24 August 2023
- 05:3905:39, 24 August 2023 diff hist +501 Talk:Pedro II of Brazil →I am concerned about Pedro II of Brazil's article: comment
8 January 2023
- 16:3916:39, 8 January 2023 diff hist +951 Talk:Pedro II of Brazil →Merger proposal: Oppose
12 June 2022
- 19:1619:16, 12 June 2022 diff hist +10 Pedro II of Brazil Undid revision 1092810025 by Tdizzle8265 (talk) Tag: Undo
17 May 2022
- 01:0501:05, 17 May 2022 diff hist +51 Pedro II of Brazil Undid revision 1086871182 by 177.130.168.119 (talk) Tag: Undo
9 April 2022
- 19:0419:04, 9 April 2022 diff hist +19 Empire of Brazil Undid revision 1081792014 by Vif12vf (talk) how odd. Why are these users trying to push Brazil as unitary? Tag: Undo
4 April 2022
- 21:2121:21, 4 April 2022 diff hist −167 Empire of Brazil Fixed the current issues, especially the absurd claim that Brazil, which was divided in several self-governing provinces, was "unitary" (whoever edited does not understand the difference between "centralized" and "unitary"), and also added a map from around 1885 that shows the contested borders which were ALWAYS part of Brazil
- 05:2205:22, 4 April 2022 diff hist +203 Talk:Empire of Brazil →Article is no longer reliable: ce
- 05:0505:05, 4 April 2022 diff hist +14 Empire of Brazil The article is no longer reliable. See talk page
- 05:0205:02, 4 April 2022 diff hist +305 Talk:Empire of Brazil →Article is no longer reliable: more egregious changes
- 04:5904:59, 4 April 2022 diff hist +761 Talk:Empire of Brazil →Article is no longer reliable: new section
2 April 2022
- 04:5304:53, 2 April 2022 diff hist +707 User talk:Nutez Undid revision 1063752772 by Squared.Circle.Boxing (talk) you’re just an anonymous profile, a no one. There you go. Take the little pleasure you may get from this petty act of reverting my comment. Pathetic being. Tags: Undo Reverted
4 January 2022
- 18:2518:25, 4 January 2022 diff hist +707 User talk:Nutez Undid revision 1063687725 by Squared.Circle.Boxing (talk) censorship? Those are my words. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 04:3404:34, 4 January 2022 diff hist +707 User talk:Nutez →ANI response: reply Tag: Reverted
13 October 2021
- 20:5620:56, 13 October 2021 diff hist +8 m Joe Bennett (artist) →Controversy: ce
- 20:5520:55, 13 October 2021 diff hist +13 m Joe Bennett (artist) →Controversy: ce
- 20:5420:54, 13 October 2021 diff hist −18 Joe Bennett (artist) →Controversy: Simpler
- 20:5320:53, 13 October 2021 diff hist +138 Joe Bennett (artist) →Controversy: Corrected text and gave a better understanding of Brazil's political customs
- 20:4520:45, 13 October 2021 diff hist +409 Joe Bennett (artist) →Controversy: Correcting this entire passage, which is misleading and biased. I also provided context to the meaning of the political cartoon
1 October 2021
- 03:3403:34, 1 October 2021 diff hist +423 User talk:RandomCanadian →RfC on Pedro I of Brazil: reply
30 September 2021
- 21:4121:41, 30 September 2021 diff hist −7 User talk:RandomCanadian →RfC on Pedro I of Brazil: ce
- 21:3621:36, 30 September 2021 diff hist +1,148 User talk:RandomCanadian →RfC on Pedro I of Brazil: new section
- 02:0702:07, 30 September 2021 diff hist +5 Empire of Brazil Undid revision 1047251691 by Moonraker (talk) Tag: Undo
29 September 2021
- 20:5920:59, 29 September 2021 diff hist −14 Pedro II of Brazil Undid revision 1047249332 by OlliverWithDoubleL (talk) Tag: Undo
27 September 2021
- 13:4313:43, 27 September 2021 diff hist +225 Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →RFC: Should linked monarch names be in the form that their respective articles are?: Move on. Only you care about this
23 September 2021
- 18:1118:11, 23 September 2021 diff hist −21 Pedro I of Brazil →First marriage: To be honest, this part is quite redundant. I don't know why I wrote it back then. Feel free to revert my edit
12 September 2021
