16:4916:49, 18 April 2024diffhist+3
Ant
rv template-breaking change. I don't understand why this breaks the page, so I can't fix it I can just revert. Sorry.Tag: Undo
21:0721:07, 13 March 2024diffhist−216
Peter Pan
→External links: rm a link to Archive.org. That file is a mess, it has the wrong title, the wrong date, etc. It was actually a copy of Peter Pan at Kensington Gardens, but the title and date are of the later 1911 novel!
03:3203:32, 29 February 2024diffhist+31
Voynich manuscript
Undid good faith revision by Nihil novi (talk) - This edit introduced grammatical errors, mixed up the eng-var, and changed "deciphered" to "decrypted", where the former was correct. I could pick and choose the changes, but the non-problematic edits seem matters of taste that are fine either way, so I'll just revert the lot.Tag: Undo
20:5720:57, 15 February 2024diffhist+21
Rubber duck debugging
The removal of the product placement was good, but I can't imagine what NPOV bias the image caption had. It was just reiterating the body of the article.
10 February 2024
05:4605:46, 10 February 2024diffhist−33
Oscillococcinum
When a change to long-standing verbiage is reverted by two unconnected editors, isn't it customary to take it to the talk page instead of just trying again with a different edit summary?Tag: Manual revert
05:4105:41, 2 February 2024diffhist+116
List of light-gun games
Undid revision 1202147496 by ClueBot NG (talk) I think this is the first time in about a decade that I've seen ClueBot make a mistake. According to Google Translate and box-art scans, this obscure game does belong on the list.Tag: Undo
05:2705:27, 2 February 2024diffhist−175
Haptic technology
This picture does not illustrate haptics. (Like most data-gloves, those have no haptics. Haptic gloves are much bulkier.) I was hesitant to edit the article because I have a COI, but come on, I brought this up on the Talk page in 2019. I proposed an alternative photograph that I took myself, but I won't add it to the article myself.
03:5603:56, 3 December 2023diffhist+1,239
Irish logarithm
rv removal. The meat of the technique is the lookup table itself, and removing it significantly weakens the article. I suppose the argument here is that Ludgate obviously wouldn't have used python, but that's not the point. It's illustrative, and it's perfectly normal to change the presentation of sourced information.Tag: Undo