21:5121:51, 10 April 2023diffhist+760
Rohilla dynasty
Biased editor, pushing cat agenda. Contradictory writing ("they could not present any evidence...any pedigree" ... later confusingly acknowledges pedigree but says its false. Ignores early rohillkand sources, such as biographies of Dundee Khan and uses only colonial sources.Tags: RevertedDisambiguation links added
21:4321:43, 10 April 2023diffhist+475
Rohilla dynasty
Undoing Edit by overzealous caste based Indian. Also made changes to muslim Jat page where he seems to be convinced that Rohillas are cats. Claims that the Rohilla's of Rampur as being Jat is not accepted by Modern scholarship on the basis that the only source for this is slander used by their rivals the children of Hafiz Rehmat Khan Barech and hence is not reliable. Contemporary sources do not ascribe eat heritage.Tag: Reverted
09:4809:48, 4 September 2020diffhist−53
Nawab
Don't know why there is an emphasis on Grand Duke and Duke. No source provided for that. Lethbridge mentions only king of saxony and not grand duke and dukes.
17:0917:09, 7 June 2020diffhist+1,253
Imperial, royal and noble ranks
Urdu added (With rough approximations of ranks, especially between marquis and baron). The British rank Sardar as barons of Punjab.Chaudhry is said to have ranked second to a raja in british documents. Diwan and thakur are lesser to Nawab in british documents, though higher than chaudhry. Chaudhry most other zamindar titles. Rais was given in canal colonies and UP, while pasha is a personal title in india, not associated with territories and a rough approx.
23:5423:54, 1 May 2020diffhist+122
Rohilla dynasty
Ali Muhammad Khan by the vast majority of authors is believed to be of adopted origins and hence not proper afghan. Although he was adopted. The Rohilla Dynasty itself and many of the earlier and more important sources indicate a Barha Lineage. More information can be found in Akhbar us sandeed.