- 06:4706:47, 12 September 2021 diff hist +300 Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →RFC: Should linked monarch names be in the form that their respective articles are?: one user is openly canvassing to get “votes” to his side, while the other clearly has no understanding of the topic being discussed. Both don’t, actually. That’s the level of debate in Wikipedia
11 September 2021
- 03:0603:06, 11 September 2021 diff hist 0 Pedro Álvares Cabral Undid revision 1043625619 by 47.217.24.252 (talk) Tag: Undo
8 September 2021
- 14:5514:55, 8 September 2021 diff hist +140 Pedro II of Brazil Undid revision 1043083618 by 67.168.92.239 (talk) Tag: Undo
7 September 2021
- 16:2216:22, 7 September 2021 diff hist −9 Pedro I of Brazil Undid revision 1042950728 by OlliverWithDoubleL (talk) Tag: Undo
30 August 2021
- 04:1604:16, 30 August 2021 diff hist −6 Pedro I of Brazil →First marriage: See my previous edit. There should only be a single picture per section
- 04:1304:13, 30 August 2021 diff hist +79 Pedro I of Brazil →First marriage: An entire paragraph added to what is already said in this section; that Pedro I was a capable musician. I added a link to the anthem as footnote, as not to break the flow of the narrative
- 04:0604:06, 30 August 2021 diff hist −454 Pedro I of Brazil No edit summary Tag: Undo
29 August 2021
- 02:5502:55, 29 August 2021 diff hist +695 Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →Discussion: reply
- 02:1602:16, 29 August 2021 diff hist +2 User talk:GoodDay →Stop: ce
- 02:1402:14, 29 August 2021 diff hist +821 User talk:GoodDay →Stop: nope
- 00:0100:01, 29 August 2021 diff hist +51 Empire of Brazil What? Tag: Undo
- 00:0000:00, 29 August 2021 diff hist +12 Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias Undid revision 1041151987 by Excommunicato (talk) According to you, but in a country divided between monarchists and republicans, his side mattered Tag: Undo
28 August 2021
- 23:5923:59, 28 August 2021 diff hist +549 User talk:GoodDay →Stop: new section
- 23:5623:56, 28 August 2021 diff hist −1,480 Pedro I of Brazil His penchant for music is already mentioned elsewhere and you didn't even attempt to follow the standard for names used in the article Tags: Undo Reverted
25 August 2021
- 19:2119:21, 25 August 2021 diff hist −49 Pedro II of Brazil No edit summary Tag: Undo
22 August 2021
- 19:3919:39, 22 August 2021 diff hist −1 m Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →Survey: correction
- 19:3219:32, 22 August 2021 diff hist +269 Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →RFC: Should linked monarch names be in the form that their respective articles are?: At the end of the day. It’s all a matter of counting votes. There is zero historiographical debate. Typical.
20 August 2021
- 18:5818:58, 20 August 2021 diff hist +601 Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →Discussion: Add
- 18:5318:53, 20 August 2021 diff hist 0 Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →Discussion
- 18:5318:53, 20 August 2021 diff hist +12 Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →Discussion: bold
- 18:5018:50, 20 August 2021 diff hist +474 Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →Discussion: You will be reported if you "invite" other people to force a majority to "win" the argument
- 18:3518:35, 20 August 2021 diff hist +486 Talk:Pedro I of Brazil →Discussion: no.
- 18:1418:14, 20 August 2021 diff hist +474 User talk:Lecen →The two Pedros: reply Tag: Reverted
- 17:5417:54, 20 August 2021 diff hist +288 Talk:Pedro II of Brazil →Wasn't he in the Portuguese line of succession?: my time is precious
- 17:5217:52, 20 August 2021 diff hist −5 Pedro I of Brazil Undid revision 1039778050 by GoodDay (talk) return to previous stable version – you should open a thread at the talk page and wait for consensus. Do you wish to causa trouble again? As usual? Tag: Undo
