on every row in the table. Petergans participated in one of these discussions, but every other discussion participant disagreed with him. The consensus having been reached, Petergans was free to begin a new discussion to seek a different consensus, but failing that, should have followed the established consensus.

For ease of reference, I have created a list of consensuses reached and under discussion at the top of Talk:List of aqueous ions by element. I encourage Petergans to follow those that have been established, participate in the current discussions, and start a new discussion thread to change any of them. YBG (talk) 15:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the place argue the merits or otherwise of past changes of article content. My request to user:Materialscientist is to review the repeated occasions of reversions after major changes of content. Petergans (talk) 16:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Much as I appreciate Petergans’ research and contributions, and with respect, as an editor he seem incapable of observing WP:BRD. That is to say, after one of his edits is reverted he seems to be disinterested in the D part of BRD, and attempting to seek consensus. Equally, there is no obligation to seek consensus or for a discussion before boldly editing (or reverting).

I further recall instances of Petergans reverting reverts without attempting to seek consensus, which does not help. All that said, the article has come a long way so since I created it. It needs more work, and if there are any reverts of bold edits on my part I intend to follow BRD. I hope Petergans will be able to do so, too.

@YBG: has been doing a sterling job of attempting to keep things on track. Sandbh (talk) 07:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user has requested unblock; their edit and attempted edits seem pretty mild so I was inclined to give them another shot, but in case I'm missing something, I didn't know if you had any comment about this. Thank you 331dot (talk) 14:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking Deadexcel is fine with me. Materialscientist (talk) 14:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just noticed some odd editing, which may or may not be gaming of extended rights. I think you've dealt with this type of thing before, so I figured I ask you about it. Whether it is rights-gaming or something else, I trust you'll know what to do about it (if anything). Cheers - wolf 21:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nudge ;-) - wolf 07:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately after you blocked A hooman bean for vandalism an IP, 223.237.137.0 made the exact same edit to Changes (Justin Bieber album). Notfrompedro (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]