On the Sizes and Distances (of the Sun and Moon) (Ancient Greek: Περὶ μεγεθῶν καὶ ἀποστημάτων [ἡλίου καὶ σελήνης], romanized: Perì megethôn kaì apostēmátōn [hēlíou kaì selḗnēs]) is widely accepted as the only extant work written by Aristarchus of Samos, an ancient Greek astronomer who lived circa 310–230 BCE. This work calculates the sizes of the Sun and Moon, as well as their distances from the Earth in terms of Earth's radius.
The book was presumably preserved by students of Pappus of Alexandria's course in mathematics, although there is no evidence of this. The editio princeps was published by John Wallis in 1688, using several medieval manuscripts compiled by Sir Henry Savile. The earliest Latin translation was made by Giorgio Valla in 1488. There is also a 1572 Latin translation and commentary by Frederico Commandino.
The work's method relied on several observations:
The rest of the article details a reconstruction of Aristarchus' method and results. The reconstruction uses the following variables:
|Angle between the Moon and the Sun during a half moon (directly measurable)
|Distance from the Earth to the Moon
|Distance from the Earth to the Sun
|Radius of the Moon
|Radius of the Sun
|Radius of the Earth
|Distance from the center of Earth to the vertex of Earth's shadow cone
|Radius of the Earth's shadow at the location of the Moon
|Ratio, d/ℓ (a directly observable quantity during a lunar eclipse)
|Ratio, S/L = s/ℓ (which is calculated from φ)
Aristarchus began with the premise that, during a half moon, the moon forms a right triangle with the Sun and Earth. By observing the angle between the Sun and Moon, φ, the ratio of the distances to the Sun and Moon could be deduced using a form of trigonometry.
From the diagram and trigonometry, we can calculate that
The diagram is greatly exaggerated, because in reality, S = 390 L, and φ is extremely close to 90°. Aristarchus determined φ to be a thirtieth of a quadrant (in modern terms, 3°) less than a right angle: in current terminology, 87°. Trigonometric functions had not yet been invented, but using geometrical analysis in the style of Euclid, Aristarchus determined that
In other words, the distance to the Sun was somewhere between 18 and 20 times greater than the distance to the Moon. This value (or values close to it) was accepted by astronomers for the next two thousand years, until the invention of the telescope permitted a more precise estimate of solar parallax.
Aristarchus also reasoned that as the angular size of the Sun and the Moon were the same, but the distance to the Sun was between 18 and 20 times further than the Moon, the Sun must therefore be 18–20 times larger.
Aristarchus then used another construction based on a lunar eclipse:
By similarity of the triangles, and
Dividing these two equations and using the observation that the Sun and Moon appear the same size to people on Earth, , yields
The rightmost equation can either be solved for or
These equations can be made to appear simpler by expressing the lengths and in terms of the moon's radius as a unit, defining and Then
The above equations give the radii of the Moon and Sun entirely in terms of observable quantities.
The following formulae give the distances to the Sun and Moon in terrestrial units:
where θ is the apparent radius of the Moon and Sun measured in degrees.
It is unlikely that Aristarchus used these exact formulae, yet these formulae are likely a good approximation for those of Aristarchus.
The above formulae can be used to reconstruct the results of Aristarchus. The following table shows the results of a long-standing (but dubious) reconstruction using n = 2, x = 19.1 (φ = 87°) and θ = 1°, alongside the modern day accepted values.
|Sun's radius in Earth radii
|Earth's radius in Moon radii
|Earth-Moon distance in Earth radii
|Earth-Sun distance in Earth radii
The error in this calculation comes primarily from the poor values for x and θ. The poor value for θ is especially surprising, since Archimedes writes that Aristarchus was the first to determine that the Sun and Moon had an apparent diameter of half a degree. This would give a value of θ = 0.25, and a corresponding distance to the Moon of 80 Earth radii, a much better estimate. The disagreement of the work with Archimedes seems to be due to its taking an Aristarchus statement that the lunisolar diameter is 1/15 of a "meros" of the zodiac to mean 1/15 of a zodiacal sign (30°), unaware that the Greek word "meros" meant either "portion" or 7°1/2; and 1/15 of the latter amount is 1°/2, in agreement with Archimedes' testimony.
A similar procedure was later used by Hipparchus, who estimated the mean distance to the Moon as 67 Earth radii, and Ptolemy, who took 59 Earth radii for this value.
Some interactive illustrations of the propositions in On Sizes can be found here:
((cite web)): CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link).